In the OT God's word had the backing of the Holy Spirit.
People would follow the word and God would back them, sometimes with spectacular results.
Prophets would speak or write according to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
They would also predict a day when God would write his law in our hearts.
The night Jesus was born, the angels proclaimed the offering of grace to all flesh.
Some 30 yrs later Jesus proclaimed the coming of God's kingdom with many miracles confirming his every word.
In pentecost you now had many proclaiming the word backed by signs and wonders, all through the same Spirit.
So, do we choose one over the other or do we simply accept that the two are one?
People would follow the word and God would back them, sometimes with spectacular results.
Prophets would speak or write according to the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
They would also predict a day when God would write his law in our hearts.
The night Jesus was born, the angels proclaimed the offering of grace to all flesh.
Some 30 yrs later Jesus proclaimed the coming of God's kingdom with many miracles confirming his every word.
In pentecost you now had many proclaiming the word backed by signs and wonders, all through the same Spirit.
So, do we choose one over the other or do we simply accept that the two are one?