Man-Made Climate Change - Myth or Fact

Is man-made climate change claims based on fact or myth

  • MYTH

  • FACT

Results are only viewable after voting.
Musicmaster

Musicmaster

This is a good observation, but it stabs at the calculations for cost being hypothesized, but never proven as fact.


However, before we even get to this point, we should FIRST be asking to what extent mankind is affecting the climate, if at all. All I have been hearing through the decades is that man is the blame for the changes, and yet no body of science has yet produced any metrics based upon solid and sound science that man is affecting the climate, especially in relation to the billions of tons of methane, CO2, sulphur, and all the other toxins and greenhouse gasses being poured out into the atmosphere by nature itself from all the oceans, rivers, lakes and active volcanoes. BILLIONS of tons, folks...that scientists have admitted that mankind could not produce in 100,000 years.



My vote is MYTH
 
I voted myth because I dont have enough facts yet.

Although, (though I am not certain), I think the sun spots, and EM radiation travelling to earth would affects us.

after all the heat, and stuff, possibly a cooling.

doubt that us little ants are affecting any real changes though.
 
Best explanation for climate change I've heard is that it goes in cycles. The movement of the stars and planets run like a Swiss watch and gravity has an affect on the tilt of the earth on its axis. It will heat and cool in this cycle. Man made climate change theory is a scam. Look who is heavily invested in "green" energy. Follow the money.
 
LearningToLetGo said:
Exactly. It's all one big transfer of money.
Click to expand...
Al Gore made a pile of money flying around in his private jet giving speeches on how we mere mortals shouldnt drive gas powered cars. Investing in green energy and selling short has been a money maker for the left for sometime. It became blatantly obvious in the Obama years.
 
Hopefull said:
Al Gore made a pile of money flying around in his private jet giving speeches on how we mere mortals shouldnt drive gas powered cars. Investing in green energy and selling short has been a money maker for the left for sometime. It became blatantly obvious in the Obama years.
Click to expand...
I have no problem with green energy if it’s all about an more efficient lifestyle.

But we can’t even dispose of these green equipments without ridiculous costs and damage to the environment. So it’s not even better.
 
It's all pretty much built on a godless, God denying, Bible denying assumption that ultimately this earth can be saved, thus denying this ultimate global warming fact...

But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
(2Pe 3:10)

But let them go on playing in their Scripture denying utopia, some day they will wake up.
 
crossnote said:
Computer models churn out neither facts or data, but as the old saying goes, "Garbage In-Garbage Out". (GIGO)
Besides, the climate is always changing.
Click to expand...
1661106442383.png
Source..........https://shalemag.com/manmade-global-warming-the-story-the-reality/

Quote from Tom Crews in movie...........
"Follow the Money"!!!!

Government published statistics show that $178 billion dollars of taxpayer funds has been spent on direct climate change related technology, science and funds given to other nations as a result of the climate change deception, from 1993 to 2017. The government has systematically enabled the continuation of this fraud through billions of dollars spent annually by funding university research and government labs doing “climate research.”

The false notion of AGW and/or man induced climate change has spawned tens of thousands of new businesses worldwide. The total Climate-Industrial Complex is a $2-trillion-per-year business. These companies are virtually 100% dependent on the politically driven notion of “dangerous man made global warming and climate change.”
 
Hopefull said:
Science is funded by grants. Who funds the climate change research?
Click to expand...
According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”

A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
Source:https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary

So---who's funding it.......YOU are!
 
My last position before retirement (2009) supported a weather project for the FAA. I remember someone mentioning climate change to a meteorologist who's desk was close to mine. He went on a 15 minute discussion about how it all depends on how one defines climate, and what measurments one uses to track it, and how long one considers it.

The guts of this is that weather itself is what is happening at a particular place at a particular time. The weather an hour ago is an historical datum. The weather an hour from now is a prediction. The weather at one end of town can be quite different from the other end, even in a small town.

But climate is not well defined in this way. Generaly, it is weather over an extended period of time. so the events we see today such as resevoirs and rivers drying up around the world and sea levels rising do not necessarily mean a change in overall climate when measued in multi decade timeframes. What length of time period to use depends on what one is trying to measure, and that even there is is used in more comparative ways and not according to a static, well defined scale.

Seatle, Washington has a colder climate than Los Angeles, California, but a warmer climate than Nome, Alaska.

More humid areas seem hotter than areas with similar temperatures but less humidity.

So, how does one measure climate so that change can be detected?

What would be demonstrably true if Climate Change is real that is not true now?

Even here it leaves untouched the question of IF the climate is changing, how much of it is from man's activities.
 
Major said:
According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”

A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
Source:https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary

So---who's funding it.......YOU are!
Click to expand...

Major said:
According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”

A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
Source:https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary

So---who's funding it.......YOU are!
Click to expand...
I think you see my point but I will ask this anyway. Who is shoving the tax payer dollars at the research? Would the results be skewed to keep the money coming? I believe any research debunking climate change would not be published and the researcher would be looking for funding for another project.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top