Then why start a controversial discussion?
What you said in your OP contradicts with what Paul says in 1 Tim 2:13-14 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
No-one, made a valid point and I would like to hear you answer his question in post #2.
I have found that much of what Paul says contradicts other parts of the Bible unless you look at it closely and consider it's context. Sometimes Paul even seemingly contradicts himself. Why value Paul's notes on the OT more than the OT itself? That doesn't make sense to me. Especially since Paul is using the OT here to make a point. Just because Paul, the man, doesn't point out Adam's failure, doesn't mean Adam didn't fail. Right?
(Edited because the quote thing went wrong)