The big bang and human evolution theories are not just unbelief in Gen 1, but are sometimes used as ideological assaults on Gen 1, without scientific evidence.
2 Timothy{6:20} O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.
Neither of them are proven science, but are only theories without direct evidence. If they are ever taught as fact, and not as speculative theory alone, then they are socially engineered propaganda.
The creation of stars:
In Gen 1, God creates the universe of stars all at once. He does not begin the universe from a concentration of hot gas, without stars already formed. In the one day, that He created the stars, He created them already shining in multitude. The direct evidence for this is in fact, the expansive universe of stars. There has never been any record nor direct evidence of the universe ever being only gas, from which the stars would form in time. So long as there has been this universe, the only evidence that it has been an expansive universe of shining stars. Not a ball of hot gas without stars, energetically waiting to explode.
The big bang is only a recent modern theory, that is only postulated from the discovery by Hubble, that the universe is in fact expanding. The sensible logic is that since the universe is expanding, then it must have been contracted smaller than today. However, to then say it must have been contracted to space, is not logically necessary. Especially to have been without any stars formed at all. There is no record nor direct evidence of such place without the universal stars shining. And, Hubble himself did not theorize any big bang.
And so, there is direct evidence of an expansive universe of stars created all at once. Because the universe of stars has never been shown to be without stars at any time. There is no direct evidence of any time or place, where there wasn't a universe of stars at all, but only a hot ball of gas. Just because we know scientifically that new stars are born from such hot gas, does not mean that all stars began from hot gas, especially not from one place in the universe with not stars at all.
The creation of man:
In Gen 1, man and woman is created in the image of God, distinctly different from all other creatures on the earth. And just like the universe of stars, the direct evidence is people being distinctly different from all animals on the earth. Our bodies may be distantly similar to some animals, but our hearts and minds are irreconcilably separate from all brute beasts of the field.
Men and woman can think, imagine, plan, and most importantly choose to believe or not believe. Animals can't. Intelligently, there is no place of common comparison between people and animals. The fact that we are separate by soul and spirit from all other creatures on earth, proves we are created distinctly different as in Gen 1. However, we can also logically conclude, that since we can believe or not believe, we are therefore created in the image of the God of faith. Natural animals are created by the same God, but not in His image, because they have no faith to live by, but only natural instinct.
And once again like the big bang, human evolutionary theory has no direct evidence of any human-primate skeletal remains. There is no skeleton found of a primate that is also today's human, nor of a human today that is also primate. The only remains are of primates, that are distantly shaped like human beings, but they are still only primates. Scientific fact is not based upon 'looking like' something. Appearances can be deceiving. And when facts are sought to confirm a desired pre-conclusion, the facts become very deceptive indeed.
And the preconclusion is proven by theoretic presumptions of the primate remains, that resemble some human traits: The presumption is that they evolutionized to become human beings. Why not simply conclude they became extinct primates, since they don't exist anymore? In addition to the big bang latching onto an expanding universe, human evolution also attaches itself to proven biological evolution within a single species.
If the big band or human evolution is taught as proven science, then it is a lie, and is only for social engineering. And we can see the deceitful manner of the propaganda, when the pseudo-scientist argues them as an expanding universe and geological evolution. They correctly teach the cosmological expansion and evolutionary science, but then insert the unproven big bang and human evolution into them. They talk about the big bang and human evolution, as though they were only teaching an expanding universe and biological evolution. We can be logical proponents of an expanding universe and evolution, without being ideological believers in the big bang and human evolution.
Conclusion: Gen 1 account of God creating the universe of stars, and men and women in His own image, have daily direct evidence, that has never been proven untrue as we are today.
The big bang and human evolutionary theories have no direct evidence nor record of ever existing, and only ideologically piggy-back other proven scientific fact.
To believe in Gen 1 creation is not only possible, but is logically rational based on continued direct evidence. However, believing in the big bang and human evolution is only possible by ideological means, not by proven science. We can believe Gen 1 with eyes wide open to daily existence. But, only by blind faith alone, can ideologues declare the big bang and human evolution are true. And an even worse, is the dark logic that declares Gen 1 can't be true...
