This young lady is someone who can think for herself.
It's usually the first borns who are priveliged, of any family.
Because a lot of wealthy people ARE white, people tend to think it's because of their skin as that's what they see first.
But wealthy people can be of any 'race'. People with money usually get served first though, that is the culture of many societies. Wealth can buy you status and prestige.
It's usually the first borns who are priveliged, of any family.
Because a lot of wealthy people ARE white, people tend to think it's because of their skin as that's what they see first.
But wealthy people can be of any 'race'. People with money usually get served first though, that is the culture of many societies. Wealth can buy you status and prestige.
I remember one of my workmates, she had a Indian dad and a pakeha (white) mum, and she was saying white privelige exists.
The thing is people may treat you better if you are white. In Indian families, the paler the skin, the more 'high caste' you are. Their society is very caste bound. The English (Anglos) ruled India for a time.
Another of my friends dad was Jamaican and her mother was white(English) . She definitely felt that her dad was excluded from many things in England because he was 'black'. Like her mothers friends wouldn't even speak to him and treated him like a servant or someone inferior.
However I suspect that her mother might not be treated so well in Guyana where she was born. I think depends where you go, who is ruling at the time.
In NZ most of the owners of the big businesses, govts, mayors etc have been English but not all British people are English. There are Scots, Welsh, Irish. And the Brits look down on other Europeans, esp Eastern Europeans (even though they are 'white') . It was because the English have this tradition of, not ever being slaves, but enslaving everyone else!
The CRT nonsense that's sweeping through our culture here in the U.S. is based purely upon skin color, not economic standing. CRT is nothing more than pay-back racism, where the end justifies the means, even when it's perpetrated by a generation that has never picked cotton in their lives, perpetrated against a generation that has never owned slaves, never held anyone back on any basis whatsoever, especially skin color, and has exhibited less bias and racism than at any other time since the slave days.
So, when I walk through the university campus and stop at the CRT table, the students working those tables are those who daily put on the 'makeup' of victimhood, complaining that they, as a so-called "race," have been kept from advancing (whatever that means) as they think they should have. Their narrative is such that, because of my lighter skin color (even though I'm Indian-Israeli mix), I have allegedly been enjoying unfair privilege/advantage, as if all that I have achieved was not all earned, but some of it having been given to me, as if on a silver platter.
There are some wonderful men and women out there standing up against the destructive tides sweeping culture only because they are given voice none of the rest of us has within mass media. You sure won't see this great man in CNN or MSNBC or The View:
It's past time we all learn to love one another as Christ commanded.
Amen
MM
Probably because your mass media doesn't think it affects their audience, or they don't have access to Islamic countries news. It's a bit tightly controlled what other countries allow others to know about their work practices.We also don't hear anything in mass media about slavery still being practiced to this very day within more than 50 of the 90+ islamic countries around the world. Statistics tell a story to those who know how to read them.
MM
Probably because your mass media doesn't think it affects their audience, or they don't have access to Islamic countries news. It's a bit tightly controlled what other countries allow others to know about their work practices.
I don't think your mass media is benevolent, its just self-interested.
Why pay it any attention? It's actually fueled by advertising, if it had no advertising to pay for it, it wouldn't be on air.
In most countries there is some sort of censorship and standards of broadcasting people need to adhere to, but these can all change at a govts whims, but the govt is usually what the majority have voted for, even if it goes rogue, but that is what happens in a democracy. Dictatorships can get voted in even in a democracy/republic. Thing is people aren't always aware they voted in a dictator until a few terms in they show their true colours when power goes to their head, and then people can vote them out again.
That is just the way it goes.