Peter was The Apostle to the Jews in Jerusalem..not unto the Gentiles.
Show me One Scripture where Peter is actually in Rome. Paul, not Peter was the Apostle to Rome. This is made up by the RCC to connect them to Rome ( The Vatican) and falsifying their teaching that Peter was their first Pope..No Proof...ZEROthat's a new take ..
Peter was the Apostle to the Jews in Rome ..
Peter addressed two of his letters to the Thessalonians of Paul's church ..
and Paul addressed Romans to the Romans of Peter's church ..
and Priscilla and Aquila were already believers coming from Italy when Paul met them (Act 18:2) ..
then Paul went to Rome to help Peter because it took both of them to actually get the church in the Lions jaw started so it would not die ..
then we have Jesus prophesying of Peters death ..
which tradition confirms it as so and Paul's death in Rome as well ..
as well as Peter making an analogy of Rome as Babylon ..
I think your claim has no substantiation ..
Another little Revelation in Galatians 1 17-19 Paul visited James " The Lord' s BROTHER". Which proves " Virgin" Mary was only a Virgin until she gave birth to Jesus ( Matthew 1 v 25). The Scriptures tell us she and Joseph later had 4 sons and daughters but do not say their names ( Matthew 13 v 55 & 56) Notice one of Mary' s Sons was JAMES the Step Brother of Jesus, and an Apostle...Bummer for Catholic Teachings, That Mary was a perpetual Virgin after Jesus was born..Show me One Scripture where Peter is actually in Rome. Paul, not Peter was the Apostle to Rome. This is made up by the RCC to connect them to Rome ( The Vatican) and falsifying their teaching that Peter was their first Pope..No Proof...ZERO
Here, however is what Scripture tells us with Paul and Peter in it...
verses 18 & 19 ( Paul Speaking) "Then After THREE YEARS I ( Paul) went up to JERUSALEM TO SEE PETER, and abode with him 15 days. But other Apostles saw I none, save JAMES THE LORD' S BROTHER"
Now, There is your scripture. Ask yourself this Question: If Peter was The Apostle to The Gentiles in Rome.. Why would Apostle Paul go spend 15 days with him in Jerusalem? Why wasen' t it stated like this: " And After 3 Years, I visited Peter in Rome?" ...Simple, Peter was based in Jerusalem not Rome.
Was Peter in Jerusalem visiting the Other Apostles? not hardly. Especially if he was a
" Pope" as The Vatican claims. No, you are wrong...Paul was The Apostle in Rome, where he later was Martyred.. ( Foxe' s Book of Martyrs)
Show me One Scripture where Peter is actually in Rome. Paul, not Peter was the Apostle to Rome. This is made up by the RCC to connect them to Rome ( The Vatican) and falsifying their teaching that Peter was their first Pope..No Proof...ZERO
actually, I gave you the proof, it is you who give no proof contrary ..
Here, however is what Scripture tells us with Paul and Peter in it...
verses 18 & 19 ( Paul Speaking) "Then After THREE YEARS I ( Paul) went up to JERUSALEM TO SEE PETER, and abode with him 15 days. But other Apostles saw I none, save JAMES THE LORD' S BROTHER"
Now, There is your scripture.
that is not proof .. that is PRE-EVANGELISM ..
that proof is like saying, here is Proof Paul was not in Greece ..
Ask yourself this Question: If Peter was The Apostle to The Gentiles in Rome..
I already stated Peter was the Apostle to the JEWS in Rome ..
Why would Apostle Paul go spend 15 days with him in Jerusalem?
once again your logic has chronology flaws ..
Why wasen' t it stated like this: " And After 3 Years, I visited Peter in Rome?"
because when Peter and Paul were in Jerusalem, that was BEFORE Paul went back to Greece (later to Rome) and Peter went to Rome ..
...Simple, Peter was based in Jerusalem not Rome.
fine .. then so was Paul based in Jerusalem ..
Was Peter in Jerusalem visiting the Other Apostles? not hardly. Especially if he was a
" Pope" as The Vatican claims.
Peter NEVER was the bishop in Rome (nor a Pope) .. that position is not enumerated in History until mid third century (papa) .. the church merely ascribes that title forward ..
