Are You Effected By The Culture????

Great Fiction said:
I understand your point with more clarity

I should say your conundrums or dichotomies materialize from progressive legal-plunder that perpetually incubates and matures within the confines of wretched socialism. Shall our existing course in the United States if not corrected resolve to impoverished despotism.

Shall the two distorted dichotomies you mention both fall circumstantial to a vast array of interventionist laws which are being passed every “day” immeasurably. Shall it not be an exaggeration that there are forty thousand new laws of socialism being passed every year. Shall these perversions invade our lives for every kind of rescue regarding fairness, safety and morality. Shall vigilance recognize that the influx of socialism perverts every rational outcome, and moves our country to poverty with precision, and yet shall it be the vigilant church that can stand in its path for correction, or continue to be unable to recognize ethics.

Shall the process of socialism in a country be slow for gains of power if the country has strategic constitutional restraint, and can we agree that here in the United States, that Madison rendered many into the constitution and bill of rights. However shall Madison fail to adhere to Henry's warnings of centralized power, and Jefferson's “written” non-aggression, yet did not Madison after ethical contribution mixed with compromise then predict your dichotomies to come true with accuracy?

James Madison
"We are free today substantially but the day will come when our Republic will be an impossibility. It will be impossibility because wealth will be concentrated in the hands of a few. A republic cannot stand upon bayonets, and when that day comes, when the wealth of the nation will be in the hands of a few, then we must rely upon the wisdom of the best elements in the country to readjust the laws of the nation to the changed conditions."

Yet may I add that “ethics” and not issues are the key to readjust?
Click to expand...
Haha I get what you did there
 
Great Fiction said:
I understand your point with more clarity

I should say your conundrums or dichotomies materialize from progressive legal-plunder that perpetually incubates and matures within the confines of wretched socialism. Shall our existing course in the United States if not corrected resolve to impoverished despotism.

Shall the two distorted dichotomies you mention both fall circumstantial to a vast array of interventionist laws which are being passed every “day” immeasurably. Shall it not be an exaggeration that there are forty thousand new laws of socialism being passed every year. Shall these perversions invade our lives for every kind of rescue regarding fairness, safety and morality. Shall vigilance recognize that the influx of socialism perverts every rational outcome, and moves our country to poverty with precision, and yet shall it be the vigilant church that can stand in its path for correction, or continue to be unable to recognize ethics.

Shall the process of socialism in a country be slow for gains of power if the country has strategic constitutional restraint, and can we agree that here in the United States, that Madison rendered many into the constitution and bill of rights. However shall Madison fail to adhere to Henry's warnings of centralized power, and Jefferson's “written” non-aggression, yet did not Madison after ethical contribution mixed with compromise then predict your dichotomies to come true with accuracy?

James Madison
"We are free today substantially but the day will come when our Republic will be an impossibility. It will be impossibility because wealth will be concentrated in the hands of a few. A republic cannot stand upon bayonets, and when that day comes, when the wealth of the nation will be in the hands of a few, then we must rely upon the wisdom of the best elements in the country to readjust the laws of the nation to the changed conditions."

Yet may I add that “ethics” and not issues are the key to readjust?
Click to expand...

There be a whole lot of "Shall's" in your comments.
 
Major said:
There be a whole lot of "Shall's" in your comments.
Click to expand...

In respect of advisory grammatical purview coming from a magnanimous spirit, also one I consider to be a kindred friend in Christ, I “shan't” endeavour to overuse it, lest it resonate to distractions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top