Scientist says he found definitive proof that God exists

Abdicate

Abdicate

GEOPHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL STUDIES

The theoretical physicist Michio Kaku claims to have developed a theory that might point to the existence of God. The information has created a great stir in the scientific community because Kaku is considered one of the most important scientists of our times, one of the creators and developers of the revolutionary String Theory which is highly respected throughout the world.

To to come to his conclusions, the physicist made use of what he calls “primitive semi – radius tachyons “.

Tachyons are theoretical particles capable to “unstick ” the Universe matter or vacuum space between matter particles, leaving everything free from the influences of the surrounding universe.

After conducting the tests, Kaku came to the conclusion that we live in a “Matrix”.

“I have concluded that we are in a world made by rules created by an intelligence”, he affirmed. “Believe me, everything that we call chance today won’t make sense anymore.”

“To me it is clear that we exists in a plan which is governed by rules that were created, shaped by a universal intelligence and not by chance.”


youtu.be/jremlZvNDuk

http://ageac.org/en/multimedia/scientist-says-he-found-definitive-proof-that-god-exists-2/
 
I wouldn't mind being the proverbial 'fly on the wall' when that guy actually comes face to face with the one true God.
 
I don't blame anyone for dismissing God because we Christians haven't done a good job of representing Him. We show and teach legalism instead of love. So when a scientist has a thirst for the truth God will visit them and have them arrive at the truth - that He exists. That's what the word of God is, a map to the Truth. I applaud this video because it took guts to speak the truth that GOD EXISTS. The word of God is filled with amazing mathematics, which explains why people hate math! :p
 
Rom 11:33. Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!
Rom 11:34. "For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?"
Rom 11:35. "Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?"
Rom 11:36.For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.
 
Indeed. God puts the desire for Him in all our hearts. When we come face to face with the Truth, He changes us.

John 14:6 (KJV)
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.​
 
Abdicate said:
I don't blame anyone for dismissing God because we Christians haven't done a good job of representing Him.
Click to expand...
Yes we are supposed to be ambassadors. Nevertheless:
Rom 1:19. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them.
Rom 1:20. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
So though we might fall down on the job, they are still without excuse.
1Jn_4:16 So we have come to know and to believe the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.
So God is love, at least (apart from Rom 1:20), that is His most obvious attribute, not some sort of mathematician.

Well to me, such a person has attempted to strip the Lord of all personality and reduce Him to an impersonal, disembodied calculator. But that is me.
We, (all of us) have all the proof the wisdom of God has determined necessary for our coming to know of His existence, and through Christ Jesus we can go beyond the basics to come to know what is the mind of God.
 
I suppose if you want to see the negative side of it, I understand how you arrived at that conclusion. I love math and science. I guess I have more Hebrew than Greek in me because I don't do well with the abstract (Greek) but I understand actions (Hebrew). I see this video as yet another step of man turning back to God from the deep darkness of ignorance. Before the 1900's scientists believed the universe was eternal, no beginning. The evidence showed there had to be a beginning (Edwin Hubble), so it only took them 5800 years to believe God's first verse. No one's perfect. Ok. Now they admit that He exists and they describe Him in the only way they see Him, math, the place of His discovery for them. To a poet, God is in poetry. To a writer, God is in words. To a musician, God is in music. The math proves God exists. So it took them another 100 years to see that, within another 100 years, they shall see Him face to face. Slow indeed, but progress nonetheless. I look at this from a positive point of view. After all, humans see through the glass darkly and we live in the shadows. Science is proving this by acknowledging it in terms we're familiar with - the movie Matrix. Thirty years ago they wouldn't know how to explain it to the masses. For science to declare God exists is a great step forward. So they move slower than a sloth, they're at least still moving. :D
 
Heb 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.
Very few people could follow his maths to verify his conclusion, so for the rest of humanity either one needs faith in Michio Kaku, or faith in the Lord.
It is only some of the later group that got their names in the Bible.......that must mean something.(y)
 
calvin said:
Heb 11:6 And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.
Very few people could follow his maths to verify his conclusion, so for the rest of humanity either one needs faith in Michio Kaku, or faith in the Lord.
It is only some of the later group that got their names in the Bible.......that must mean something.(y)
Click to expand...
"Come let us reason together..." Faith is not blind, it's a strong conviction of a belief. This isn't about "math" it's about a man coming to the conclusion that God exists! I can't believe you want to argue how one comes to known the Truth. Wow! You certainly have proven my point. Discern what that is.
 