Jhn 1:9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
Jhn 1:5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Mat 6:23But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
2 Timothy{6:20} O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.
Neither of them are proven science, but are only theories without direct evidence. If they are ever taught as fact, and not as speculative theory alone, then they are socially engineered propaganda.
The creation of stars:
In Gen 1, God creates the universe of stars all at once. He does not begin the universe from a concentration of hot gas, without stars already formed. In the one day, that He created the stars, He created them already shining in multitude. The direct evidence for this is in fact, the expansive universe of stars. There has never been any record nor direct evidence of the universe ever being only gas, from which the stars would form in time. So long as there has been this universe, the only evidence that it has been an expansive universe of shining stars. Not a ball of hot gas without stars, energetically waiting to explode.
The big bang is only a recent modern theory, that is only postulated from the discovery by Hubble, that the universe is in fact expanding. The sensible logic is that since the universe is expanding, then it must have been contracted smaller than today. However, to then say it must have been contracted to space, is not logically necessary. Especially to have been without any stars formed at all. There is no record nor direct evidence of such place without the universal stars shining. And, Hubble himself did not theorize any big bang.
And so, there is direct evidence of an expansive universe of stars created all at once. Because the universe of stars has never been shown to be without stars at any time. There is no direct evidence of any time or place, where there wasn't a universe of stars at all, but only a hot ball of gas. Just because we know scientifically that new stars are born from such hot gas, does not mean that all stars began from hot gas, especially not from one place in the universe with not stars at all.
The creation of man:
In Gen 1, man and woman is created in the image of God, distinctly different from all other creatures on the earth. And just like the universe of stars, the direct evidence is people being distinctly different from all animals on the earth. Our bodies may be distantly similar to some animals, but our hearts and minds are irreconcilably separate from all brute beasts of the field.
Men and woman can think, imagine, plan, and most importantly choose to believe or not believe. Animals can't. Intelligently, there is no place of common comparison between people and animals. The fact that we are separate by soul and spirit from all other creatures on earth, proves we are created distinctly different as in Gen 1. However, we can also logically conclude, that since we can believe or not believe, we are therefore created in the image of the God of faith. Natural animals are created by the same God, but not in His image, because they have no faith to live by, but only natural instinct.
And once again like the big bang, human evolutionary theory has no direct evidence of any human-primate skeletal remains. There is no skeleton found of a primate that is also today's human, nor of a human today that is also primate. The only remains are of primates, that are distantly shaped like human beings, but they are still only primates. Scientific fact is not based upon 'looking like' something. Appearances can be deceiving. And when facts are sought to confirm a desired pre-conclusion, the facts become very deceptive indeed.
And the preconclusion is proven by theoretic presumptions of the primate remains, that resemble some human traits: The presumption is that they evolutionized to become human beings. Why not simply conclude they became extinct primates, since they don't exist anymore? In addition to the big bang latching onto an expanding universe, human evolution also attaches itself to proven biological evolution within a single species.
If the big band or human evolution is taught as proven science, then it is a lie, and is only for social engineering. And we can see the deceitful manner of the propaganda, when the pseudo-scientist argues them as an expanding universe and geological evolution. They correctly teach the cosmological expansion and evolutionary science, but then insert the unproven big bang and human evolution into them. They talk about the big bang and human evolution, as though they were only teaching an expanding universe and biological evolution. We can be logical proponents of an expanding universe and evolution, without being ideological believers in the big bang and human evolution.
Conclusion: Gen 1 account of God creating the universe of stars, and men and women in His own image, have daily direct evidence, that has never been proven untrue as we are today.
The big bang and human evolutionary theories have no direct evidence nor record of ever existing, and only ideologically piggy-back other proven scientific fact.
To believe in Gen 1 creation is not only possible, but is logically rational based on continued direct evidence. However, believing in the big bang and human evolution is only possible by ideological means, not by proven science. We can believe Gen 1 with eyes wide open to daily existence. But, only by blind faith alone, can ideologues declare the big bang and human evolution are true. And an even worse, is the dark logic that declares Gen 1 can't be true...
Jhn 1:9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
Jhn 1:5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Mat 6:23But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!
