Jesus: a Persona non Grata, via Google AI?

crossnote

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Senior Moderator
Google's AI definintion: "Persona non grata" is a Latin phrase that translates to "unwelcome person" or "person not acceptable" in English. It's typically used in the context of international relations to describe someone, especially a diplomat or consular official, who is deemed unacceptable by the government or sovereign to which they are accredited. When someone is declared persona non grata, they are effectively expelled from the country and are not permitted to return.

Scripture's definition:
John 1:11 KJV
He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
John 3:32 KJV
And what he hath seen and heard, that he testifieth; and no man receiveth his testimony.
John 3:19 KJV
And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Psalm 69:8 KJV
I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother's children.
Luke 17:25 KJV
But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation.

Again Google's AI definition of Jesus being welcomed by the crowds
In the Bible, Jesus was indeed welcomed by crowds, notably during his Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem on Palm Sunday. This event, as described in the Gospels, depicts Jesus riding a donkey while crowds spread cloaks and palm branches on the road, shouting "Hosanna". This reception was a demonstration of their belief that Jesus was the Messiah, fulfilling ancient prophecies.
Google AI goes on to say that Jesus's triumphal entry was recorded in all four gospels, where they were crying out, "Hosanna to the Son of David!,"
This was Palm Sunday (yesterday). What Google AI fails to mention is that most of that same crowd was crying out, "crucify Him" by the end of the week.
Thoughts?

Conclusion: Learning Latin phrases from Google AI may be fine, but I would steer clear of getting my biblical theology from Google AI.
Have a blessed Holy week.
 
Hello crossnote;

I do hear where you are coming from and this is my personal thought.

I still rely on the Holy Spirit to aid me in my study of the Scriptures, credible Biblical text authors, past and present Bible study teachers. I don't put a whole lot of stock in AI, (some general info, yes, but not all my eggs.)

Matthew 21:6-11, Mark 11:7-10, Luke 19:35-40 and John 12:12-16 reveal that the crowds joined and hailed Jesus as their king.

Unfortunately, they had the wrong idea about Christ and in a matter of a week many of these same people would cry out to crucify Him.

Sad, but during the trial a small number were supportive of Jesus while a large number opposed Him.

crossnote: Google AI goes on to say that Jesus's triumphal entry was recorded in all four gospels, where they were crying out, "Hosanna to the Son of David!," This was Palm Sunday (yesterday). What Google AI fails to mention is that most of that same crowd was crying out, "crucify Him" by the end of the week. Thoughts?

It could be that AI was only focusing on the Triumphal Entry Into Jerusalem but didn't combine Jesus' many teachings and events that would take place prior and during His arrest, and those who turned against and cried out, crucify Him!
 
Hello everyone in this interesting discussion!

I was very intrigued by this topic, as it raises important questions about the limits and role of artificial intelligence in spiritual matters.

I'd like to share my thoughts regarding the nature of artificial intelligence in the context of spiritual questions.

It's important to remember that artificial intelligence is just a tool. It has no soul, no personal faith, or spiritual experience. It simply analyzes existing information and formulates responses based on the data it has been trained on. Therefore, when AI expresses something about Jesus, it's not its own "vision"—it's a reflection of human ideas recorded in texts, articles, books, and forums.

In this specific case, Google AI's use of the phrase "persona non grata" was likely intended to illustrate how Jesus was rejected during His time. However, this phrase can sound somewhat political or even provocative. It's a clear example of how AI can miss the spiritual depth or cultural context of an event. You very accurately pointed out the deeper biblical meaning that AI only touched upon superficially.

I would also like to emphasize the importance of the Holy Spirit and living faith in our lives. Artificial intelligence cannot experience the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, pray sincerely, experience repentance, or have a personal encounter with Christ. Its reflections will always be limited to a logical analysis of information, even if they seem very insightful.

However, I believe that AI can still be a useful assistant. If we use it correctly—not as a "guru" or "teacher" in spiritual matters, but as a tool for quickly finding information or structuring our own thoughts—it can be helpful. As they say, a hammer isn't to blame if someone uses it incorrectly, and the same goes for AI.

In Christ,
Yurii
 
Ain't it true that A I is only as good as it's base programming and it's sources of data to make decisions?

