Climate Crisis Hoax

Many have bought into the idea that the earth's climate is in "crisis," which is easy to spread around like butter on hot toast. The claim that mankind has a measurable effect upon climate is only an effective argument in the minds of the unthinking masses. Most are not scientific in their thinking, and therefore lack the critical thinking skills to see past the false narratives in media and politics, and question the claims that carry with them not one shred of verifiable facts.

 
Many have bought into the idea that the earth's climate is in "crisis," which is easy to spread around like butter on hot toast. The claim that mankind has a measurable effect upon climate is only an effective argument in the minds of the unthinking masses. Most are not scientific in their thinking, and therefore lack the critical thinking skills to see past the false narratives in media and politics, and question the claims that carry with them not one shred of verifiable facts.

Herd mentality!
 
Yes, and appeals to reason does not work either. I was once a vegan and ideologically motivated and believed in all this save the planet stuff. The sneaky political agendas in the news appeal to emotion and works wonders for a crusade. No real feminine presence is immune. Yes animals are sometimes cruelly treated, and it needs to be addressed which I'm fairly sure there are great minds out there working on this. .
So, Whilst I agree with Piers Morgan, i believe he is wasting his time and probably doing more damage. (see, back then, I would have shunned overseas advacadoes and boycotted pilots in my "herd mentality" if he had said this to me) or, gone on a blind rampage and political campaign to begin growing our own advacadoes and therefor using and wasting valuable resources in the process that could have been utilised better. Its good to think things through before you act. But you dont see this when you'd tied up in an ideology.
 
The ultimate demonstration of human hubris is the belief that human beings have the ability to have a significant effect upon the global climate. It smacks of atheism as well as a belief that humankind is equal to God (carryover from the Tower of Babel maybe?).
Yes, and appeals to reason does not work either. I was once a vegan and ideologically motivated and believed in all this save the planet stuff. The sneaky political agendas in the news appeal to emotion and works wonders for a crusade. No real feminine presence is immune. Yes animals are sometimes cruelly treated, and it needs to be addressed which I'm fairly sure there are great minds out there working on this. So, Whilst I agree with Piers Morgan, i believe he is wasting his time and probably doing more damage. (see, back then, I would have shunned overseas advacadoes and boycotted pilots in my "herd mentality" if he had said this to me) or, gone on a blind rampage and political campaign to begin growing our own advacadoes and therefor using and wasting valuable resources in the process that could have been utilised better. Its good to think things through before you act. But you dont see this when you'd tied up in an ideology.

The video was an impressive pushback by Piers Morgan toward the activist's fast talking shallow statement.

Just a thought. So many educated, "worldly" experienced "wannabe" activist columnists, reporters and the like give their professional opinion. The next day when I think about what they said just doesn't sink in.

Granted, my doctor gives me good advice for my health or my realtor who helped us in our investment when we bought a home did impact the decisions we made. Both these have impacted our lives at home.
 
Climate change technically happens every day the reason why it has become such a useful propaganda tool to control society. Carbon emissions may effect humanity some but certainly not the environment as a whole. Our plant greenery thrives on carbon. Bush fires are a natural occurrence another lie inducted into the environmental hall of lies. I’m just reading ip on the 2 ozone holes in the North and South poles from the 80’s and the screams that went up from the environmental movement they were becoming larger due to manufactured pollutants by humanity. This apparently went on for some 10 yrs until it was finally revealed that it was a natural occurrence for both ozone holes to decrease and increase in size and had nothing to do with pollutants destroying the ozone. We hear nothing of it now. In my time it was all about being carted off to watch Al Gores movie inconvenient truth. His prophetic doom & gloom never came to pass I think there be a updated version now . The reality is that Mother Nature be like a kettle gets to hot. The kettle whistles and she eventually rights herself. It be in Gods hand when all shall pass away.
 
The methane alone that is belching up from the ocean floors is so far in excess of anything mankind could release into the atmosphere, that it casts a glaring light of contrast that renders political rhetoric we hear each day utter nonsense!

MM
 
People should be talking about POLLUTION and the effects on the environment and everyones wellbeing not 'climate change'. It's stupid.
 
A lot of these 'climate change' people seem to live in their own little glasshouses where everything is air conditioned or temperate and comfortable have no clue how people in other parts of the world cope or adapt in other latitudes.
 
A lot of these 'climate change' people seem to live in their own little glasshouses where everything is air conditioned or temperate and comfortable have no clue how people in other parts of the world cope or adapt in other latitudes.
Lanolin there be many angles to how people think and many a-genders as well. Many of the alternative energies solar energy or wind farms are not reliable sources of energy and much more expensive . Actually they cost much more when compared to Nuclear, coal or gas. Many wealthy industrialists have their fingers in both pies. Be that traditional or alternative energy. We be the ones that have to foot the Bill. They just happily collect the profits. They be most happy to go along with the climate change game. Some are genuine in their beliefs. For others it be a religion: Mother Earth has become their god. And for others it be merely a method to undermine western civilisation with as much political environmental red tape & expense as possible.
 