I always thought this guy was silly,but now he's getting rich on a small universe. Everything was made for
(HIM).As in like,snap fingers and angels put stuff together.I got an image:angels actually holding stuff
together fighting off the laws of physics.Angels are cheaper than black holes.
bye
 
Abdicate said:
I don't blame anyone for dismissing God because we Christians haven't done a good job of representing Him. We show and teach legalism instead of love. So when a scientist has a thirst for the truth God will visit them and have them arrive at the truth - that He exists. That's what the word of God is, a map to the Truth. I applaud this video because it took guts to speak the truth that GOD EXISTS. The word of God is filled with amazing mathematics, which explains why people hate math! :p
Click to expand...
Lol I don't hate god BC I hate math...I hate math BC its difficult and It doesn't come easy to me...math is the devil for me xD math is pure evil. Lol
 
pancakes said:
Lol I don't hate god BC I hate math...I hate math BC its difficult and It doesn't come easy to me...math is the devil for me xD math is pure evil. Lol
Click to expand...
:D

Math is hard because most people don't have a good foundation of it. Without a good foundation, it all crumbles apart. Math, like the law, demands perfection yet does not help us get it. That's why it's so unforgiving and confusing.
 
I remember reading an article once in which the following was given::
(a+b)^2 = a^2+2ab+b^2 therefore God exists.
I suppose that was awe inspiring enough for people who found counting the fingers on their hand a challenge,
but these days.....?
Well so much for advanced maths.:D
 
I'm not sure how to point to things properly, but here goes...
Abdicate said:
I'm NOT saying that. Jesus rose Saturday at just before sunrise. That's what the evidence is all about. Please please please reread all 17 pages to understand how I got here.
Click to expand...
That is from the three days/nights thread
I notice that paragraph 29 of the article you have linked to here in this thread states that Jesus rose from the dead on day eight (the first day of the week).
Which is true do you think?
To be honest Abdicate, it is all to messy for my simple mind to work with.
For example, all the stuff I read is base 10 numbering. But that originated in India or China.
Now we read that there are seven days in a week and seven seems to dominate the various words in Gen 1:1 etc. ......But.......
all this is using base 10 arithmetic, and there was no base 10 in use in those days. There are seven days of creation, so should those earlier writings in particular be counted using what?? base 7 or base 6 arithmetic?
0,1,2,3,4,5,6 =7 0r 0,1,2,3,4,5, =6 taking us up to the Sabbath, with 106 being day 8 or the first day 0f the week in our base 10 numbering system? All too complicated and loaded with too many unknowables in my opinion.
Having read such rubbish as 'Chariots of the gods' and 'worlds in collision', it leaves me with a cautious approach to numerology because it seems that any number can be related (however inaccurately) to anything else.
So, I'm left wondering which base numbering system (if any) should be applied to the earlier Bible texts since they had no base ten system at that time.
 
calvin said:
I'm not sure how to point to things properly, but here goes...

That is from the three days/nights thread
I notice that paragraph 29 of the article you have linked to here in this thread states that Jesus rose from the dead on day eight (the first day of the week).
Which is true do you think?
To be honest Abdicate, it is all to messy for my simple mind to work with.
For example, all the stuff I read is base 10 numbering. But that originated in India or China.
Now we read that there are seven days in a week and seven seems to dominate the various words in Gen 1:1 etc. ......But.......
all this is using base 10 arithmetic, and there was no base 10 in use in those days. There are seven days of creation, so should those earlier writings in particular be counted using what?? base 7 or base 6 arithmetic?
0,1,2,3,4,5,6 =7 0r 0,1,2,3,4,5, =6 taking us up to the Sabbath, with 106 being day 8 or the first day 0f the week in our base 10 numbering system? All too complicated and loaded with too many unknowables in my opinion.
Having read such rubbish as 'Chariots of the gods' and 'worlds in collision', it leaves me with a cautious approach to numerology because it seems that any number can be related (however inaccurately) to anything else.
So, I'm left wondering which base numbering system (if any) should be applied to the earlier Bible texts since they had no base ten system at that time.
Click to expand...
Well, you just have to do your own homework. That's what I do. Don't believe me, but don't be lazy either. :) See I find with all controversial theories is that something from the word of God has been removed or changed. It took me ten years to iron out most of the chronology of man according to the scriptures, and recently to sort our Jesus' resurrection day. It all fits. You just have to be willing to believe all the word of God when it conflicts with theology. God is a perfect Mathematician because He's perfect at everything. How a person comes to know God is between them and their Maker. Math, science, poetry, cats, dogs, stars, it's all God's work. That's why we're to study to show ourselves approved and have an answer for anyone who asks. That's how I see it.

I like base 2, and 16!

01000111 01101111 01100100 00100000 01000010 01101100 01100101 01110011 01110011
47-6f-64-20-42-6c-65-73-73
:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top