You are obviously quoting from a Bible that was translated by Trinitarians. The reality is that that's not what Jesus said at John 8:58.John 8:58 NKJV
Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are obviously quoting from a Bible that was translated by Trinitarians. The reality is that that's not what Jesus said at John 8:58.John 8:58 NKJV
Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
I disagree. GOD told this to Moses in response to the question Who shall I say sent me. It would make no sense for Moses to go to the Israelites and tell them that I Am sent him with explaining who I am was. In addition, and most importantly, in Genesis chapter 2, we are introduced to another actor YHWH, acting upon the creation in conjunction with Elohim from chapter 1, but since we know that only God can create, Elohim and YHWH must be the same personality. Now in the context of the chapter does repeating "I Am" over and over make any sense if God is simply stressing his existence. No. YHWH is the covenant name for Elohim.The expression "I am" is merely a declaration of one's existence and individuality. Nothing more. It is not a personal name.
I have news for you. Both Modalism and Unitarianism are blasphemous heresies. Now that we have unmasked you, you will not find a receptive audience for your heretical ideas.You are obviously quoting from a Bible that was translated by Trinitarians. The reality is that that's not what Jesus said at John 8:58.
We have a some kind of non-triniarian cultist on board who denies that YHWH is God's name and claims that Jesus never used I am to identify himself as God.And your point is..................
God, Yahweh> stated to Moses that it was His "real" name thoughThe expression "I am" is merely a declaration of one's existence and individuality. Nothing more. It is not a personal name.
Yes, Unitarianism, Oneness, Modalism Arianism are all damnable heresiesI have news for you. Both Modalism and Unitarianism are blasphemous heresies. Now that we have unmasked you, you will not find a receptive audience for your heretical ideas.
That would make his Jesus not the One of the bibleWe have a some kind of non-triniarian cultist on board who denies that YHWH is God's name and claims that Jesus never used I am to identify himself as God.
The expression "I am" is merely a declaration of one's existence and individuality. Nothing more. It is not a personal name.
I disagree. GOD told this to Moses in response to the question Who shall I say sent me. It would make no sense for Moses to go to the Israelites and tell them that I Am sent him with explaining who I am was. In addition, and most importantly, in Genesis chapter 2, we are introduced to another actor YHWH, acting upon the creation in conjunction with Elohim from chapter 1, but since we know that only God can create, Elohim and YHWH must be the same personality. Now in the context of the chapter does repeating "I Am" over and over make any sense if God is simply stressing his existence. No. YHWH is the covenant name for Elohim.
And? What's that got to do with the fact that Christendom's Trinity isn't supported by scripture? Do tell.You are obviously quoting from a Bible that was translated by Trinitarians. The reality is that that's not what Jesus said at John 8:58.
I have news for you. Both Modalism and Unitarianism are blasphemous heresies. Now that we have unmasked you, you will not find a receptive audience for your heretical ideas.
Stop being dramatic. You can only unmask someone trying to hide. And obviously, I made no attempt at hiding the fact that I don't agree with teachings not supported by scripture.I have news for you. Both Modalism and Unitarianism are blasphemous heresies. Now that we have unmasked you, you will not find a receptive audience for your heretical ideas.