Obviously I meant to ask, 'Can an unbeliever be demon possessed in the Church age?'Demon "Oppression" is always possible. Demon "Possession" of a believer is impossible.
Obviously I meant to ask, 'Can an unbeliever be demon possessed in the Church age?'Demon "Oppression" is always possible. Demon "Possession" of a believer is impossible.
Right, but did they use physical objects to kill the Assyrians or super natural means?2 Kings 19:35 And it came to pass on a certain night that the angel of the LORD went out, and killed in the camp of the Assyrians one hundred and eighty-five thousand; and when [people] arose early in the morning, there were the corpses--all dead.
YES!Obviously I meant to ask, 'Can an unbeliever be demon possessed in the Church age?'
Could it be that they just "spoke" the word and BOOM! In that case a sword would not be needed.Right, but did they use physical objects to kill the Assyrians or super natural means?
Right, but did they use physical objects to kill the Assyrians or super natural means?
Nothing!As spiritual beings with power, they do indeed possess the means by which to move inanimate objects. We're not told if the Assyrians were killed by their own swords, or that they were supernaturally disillusioned and killed one another, or whatever. If the Lord wants them to utilize the power He has given to them to manipulate physical objects, then they will indeed do so.
So, the REAL question is, what would limit their ability to manipulate physical objects?
MM
Yes but the OP is asking if angels can handle physical objects, not if they can speak and all fall down.Could it be that they just "spoke" the word and BOOM! In that case a sword would not be needed.
Ok, then demons can move pigs.YES!
From missionaries’ experiences, with whom I have talked with, tell me that demon possession seems to be related to the worship of heathen idols and the possession of occult materials.
Many people open their lives up to demon involvement through the embracing of some sin or through occultic involvement (either knowingly or unknowingly). Examples may include immorality, drug/alcohol abuse that alters one’s state of consciousness, rebellion, bitterness, and transcendental meditation.
I'm starting with 'can angels manipulate objects (with Scriptural support),.. were having enough trouble with just that.So, the REAL question is, what would limit their ability to manipulate physical objects?
OK. You win.Ok, then demons can move pigs.
Bro.....I am on your side.Yes but the OP is asking if angels can handle physical objects, not if they can speak and all fall down.
Thanks for the clarification.Bro.....I am on your side.
MM said...........
"We're not told if the Assyrians were killed by their own swords, or that they were supernaturally disillusioned and killed one another,"
That is what I was referring to.
I'm starting with 'can angels manipulate objects (with Scriptural support),.. were having enough trouble with just that.
I never thought of limiting them to physical objects. I only wondered if they could handle physical objects.So, that's the target of my inquiry...why would they be limited to manipulating physical objects? What gives indication of such? If that is a possibility, then there would be greater merit for the question you asked.
i believe Hebrews is referring to human messengers as in Mt 25:35.One might ask if an angel can lift a dinner fork off the table to eat with. If an angel manifests all the physical attributes of a physical human in one's home, and do so without their actual nature being detectable to the host, then it would seem reasonable that they can indeed manipulate physical objects, and even eat a meal with us:
Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so [doing] some have unwittingly entertained angels.
2 Kings 19:35
2Ki_19:35, 2Ki_19:36. An angel destroys the Assyrians.
in the morning ... they were all dead corpses — It was the miraculous interposition of the Almighty that defended Jerusalem. As to the secondary agent employed in the destruction of the Assyrian army, it is most probable that it was effected by a hot south wind, the simoon, such as to this day often envelops and destroys whole caravans. This conjecture is supported by 2Ki_19:7 and Jer_51:1. The destruction was during the night; the officers and soldiers, being in full security, were negligent; their discipline was relaxed; the camp guards were not alert, or perhaps they themselves were the first taken off, and those who slept, not wrapped up, imbibed the poison plentifully. If this had been an evening of dissolute mirth (no uncommon thing in a camp), their joy (perhaps for a victory), or “the first night of their attacking the city,” says Josephus, became, by its effects, one means of their destruction [Calmet, Fragments].
Just a thought, but not what you would call an angel.
(Jamison Fawcett Brown)
The Lord did use nature (his creation) as we know. But it does say an angel, so perhaps this explanation is best ignored.
Agreed!I never thought of limiting them to physical objects. I only wondered if they could handle physical objects.
i believe Hebrews is referring to human messengers as in Mt 25:35.
Yep! Agreed.It looks like you got that copy and paste from biblehub.com...
Commentaries sometimes come up with some seriously strange things...to say the least.
MM
Yes, the theological liberal is constantly trying to explain away the miraculous using 'natural' means.Field mice, my foot. All I can say is that it is true, and by a miracle, the Lord's people were kept safe from harm.
.
Are you trying to tell us that the Red Sea was only knee deep??????Yes, the theological liberal is constantly trying to explain away the miraculous using 'natural' means.
Imagine, an Egyptian army complete with horses and chariots drowning in knee-deep water.Are you trying to tell us that the Red Sea was only knee deep??????