Good for you.........it hasn"t.
Because you hold to partial preterism, you believe that the prophecies in Daniel, Matt. 24, and Revelation (with the exception of the last two or three chapters) have already been fulfilled and were fulfilled no later than the first century AD.
According to partial preterism, there is no rapture, and passages describing the tribulation and the Antichrist are actually referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD and the Roman emperor Titus. Partial preterists do believe in the return of Christ to earth and a future resurrection and judgment, but they do not teach a millennial kingdom or that Israel as a nation has a place in God’s future plan. According to partial preterists, the Bible’s references to “the last days” are speaking of the last days of the Old Jewish Covenant, not the last days of the earth itself.
I have read the book too!
no on some things; this is why not to use labels.
If anything, the anti-messiah must be Jewish, and deceive his own people. 3 of them were seen in the Jewish War, 66+. John of Gischala in Galilee wrested the most control. The greatest national help Jesus was to his people was not to try to resist Rome, but to work in his mission. All Jewish anti-messiahs of the time tried to fight Rome, Acts 5 (Judas the Galilean); they even fought themselves, even when there was no food in Jerusalem! They started eating babies!
The NT is full of references that that generation was the last times. Acts 2. In Lk 23:38, the babies nursing at that time would (as adults) see their city plundered and men calling on the mountains to fall on them as an improvement. This is repeated again in the Rev, which has a way of dating it.
The NT clearly distances itself from the race-nation. A son of God is not born of descendancy or flesh. The faith-based group is everything. It includes Gentiles who believe. See the technical terms in Ephesians 2 through 3. Citizenship, membership, partnership, commonwealth, share, inheritance, you name it.