I ain't payin' ANY attention to A I 'cause so far in my own lookin' around the net, it ain't fully correct and can be misleading in a bunch of ways. Ya got gullable people these days who are too lazy or brainwashed to do their OWN research and thinking, who believe these half truths and that can lead to a whole generation of messed up minds.

Remember what Revelation says in Chapter 22, Verses 18 and 19 ? Well, that probably applies to A I.

Use your own God given brain power and don't rely on somethin' that 'could' be manipulated by biased individuals that are behind A I with an agenda that Satan would approve of.

Y'all be careful with this stuff 'cause many schollars have warned humanity about it for several years, now.

`
 
AI only gives you the information requested, you put in the triumphant entry of Jesus and all you get is that information about that particular event. It does not offer any other insight or discernment. As Yurii said it is only a tool. Try asking it why the people changed their attitude about Jesus and began shouting crucify him. Then follow that with why was Jesus crucified, then what does his death on the cross mean for humanity, and then evidence of the resurrection. It will only give you limited information about the events you ask it about. I don't use AI for this reason, it is very limited in it's response and I miss related information that I would pick up doing my own research. I have seen some pretty cool artwork done by AI but I still prefer my own study of trusted sources.
 
We must bear in mind that AI is a computer program, a sophisticated one, but nonetheless a computer program. Its purpose is to collect and compile information. But like all computer programs it's basically stupid. It cannot think for itself or function on its own without human superintendence. Don't expect too much of it.

I once annoyed my son by asking his Amazon echo box to provide the absolute value of pi.
 
Last edited:
True, but as I see it, though convenient, I can see how easily we can rely on it rather than God.
Thinking of...
James 1:5 NKJV
If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all liberally and without reproach, and it will be given to him.
Dear crossnote,

Unfortunately, I have to agree with your concern regarding that for some, AI might seem like an easy path to obtaining answers and "wisdom."

Indeed, God grants us wisdom and fosters our development, but this process is inextricably linked to our life experiences, observations, and understanding of the world, which requires time and effort. AI, on the other hand, offers instant solutions, which can become a temptation for those who seek to obtain everything quickly and without much effort, leading to excessive reliance on technology.

However, in my opinion, a person who has come to know God would hardly replace Him in their heart with artificial intelligence. Personally, the difference between my life before encountering God and after is so profound that it's difficult to put into words. Before, it was more of an existence than a true life. No artificial intelligence could ever take the place of God in my heart and give me what I have found in faith.

Thank you for this important observation.

Sincerely,
Yurii
 
However, in my opinion, a person who has come to know God would hardly replace Him in their heart with artificial intelligence. Personally, the difference between my life before encountering God and after is so profound that it's difficult to put into words. Before, it was more of an existence than a true life. No artificial intelligence could ever take the place of God in my heart and give me what I have found in faith.
Yurii, this is definitely true on a personal level, especially for one who has been truly regenerated, but think in terms of the Corporate Church, even Christiandom, and how easily the culture around them influences the church.
 
Yurii, this is definitely true on a personal level, especially for one who has been truly regenerated, but think in terms of the Corporate Church, even Christiandom, and how easily the culture around them influences the church.
Dear crossnote,

Your point regarding the influence of culture on the Corporate Church and Christianity as a whole is very valid. Undoubtedly, on a personal level, especially for those who have experienced true spiritual regeneration, faith in God remains steadfast and cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence.

However, if we look at it more broadly, at the level of the Church as an institution and Christianity in general, we cannot ignore the powerful influence of the surrounding culture. Modern society, with its desire for quick solutions, technological progress, and instant gratification, can subtly permeate the church environment.

There is a risk that some aspects of faith may be simplified or adapted under the influence of these cultural trends. Of course, AI itself will not replace God in the hearts of believers, but the temptation to rely on the quick and easy answers it offers could weaken the desire for deep spiritual seeking, prayer, and personal knowledge of God through traditional church practices.

