As long as that Pie is to serve Christ and lead people to Christ, then we may be in the same pie.
Not for me to say. I may think I am and not be. I can't bother myself with that, I can only run the race and be willing to be corrected.
Those outside the church aren't for us to judge, 1 cor 5 or 2 cor 5. Those inside the Church not only are you to judge but share the judgement so you both may learn. Examples to elders in the pastoral letters, example of Paul to Peter, example of Matt 18 if one sins against you go to them.... Scripture is used to teach and rebuke, all of those require some judgement. Judging isn't bad. Being convinced your judgement is as God's is, and not willing to budge is wrong.
1Co 14:2
For he who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God. For
Ok, gotcha. That's just one type of tongues speaking. That's what threw me, we know it's just one of the several types by the phrase, "
For no one hears, but in spirit he speaks mysteries. " This is a tongue that isn't voiced by the mouth of man, but is the Spirit uttering inside of you, praying/talking to God for your needs. If someone is speaking out loud, claiming this is what they are doing, they are just not right.
We should also take note the gifts mentioned in Corinthians and Galations is not an exhaustive list. Nowhere does Paul say these are all the gifts.
I agree with this statement. I claim the gift of Agitation, which is partially tongue in cheek, but also dead on a gift, if not by my title for it.

However I said I see no place that you are required to have a gift to be filled by the Spirit. The verse you offered showed you should desire one, maybe even seek one, but not that if you don't have one you aren't filled with the Spirit. And GIFTS/FRUITS are not the same thing. I think we'll agree on that, right?
In context, it's only a sin if it's left as angry and not reconciled. If Angry is a sin, then Jesus is not the Christ as He sinned numerous times, and sinning and being the messiah are contraindicative.
The Eph verse says the same with, "
Be angry, and do not sin. Do not let the sun go down upon your wrath," it's keeping the anger that is the sin. Or, NOT FORGIVING, you must forgive to be forgiven, yes?
Bringing scripture to someone is an act of love - there are many other ways to love somebody. Bringing scripture which can change their lives for the better can be an act of love or done in love.
Good we are dead on the same page then. ALthough I'd say the more important part of love is exemplified in the last parable in matt 25.
"ON" vs "IN" = symantics. As long as the Holy Spirit is working in us, it does not really matter what terminology we use.
If I pour medicine ON you, rather than have you consume it and get it IN you, the effects are very different. It's much more than symantics. If the Spirit is INDWELLING YOU, the SINFUL NATURE/FLESH/SARX is gone, absent, no longer there. The Spirit works ON YOU, to get you to the point where He is INDWELLING you. Romans 8:9 is Him in you. Gal 5:18 is Him ON you, leading you from the outside.... People insist they are indwelled by the SPirit because their preacher told them they were, but also insist they are still in the flesh and will be until they die, despite what scripture says. People tend to just want ot claim every good thought in hopes it's right, rather than take the time and focus the energy to get it right. This is not a condemnation of you, just in big generalities.
No. Knowledge is something we aquire through study or revelation of the Holy Spirit. Sanctification is the process of changing us into the image of Christ.
Excellent. We are in the same boat there too.
Quite right, as Christians we cannot change ourselves but we do play a part in it.
YES, Synergism, vs Monergism. Who parted the red sea, Noah? Moses? or God?
BTW. I have never gone to a prostitute - Just an example
There is a huge difference though, in a person who stops going to appease the commands, and a changed person who has no desire to go. Heart of stone to flesh, changed heart, and mind, not just forced obedience. See my point?