My question is why cross the Suez Gulf of the Red Sea at all when the Suez isthmus had plenty of dry ground upon which to cross. I view an alternative crossing point as the Gulf of Aqaba (also part of the Red Sea) between the Sinai peninsula and the Arabian peninsula. Of course, that would place Mt. Sinai as being on the Arabian peninsula rather than the Sinai peninsula. After all, there is a lot more room to wander aimlessly 40 years in the vast wilderness of Arabia rather than in the limited space of the Sinai.
Hello BibleLover;
I've asked the same question. There were so many different routes God could have commanded Moses to take, different parts of the Red Sea and other dry land routes.
Regarding a lot more room, Israel is geographically very small but it seems there is so much room when we learn the many different "names" of their cities, provinces and inheritances.
God bless you, BibleLover.
Bob