No, you are wrong...
no you are wrong .. you still have given ZERO evidence to support your claim ..
Another little Revelation in Galatians 1 17-19 Paul visited James " The Lord' s BROTHER". Which proves " Virgin" Mary was only a Virgin until she gave birth to Jesus ( Matthew 1 v 25).
actually I believe those were his half-brothers (children of Joseph and Mary) .. however it proves NOTHING .. they still could have been prior children of Joseph's ..
however, Mat 1:25 pretty much proves Mary did not remain a virgin ..
The Scriptures tell us she and Joseph later had 4 sons and daughters but do not say their names ( Matthew 13 v 55 & 56)
no it doesn't .. it does NOT say they were hers .. but I think they were ..
as you can see, they thought Jesus WAS Joseph's son ..
and they do give the names ..
Mat 13:55 James, Joseph, Simon and Judas
also here ..
Mar 6:3 James, Joses, Judas and Simon
Notice one of Mary' s Sons was JAMES the Step Brother of Jesus, and an Apostle...
that James was NOT an Apostle ..
there are 3 James .. 2 Apostles and 1 Jesus half-brother ..
it's ok .. many get the 3 James' mixed up ..
Bummer for Catholic Teachings, That Mary was a perpetual Virgin after Jesus was born..
are you gloating ???
bummer for you .. you still have not proved you are correct on a few points ..
You are stating Catholic Teachings not scripture. I see nowhere in the Scripturesthere is no data to support Peter was
But...But...We are talking about " JAMES, THE LORD' S BROTHER"! not anyone ele' s cousin, Brother, or blood kin.....JESUS' BROTHER!!....So you don' t want to admit THIS JAMES is not THE LORD' S BROTHER? or perhaps Paul was tired from his long trip from Rome to Jerausalem, and simply made a mistake in idenity?..yea, right.these two James are also called James the greater, and James the lesser ..
JAMES the greater - brother to John, called Boanerges (meaning "sons of thunder" son of Zebedee, from Sea of Galilee
(Mat 10:2, Mar 1:16 & 3:17, Luk 6:14)
JAMES the lesser - brother to Matthew, son of Alphaeus, from Nazareth in Galilee
(Mat 10:3, Mar 2:14 & 3:18, Luk 6:15, Act 1:13)
note: it was John's brother James who was head of the Church of Jerusalem ..
and part of the "inner circle" of the 3 Apostles Jesus took on special occasions ..
actually, that is a many faceted answer ..
Eph 2:20 having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone,
Eph 2:21 in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing into a holy temple in the Lord,
Eph 2:22 in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit.
we have free will to accept or reject God ..
we also are told to preach the Gospel ..
and by that preaching, others will also believe ..
those who are bishops, elders and decons have a responsibility (as we do too) to preach that Gospel as it was handed down to us ..
the Apostles whom Jesus told to build the church are who gave us the Gospel ..
I have always felt that any you may lead to the Lord, become a responsibility to you that they are then not led astray or lose heart .. so we should keep a fellowship with any that you do lead to the Lord .. for a newbie to than fall away is a heart breaking thing ..
God Bless you ..
Peter was The Apostle to the Jews in Jerusalem..not unto the Gentiles.
Catholics are given a white round wafer at their services.
The Wafer God....
Catholics are given a white round wafer at their services. They are told that the priest magically calls down The Lord from his throne in heaven and at the beck and call of their priest Jesus enters into the Wafer (Communion) and the Catholic believer receives Jesus. Silly me, I thought Jesus came into us through The Holy Ghost/ Spirit. This idea is called transubtination. Where did this idea originate from? Certainly no Bible I have read supports such an idea to receive Jesus.
This idea was " borrowed" from the ancient Egyptians who used this same idea to give their religious followers the 3 God Trinity of the Sun...Isis..Horus...Seb. Pagan worship of the Sun God Trinity...
Normally I agree with what you are saying 100%. When Catholics however come here and twist and pervert what the Gospel actually says, then it is time to bring forth this verse spoken by Jesus.....John 8: 32 " And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free".Beloved Brother, "Let the dead bury the dead." But to those who are alive in Christ Jesus, to us is commended to preach the gospel that saves!