Don't hold me to it, but I thought I read somewhere that Luke and Acts comprise around 28% of the NT. I think Paul has more books in the NT but the actual content may not be as much since many of his are short letters.
Under this thought process, John should be the only book in the Bible. I think you are wrong to question if the book of Luke is supposed to be in the Bible. The WHOLE Bible is the inspired word of God. Not just bits and pieces.if it was important john would have wrote it,
Amen:israel:Amen Amen :dance:Amen :shepherd:Those who know the Lord can't contain it...yipppeeeee! Touched by the holy spirit, they have to sing it, dance it, write it, shout it, dream it, sleep it, rest in it, pray with it, eat it, drink it, share it.