I've read it, and I find the author's arguments in favour of musical instruments purely to be based on a criticism of the apparent inconsistencies of others, and not on the scriptures. The idea that sung psalms have to be accompanied by musical instruments is the mind of man and rationalism at work. There are sects of Christendom in which the only music is the Biblical Psalms, sung without musical accompaniment. Of course, I don't see the scriptural basis for that either. Psalms are the result of experience, and we each have our own psalms: we don't simply have to repeat portions of the Old Testament set to music. As for the rest of the article, I don't think it even needs to be refuted, considering its weakness. That sort of thinking really is dangerous, reasoning from the mind of man and not from knowledge of divine things.Grant Melville, please read this, as your beliefs are in line with the Church of Christ sect:
http://www.jesusmyglory.net/FALSE_DOCTRINES_REFUTED.html
I don't know about this so-called Church of Christ, and I don't agree with holding sectarian ground, which is unscriptural.