Western civilisation isn't THAT civilised. Also why can't it just stay in the west and leave the easterners alone? They are obviously different ways of doing things that work for them because of their environment. Not everyone lives with the same geography.
 
For example, ok there may be a coal seam or gold or whatever in them there hills, but it's underneath a forest that is habitat for birds and trees. Are you going to slash and burn the forest just to extract this gold or coal?

But if coal was just all on the ground or flowing in the rivers, and easily obtainable, or the rivers are rushing and forever generating movement, why not harness this renewable energy - we do in NZ. It's called hydropower.

Solar power works in Australia because of flat land with plenty of sun. They get a lot of sunshine hours.
And wind does work for areas that are very windy. But it won't work everywhere.
Oil can be leaking out of the ground in tar pits or whatever. Some countries have volcanoes and geothermal areas. I think if you have a source of energy thats ok, use it, but if not you will have to buy it from somewhere else - that's why whales were hunted to near extinction for their oil and why Arab countries are now so rich. There is a price peeps need to be aware of.

The pollution is another thing - oil spills, extraction dumping, radioactive waste that causes cancer and acid rain, disturbing wild life habitat. In nz because of the dams built to create hydropower, it was threatening river wildlife. So some environmentalists campaigned to save the snails. True story.

When the forests got cut down forestry just left logs lying around and the rain would fall on slashed forests causing landslips. That's why Gisborne/Hawkes bay area is so devastated, nothing is keeping the soil. It just washes away and all the rivers carry that sediment and silt up the harbours. If people studied ecosystems more and closed the loops it would be better but there is a huge amount of waste people generate that they think just magically disappears into the ether. It doesn't. It has to go somewhere and will affect something else.
 
Western civilisation isn't THAT civilised. Also why can't it just stay in the west and leave the easterners alone? They are obviously different ways of doing things that work for them because of their environment. Not everyone lives with the same geography.
Maybe its just me, but if the "Westerners" left Asia alone in 1940, I have to wonder if Japan would be allowing you to use a computer today on this Forum Site!
 
The methane alone that is belching up from the ocean floors is so far in excess of anything mankind could release into the atmosphere, that it casts a glaring light of contrast that renders political rhetoric we hear each day utter nonsense!

MM
Can you imagine how much methane gas was released by the dinosaurs a billion years ago?

The scientists that study this stuff have guessed that there were roughly 10 Dino's per square kilometer (0.4 square kilometer) of vegetated land. The team's analyses of modern ruminants suggest a Dino might give off about 4.2 pounds (1.9 kilograms) of methane daily and that would have been for about 200 million years.

Of course if anyone is a Young Earther, this would have no application as the Dinos would only have been around a thousand years and died out 5000 years ago.
 
Can you imagine how much methane gas was released by the dinosaurs a billion years ago?

The scientists that study this stuff have guessed that there were roughly 10 Dino's per square kilometer (0.4 square kilometer) of vegetated land. The team's analyses of modern ruminants suggest a Dino might give off about 4.2 pounds (1.9 kilograms) of methane daily and that would have been for about 200 million years.

Of course if anyone is a Young Earther, this would have no application as the Dinos would only have been around a thousand years and died out 5000 years ago.
I guess if we add the entirety of the animal kingdom, the human race. Natural disturbances such as volcanoes gas fissures above and beneath the oceans. Than the past 6-7 thousand yrs makes makes for a lot of hot gas in that alone. The sun continues to make its daily circuit and greets our beautiful earth anew every day.
 
For example, ok there may be a coal seam or gold or whatever in them there hills, but it's underneath a forest that is habitat for birds and trees. Are you going to slash and burn the forest just to extract this gold or coal?

But if coal was just all on the ground or flowing in the rivers, and easily obtainable, or the rivers are rushing and forever generating movement, why not harness this renewable energy - we do in NZ. It's called hydropower.

Solar power works in Australia because of flat land with plenty of sun. They get a lot of sunshine hours.
And wind does work for areas that are very windy. But it won't work everywhere.
Oil can be leaking out of the ground in tar pits or whatever. Some countries have volcanoes and geothermal areas. I think if you have a source of energy thats ok, use it, but if not you will have to buy it from somewhere else - that's why whales were hunted to near extinction for their oil and why Arab countries are now so rich. There is a price peeps need to be aware of.