Along with this, we must understand that AI is an inevitable part of our future, and the Church cannot simply stand in opposition to AI, because in doing so, it will create a barrier between itself and a large part of humanity. The capabilities of rapid AI analysis are already allowing for the improvement of processes in various fields. For example, I saw an advertisement last night that is quite relevant to our conversation:

"Early Diabetes Complications Can Now Be Detected with AI in a Lviv Clinichttps://lviv1256.com/?p=192484
A specialized platform analyzes retinal images in just 2 minutes and detects the earliest changes—even before any symptoms appear.
The screening is free, painless, and takes up to 10 minutes.
Where to go: Polyclinic at 3 Stetska St. (2nd floor, Room 22)
When: Mon–Fri, 09:00–18:00
You can come on your own or with a doctor’s referral
Already, 350 people have been examined—50 of them were found to have eye pathologies.
Priority is given to individuals aged 40+ and those in risk groups.
"


As we can see, the capabilities of AI in rapid data analysis are already enabling its application in medicine. In 10 years (or perhaps even a year), these capabilities will expand to simplify calculations and conduct analysis in almost every field. AI now is like the invention of the calculator was once – it simplifies complex calculations and frees up time. And... I don't yet have a clear answer to the question of how exactly, but I think we need to think more about how the Church can be involved in this process so as not to become opposed to AI itself. As I said, AI is just a tool, but a tool that people around the world will soon be using. If we now introduce narratives that AI is evil, we will create a chasm between the Church and future generations, essentially – we will destroy the Church ourselves.

It is important to maintain vigilance and wisdom so that the Church, while carrying the Gospel into the world, does not succumb excessively to cultural influence, preserving its authenticity and deep connection with God, which transcends any technology, and at the same time does not alienate future generations who will grow up in a world where AI will be commonplace.

Thank you for this important expansion of the topic.

Sincerely,
Yurii.
 
Dear crossnote,

Your point regarding the influence of culture on the Corporate Church and Christianity as a whole is very valid. Undoubtedly, on a personal level, especially for those who have experienced true spiritual regeneration, faith in God remains steadfast and cannot be replaced by artificial intelligence.

However, if we look at it more broadly, at the level of the Church as an institution and Christianity in general, we cannot ignore the powerful influence of the surrounding culture. Modern society, with its desire for quick solutions, technological progress, and instant gratification, can subtly permeate the church environment.

There is a risk that some aspects of faith may be simplified or adapted under the influence of these cultural trends. Of course, AI itself will not replace God in the hearts of believers, but the temptation to rely on the quick and easy answers it offers could weaken the desire for deep spiritual seeking, prayer, and personal knowledge of God through traditional church practices.

Along with this, we must understand that AI is an inevitable part of our future, and the Church cannot simply stand in opposition to AI, because in doing so, it will create a barrier between itself and a large part of humanity. The capabilities of rapid AI analysis are already allowing for the improvement of processes in various fields. For example, I saw an advertisement last night that is quite relevant to our conversation:

"Early Diabetes Complications Can Now Be Detected with AI in a Lviv Clinichttps://lviv1256.com/?p=192484
A specialized platform analyzes retinal images in just 2 minutes and detects the earliest changes—even before any symptoms appear.
The screening is free, painless, and takes up to 10 minutes.
Where to go: Polyclinic at 3 Stetska St. (2nd floor, Room 22)
When: Mon–Fri, 09:00–18:00
You can come on your own or with a doctor’s referral
Already, 350 people have been examined—50 of them were found to have eye pathologies.
Priority is given to individuals aged 40+ and those in risk groups.
"


As we can see, the capabilities of AI in rapid data analysis are already enabling its application in medicine. In 10 years (or perhaps even a year), these capabilities will expand to simplify calculations and conduct analysis in almost every field. AI now is like the invention of the calculator was once – it simplifies complex calculations and frees up time. And... I don't yet have a clear answer to the question of how exactly, but I think we need to think more about how the Church can be involved in this process so as not to become opposed to AI itself. As I said, AI is just a tool, but a tool that people around the world will soon be using. If we now introduce narratives that AI is evil, we will create a chasm between the Church and future generations, essentially – we will destroy the Church ourselves.

It is important to maintain vigilance and wisdom so that the Church, while carrying the Gospel into the world, does not succumb excessively to cultural influence, preserving its authenticity and deep connection with God, which transcends any technology, and at the same time does not alienate future generations who will grow up in a world where AI will be commonplace.

Thank you for this important expansion of the topic.

Sincerely,
Yurii.
Yurii thank you for your insights on AI.Here is a link also relevant to our conversation…

I wonder how many pastors will take the bait?
(Don’t worry, I’m not an anti tech type, actually if I’m not careful I could go overboard with the stuff) lol
 
Back
Top