This person does understand it: "When an apology is made after 200 years, it's not so much to right a wrong, but to make the person or organization making the apology feel better."
I would also like to know why anyone would think that he is owed an apology for starting a lie that has been universally accepted, while the truth of God's word is being rejected.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.