Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get your point. But some Anglican and other protestant churches are doing it as well. In my old age, I am tempted to think so what. We will all find areas where we are wrong. As long as we have the basics of Salvation by faith in Jesus, does any of the rest of these things really matter?I'm not catholic so, I don't really think that much about it!
People just wanna argue stuff! I'd rather people didn't argue and just got on with it.
our church has a married couple who are both priests( I think its Protestant)It seems that number of women pastors is on the rise in protestant churches. This is an old study (2007), but it lists church organizations and their stance at that time. Apparently there has been a large increase in the number of women pastors since that time.
denominations_20070405.pub (cbeinternational.org)
cp
I read that the Pope had recently appointed a woman to the Synod of Bishops. Many churches have been ordaining women deacons, etc for awhile now.
Biblically it seems there are arguments on both sides. So what do y'all think?
I always respect your answers major.If you are looking for what people want then you will get the answer that women Deacons and Pastors are just as good as men so why not.
If on the other hand you want to know what God says then He tell us in 1 Timothy 3:1-3........(KJV)
"This is a true saying, If a "man" desire the office of a bishop, "he" desireth a good work. 2A bishop then must be blameless, "the husband of one wife," vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 3Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous".
There is perhaps no more hotly debated issue in the church today than the issue of women serving as pastors. As a result, it is very important to not see this issue as men versus women so do not think that I am taking sides! There are women who believe women should not serve as pastors and that the Bible places restrictions on the ministry of women, and there are men who believe women can serve as pastors and that there are no restrictions on women in ministry. This is not an issue of chauvinism or discrimination. It is an issue of biblical interpretation.
Some say that Verses 8–10 clearly refer to all men and women, not just husbands and wives. so the point is mute, and there is nothing in the context that would indicate a narrowing to husbands and wives in verses 11–14.
Some say the word "MAN' in verse 1 stands for "HUMANITY" thus opening the door for women to be pastors.
I always stand on God's side!!! However the real question should be WHY did God say that?
1 Timothy 2:11-12 says...........
“A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent”.
OK! Got it. But then again we have to ask, WHY would God say THAT?
If you all would read 1 Timothy 2:11-14 God makes the reason why women cannot be pastors perfectly clear.
Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of Paul’s statement in verses 11–12. Why should women not teach or have authority over men?
Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14). God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The order of creation has universal application in the family and in the church. It is really just that simple.
With the advancement of the "Feminist Movement" in recent decade, this argument has increased because women want the same ability as men.
Unfortunately, God does not deal with politics and what we want.
The fact that Eve was deceived is also given in 1 Timothy 2:14 as a reason for women not serving as pastors or having spiritual authority over men. This does not mean that women are gullible or that they are all more easily deceived than men. If all women are more easily deceived, why would they be allowed to teach children (who are easily deceived) and other women (who are supposedly more easily deceived)? The text simply says that women are not to teach men or have spiritual authority over men because Eve was deceived. God has chosen to give men the primary teaching authority in the church.
Now some will feel the need to argue that answer with me and my answer is again real simple.......I do not know, when you get to heaven make a point to ask the Lord Jesus Christ as He is the author of those directions and I am sure He will take the time to explain.
Now remember, I gave to you what says the Lord. My name is not found on the book of Timothy.I always respect your answers major.
so when the bible says 'teach' what does it mean?
when I think of 'teach' I think of a teacher in a school teaching people subjects that they have have learned themselves. usually from respected sources.
I am kind of wary of saying anything biblical to guys these days, in case it comes across as 'teaching them' things I shouldn't.
Like your thoughtful answer. But there are many instances in the bible where women were in the forefront. Deborah was both a prophet and a Judge. Miriam led worship in Ex 15:20. Huldah the prophetess had a leading role in 2 Kings. Mary of Bethany who sat at the feet of Jesus, a privilege normally reserved for men. Lydia was an early Church leader in Phillippi and believers gathered at her home. Luke mentions Priscilla before Aquilla which may mean she was the lead teacher of the two. Joel 2 speaks of "Your sons and DAUGHTERS will prophecy. Peter confirmed this on the Day of Pentacost. Don't wish to argue but if women are NEVER to teach or lead men, why does the Word reference these women in teaching/prophecy/worship?If you are looking for what people want then you will get the answer that women Deacons and Pastors are just as good as men so why not.
If on the other hand you want to know what God says then He tell us in 1 Timothy 3:1-3........(KJV)
"This is a true saying, If a "man" desire the office of a bishop, "he" desireth a good work. 2A bishop then must be blameless, "the husband of one wife," vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 3Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous".
There is perhaps no more hotly debated issue in the church today than the issue of women serving as pastors. As a result, it is very important to not see this issue as men versus women so do not think that I am taking sides! There are women who believe women should not serve as pastors and that the Bible places restrictions on the ministry of women, and there are men who believe women can serve as pastors and that there are no restrictions on women in ministry. This is not an issue of chauvinism or discrimination. It is an issue of biblical interpretation.
Some say that Verses 8–10 clearly refer to all men and women, not just husbands and wives. so the point is mute, and there is nothing in the context that would indicate a narrowing to husbands and wives in verses 11–14.
Some say the word "MAN' in verse 1 stands for "HUMANITY" thus opening the door for women to be pastors.
I always stand on God's side!!! However the real question should be WHY did God say that?
