PeaceLikeaRiver
Inactive
No one would pray to then if they thought they were dead. So it's just a matter of different beliefs regarding resurrection.There's hope brother. If they're not alive it's because they haven't been resurrected.
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one would pray to then if they thought they were dead. So it's just a matter of different beliefs regarding resurrection.There's hope brother. If they're not alive it's because they haven't been resurrected.
![]()
Is it wrong to read and believe the clear reading of scripture? How does one reach a place of confidence in Gods Word?
How do we know they're alive?
Well it takes a level of study and seeking to reach a point of confidence, but just because folks have different understandings, does not mean that those who are diligent and honest cannot know and be confident in the truth.
There is not one single passage in the Bible, not a single one, where I do not consider that another possibility is being communicated besides the one I suspect. Also context is supremely important - and when I see people stealing certain lines from scripture which rely so heavily on what was said immediately before them or right after, but taken alone to have their meanings made more vague, all I want to do is return to the source to see the full picture of what has been said.
If it were so easy, why don't more denominations do it? Shall I even bring up the book of Revelations? How many different interpretations are there of that?
Most denominations believe in the Trinity and the major items, but what about something like divorce?
The RCC absolutely forbids divorce, even for adultery, because Christ uses the term "pornia" instead of "moicheía" the former means fornication or immorality while the latter means adultery. The reasoning being, that Christ meant divorce was only permitted if the marriage was invalid (that is it was really just "pornia"). Most protestants translate it as adultery. But even this opens up a whole can of worms, did Christ mean this as an absolute provision or only just generally? For instance, can a woman divorce if her husband beats her? It all depends on one's interpretation.
Does "heavens" refer to the heaven we go to after we die, or does it mean the "heavens" as in the solar system and night sky?What About Genesis 1:1??
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth".
What is the other possibility that is being communicated by that verse? Just asking?
Well, from my perspective, you're not asking the "dead" anything, because we don't consider Mary and the saints to be dead, but very much alive in heaven. In the case of intercessory prayer, you're asking someone with favored status with God to convey a message. I don't think there's any danger in getting demons involved.
Does "heavens" refer to the heaven we go to after we die, or does it mean the "heavens" as in the solar system and night sky?
How did you come to be a Christian?
1. Is it wrong to read and believe the clear reading of scripture? 2. How does one reach a place of confidence in Gods Word?
Eph 3:12 In whom we have boldness and access with confidence by the faith of him.
I'm glad you're back @Major![]()
1. No. We just need common sense to grasp that the bible is God's word translated into human vocabulary. When it says God is good. It means, God is good. The word ''good'' being an easily understood human term. The intention of God penning His word for us would never be to confuse us. God does not lie. God does not deceive.
2. By judging oneself 1 Cor 11:31 in fear and trembling Phil 2:12 on what we know scripture to be Rom 2:14-15. Whilst I like to think that truthful self judgment in fear and trembling will cause us all to know that scripture never excuses continuing in mortal sins, the sad reality is that some minds are so twisted and lost that for them it actually does. That is where as Christians we have moved on with the Holy Spirit. Where verses in Rom 2:14-15 are now replaced by the latter verses 18-20 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.
Is it wrong to read and believe the clear reading of scripture? How does one reach a place of confidence in Gods Word?
Eph 3:12 In whom we have boldness and access with confidence by the faith of him.
The point is, how can anyone NOT have questions? The Bible isn't a book where the author is handy to give a phone call to to ask for a simple clarification. Add to that the passage of a lot of time, the translation, the interpretation, the context both historical and verbal...
I really have no idea what Moses meant, and that's the point of what I'm saying. People are terribly sure about a lot of things that I don't really see that it's possible to be terribly sure about. Which is why I tend to be very suspicious of people who claim to know 100% about them. We are dealing with the passage of a lot of time, translations, retranslations, mistranslations. Best we can do is to make our best guesses and remain open to the possibility we are incorrect about them.IN the context of the verses, what do you think it means.
Do you think that Moses was writing about where we go when we die, or creation?
I really have no idea what Moses meant, and that's the point of what I'm saying. People are terribly sure about a lot of things that I don't really see that it's possible to be terribly sure about. Which is why I tend to be very suspicious of people who claim to know 100% about them. We are dealing with the passage of a lot of time, translations, retranslations, mistranslations. Best we can do is to make our best guesses and remain open to the possibility we are incorrect about them.
I am not calling anyone wrong. I am stating the importance in allowing yourself to BE wrong, especially when we are talking about matters as old as this where absolute true meaning is difficult, if not impossible, to know.If that is what you think....fine with me.
When I read the context of what Moses wrote it seems clear to me that he was talking about Creation.
When it comes to fundamental, essential doctrinal teachings, IMO it is real good to be 100% right. I do not want to guess on essential doctrinal matters which is why I depend on God's Word more than mans opinions. Now that is just me.
I'm sure of nothing except the word of God and still I wrestle with it. The word speaks against what we see and experience, but that only means I am wrong, not the word of God. It's a silly example, but for two years I wrestled with the seeming contradiction between Acts 7:4 and Genesis 11-12. Two years I couldn't reconcile the dating. But I knew there had to be an answer because I really believed that the word of God was (is) without error, but I couldn't figure it out. Then I found the truth and I had my reconciliation. That is what faith is, evidence of things not seen. I knew the word of God is true, I just needed faith, and patience. The Holy Spirit helped me. Let Him help you. We can only give you ideas, but God knows what you need. Trust Him, not us.I really have no idea what Moses meant, and that's the point of what I'm saying. People are terribly sure about a lot of things that I don't really see that it's possible to be terribly sure about. Which is why I tend to be very suspicious of people who claim to know 100% about them. We are dealing with the passage of a lot of time, translations, retranslations, mistranslations. Best we can do is to make our best guesses and remain open to the possibility we are incorrect about them.