On Christian Disagreement
Yes, Christians disagree on the CONCLUSION… but not on the PREMISE…
at least how my logic see it : )
This is how I see it….
In Logic, there are rules, there is a Premise, and there are Conclusions.
No Premise, no conclusion.
A Premise is an assumption of truth, that is, an assumption.
It has to be taken for granted as truth… why: so as to proceed for the Premise to have a Conclusion.... No premise, No conclusion.
Precisely why I think: a Theist or Atheist is similar as far as the Premise…
They have FAITH in the PREMISE: There is God for the first, and there is none for the latter.
Now, for Christians: we share the same FAITH… or translated to PREMISE as far as logic of man is concerned.
God is Sovereign, God is Just, God is all Wisdom, God is Love, of God’s Grace, of Salvation by death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ….. WE SHARE THE SAME FAITH!
Yes, the disagreement exist on CONCLUSION of the old Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate, of meat and holidays, of hell, of annihilationism or even universalism....
Yes, the CONCLUSION may not be the SAME…. But we share the SAME premise…
And Christians refute each other CONCLUSION, and I think I see no trouble on that....
The trouble, I think, is when one Christian refute the PREMISE: Yours is not Sovereign, Yours is not Just, Your is not Wisdom, Your is of no of Love, …..
Ohh….. that is foul… I think... that is the Premise... a COMMON SHARED premise!
In fact, I think it is not even FOUL, it is IRRATIONAL as it is refuting the same FAITH!
We share the same premise… that is, we share the same FAITH!
Just a thought : )
Yes, Christians disagree on the CONCLUSION… but not on the PREMISE…
at least how my logic see it : )
This is how I see it….
In Logic, there are rules, there is a Premise, and there are Conclusions.
No Premise, no conclusion.
A Premise is an assumption of truth, that is, an assumption.
It has to be taken for granted as truth… why: so as to proceed for the Premise to have a Conclusion.... No premise, No conclusion.
Precisely why I think: a Theist or Atheist is similar as far as the Premise…
They have FAITH in the PREMISE: There is God for the first, and there is none for the latter.
Now, for Christians: we share the same FAITH… or translated to PREMISE as far as logic of man is concerned.
God is Sovereign, God is Just, God is all Wisdom, God is Love, of God’s Grace, of Salvation by death and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ….. WE SHARE THE SAME FAITH!
Yes, the disagreement exist on CONCLUSION of the old Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate, of meat and holidays, of hell, of annihilationism or even universalism....
Yes, the CONCLUSION may not be the SAME…. But we share the SAME premise…
And Christians refute each other CONCLUSION, and I think I see no trouble on that....
The trouble, I think, is when one Christian refute the PREMISE: Yours is not Sovereign, Yours is not Just, Your is not Wisdom, Your is of no of Love, …..
Ohh….. that is foul… I think... that is the Premise... a COMMON SHARED premise!
In fact, I think it is not even FOUL, it is IRRATIONAL as it is refuting the same FAITH!
We share the same premise… that is, we share the same FAITH!
Just a thought : )