The pollution is another thing - oil spills, extraction dumping, radioactive waste that causes cancer and acid rain, disturbing wild life habitat. In nz because of the dams built to create hydropower, it was threatening river wildlife. So some environmentalists campaigned to save the snails. True story.

When the forests got cut down forestry just left logs lying around and the rain would fall on slashed forests causing landslips. That's why Gisborne/Hawkes bay area is so devastated, nothing is keeping the soil. It just washes away and all the rivers carry that sediment and silt up the harbours. If people studied ecosystems more and closed the loops it would be better but there is a huge amount of waste people generate that they think just magically disappears into the ether. It doesn't. It has to go somewhere and will affect something else.
Lanolin I do think most in civilised nations they revegetate their Forests and many be national parks. Most farming communities certainly do because their well being depends on it. Through trial and error we have learned what is good for both nature and for us. Accidents happen from time to time. And of course there will always be a depth of depravity and greed of some humans who do choose maximum profit over the proper balance with nature of being good overseers of the world that we were commanded to subdue. The bible has always commanded this, even leaving us instructions of when to cultivate and to leave the land at rest.
 
Last edited:
Lanolin I do think most in civilised nations they revegetate their Forests and many be national parks. Most farming communities certainly do because their well being depends on it. Through trial and error we have learned what is good for both nature and for us. Accidents happen from time to time. And of course there will always be a depth of depravity and greed of some humans who do choose maximum profit over the proper balance with nature of being good overseers of the world that we were commanded to subdue. The bible has always commanded this, even leaving us instructions of when to cultivate and to leave the land at rest.
Having a sabbath is good for all countries - a year where the land just rests. In the Bible it was every 7 years.
I'm not sure about 'subduing' the land or world? That doesn't seem biblical. We are not commanded to do this - I don't remember that.
But I think it was about looking after or being a good steward of it. And also caring for the animals.

I am not sure 'civilised nations' are very many because most lands have been invaded by other nations and been greedy for taking other nations resources or using them as military bases, outposts or toxic dumping grounds. Also a lot of 'colonial' nations just basically used other countries as their personal larder. They thought 'out of sight, out of mind'.

Small holding farms and small businesses are always being squeezed out by the corporate big guys just as little countries are by bigger countries..takeovers are not nice because the foreigners taking over often have little respect for the environment or land they are taking over or the people and wildlife already living there. They are often ignorant about ecoystems and just take take take. Land of Canaan was basically taken from the Canaanites and given to the Israelites because the Canaanites had polluted it with their idols and depraved behaviour. God was like enough, but when the Israelites started doing the same, God made it so they were exiled.
 
Having a sabbath is good for all countries - a year where the land just rests. In the Bible it was every 7 years.
I'm not sure about 'subduing' the land or world? That doesn't seem biblical. We are not commanded to do this - I don't remember that.
But I think it was about looking after or being a good steward of it. And also caring for the animals.

I am not sure 'civilised nations' are very many because most lands have been invaded by other nations and been greedy for taking other nations resources or using them as military bases, outposts or toxic dumping grounds. Also a lot of 'colonial' nations just basically used other countries as their personal larder. They thought 'out of sight, out of mind'.

Small holding farms and small businesses are always being squeezed out by the corporate big guys just as little countries are by bigger countries..takeovers are not nice because the foreigners taking over often have little respect for the environment or land they are taking over or the people and wildlife already living there. They are often ignorant about ecoystems and just take take take. Land of Canaan was basically taken from the Canaanites and given to the Israelites because the Canaanites had polluted it with their idols and depraved behaviour. God was like enough, but when the Israelites started doing the same, God made it so they were exiled.
Lanolin ancient Empires did what they did to establish their authority and their prosperity it was accepted practice to lay claim to the riches of others who they conquered including the booty which was often us. Agreed. The colonial empires certainly done many bad things to in rich themselves be that privately or in the name of her majesty's government . But also under the umbrella of Christianity the colonial empires brought a much better way of life. Including introducing the gospel of Jesus Christ and the gift of eternal life to the far reaches of the world I do believe. Which was a far more favourable empire than any other pagan empire would have given and permitted bordering on extermination for less populated continents or islands . Even before the age of colonial empires the tribal warfare amongst clans and tribes was universal as it was in Australia and NZ too. Perhaps Ernie Dingo a Australian Aboriginal summed it up best in one of his documentaries ( I’m really glad that it was the British that invaded Australia and not someone else ) As to man subduing the world. We do find in Genesis 2: 26 Genesis 2:28. It be a Divine directive to do so . And not only to have dominion over the animal kingdom but for us to go forth and multiply and to have dominion over the entire earth as well. .
 
Last edited:
climate change can be said in these 3 words------END TIME EVENTS.. these are just the beginning of sorrows look at chapter 16 of revaluation the real climate Change
 
Back
Top