1 Timothy 2:11-12 says...........
“A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent”.
OK! Got it. But then again we have to ask, WHY would God say THAT?
If you all would read 1 Timothy 2:11-14 God makes the reason why women cannot be pastors perfectly clear.
Verse 13 begins with “for,” giving the “cause” of Paul’s statement in verses 11–12. Why should women not teach or have authority over men?
Because “Adam was created first, then Eve. And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived” (verses 13–14). God created Adam first and then created Eve to be a “helper” for Adam. The order of creation has universal application in the family and in the church. It is really just that simple.
With the advancement of the "Feminist Movement" in recent decade, this argument has increased because women want the same ability as men.
Unfortunately, God does not deal with politics and what we want.
The fact that Eve was deceived is also given in 1 Timothy 2:14 as a reason for women not serving as pastors or having spiritual authority over men. This does not mean that women are gullible or that they are all more easily deceived than men. If all women are more easily deceived, why would they be allowed to teach children (who are easily deceived) and other women (who are supposedly more easily deceived)? The text simply says that women are not to teach men or have spiritual authority over men because Eve was deceived. God has chosen to give men the primary teaching authority in the church.
Now some will feel the need to argue that answer with me and my answer is again real simple.......I do not know, when you get to heaven make a point to ask the Lord Jesus Christ as He is the author of those directions and I am sure He will take the time to explain.
There is NO biblical support to have women ordained as pastors, or appointed as being Elders in the local church!I read that the Pope had recently appointed a woman to the Synod of Bishops. Many churches have been ordaining women deacons, etc for awhile now.
Biblically it seems there are arguments on both sides. So what do y'all think?
Like your thoughtful answer. But there are many instances in the bible where women were in the forefront. Deborah was both a prophet and a Judge. Miriam led worship in Ex 15:20. Huldah the prophetess had a leading role in 2 Kings. Mary of Bethany who sat at the feet of Jesus, a privilege normally reserved for men. Lydia was an early Church leader in Phillippi and believers gathered at her home. Luke mentions Priscilla before Aquilla which may mean she was the lead teacher of the two. Joel 2 speaks of "Your sons and DAUGHTERS will prophecy. Peter confirmed this on the Day of Pentacost. Don't wish to argue but if women are NEVER to teach or lead men, why does the Word reference these women in teaching/prophecy/worship?
I was thinking this the other day.I agree that women are not to be pastors, nor elders. However I have a new question that has arisen from this thread.
If women are to be silent in churches (unless teaching other women/children), where does that leave forums like this?
Where there are two or more gathered in the name of Jesus Christ, does that not constitute a church?
If Christian Forum Site is a church, under biblical definition, are women to be silent in conversations with men?
I know this is splitting hairs, but what does scripture say? Women are to be silent in the churches.
Therefore I am sinning by participation in conversations not directed to the instruction of women and children.
Think the scriptures are addressing the issue if women are permitted to teach as either pastor or an elder!Neither do I, and my question still remains. Is an online forum considered a church, being it is a place where:
a) the body of Christ gathers regularly
b) there are pastors/congregational leaders posting material which is sermon based
c) conversations are question/answer/comment based from both genders
Am I sinning by participation where I should be remaining silent?
Also was the custom of time of Apostles, where the church had men on one side and women on the other, so the women were not to shout out to husband, and wait until they got home!There are two Greek verbs translated silence in the New Testament. In many cases these words have more the sense of holding one's peace say until an appropriate time.
Acts 15:12-13 Then all the multitude kept silence, G4601 and gave audience to Barnabas and Paul, declaring what miracles and wonders God had wrought among the Gentiles by them. 13 And after they had held G4601 ➔ their peace, G4601 James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
Here the multitude kept silent, holding their peace until the appropriate time to speak.
The church is the bride of Christ, the church too should be silent, holding their peace under certain circumstances with Christ, yet we are to speak to God. Job was made well aware that he should keep silent when God spoke to him and then he gave answer.
cp
Like your thoughtful answer. But there are many instances in the bible where women were in the forefront. Deborah was both a prophet and a Judge. Miriam led worship in Ex 15:20. Huldah the prophetess had a leading role in 2 Kings. Mary of Bethany who sat at the feet of Jesus, a privilege normally reserved for men. Lydia was an early Church leader in Phillippi and believers gathered at her home. Luke mentions Priscilla before Aquilla which may mean she was the lead teacher of the two. Joel 2 speaks of "Your sons and DAUGHTERS will prophecy. Peter confirmed this on the Day of Pentacost. Don't wish to argue but if women are NEVER to teach or lead men, why does the Word reference these women in teaching/prophecy/worship?
I agree that women are not to be pastors, nor elders. However I have a new question that has arisen from this thread.
If women are to be silent in churches (unless teaching other women/children), where does that leave forums like this?
Where there are two or more gathered in the name of Jesus Christ, does that not constitute a church?
If Christian Forum Site is a church, under biblical definition, are women to be silent in conversations with men?
I know this is splitting hairs, but what does scripture say? Women are to be silent in the churches.
Therefore I am sinning by participation in conversations not directed to the instruction of women and children.
a question for the men on here....
what do you think the bible means by women should be silent in church?
According to the Bible......IF a class of only men AGREE, then the woman can teach that class. However, if "one" objects then she should not be allowed to do so.
If it was not for the work of women in the church, there would be NO church at all!!!!