Hello there,
When a member says that they have inquired of the Lord concerning a passage of Scripture, and have received knowledge concerning it. The knowledge then given is very difficult to refute, for it appears that in doing so, one is calling in question a revelation of the Holy Spirit: or suggesting that the person entering it has been mistaken; in ascribing the apparent 'knowledge' given, to that beloved source. In either case offence is caused.
* What should determine the assurance that a word being given regarding a text of Scripture, is indeed of the Spirit, and not a matter of personal interpretation?
I would value your input.
In Christ Jesus
Complete
When a member says that they have inquired of the Lord concerning a passage of Scripture, and have received knowledge concerning it. The knowledge then given is very difficult to refute, for it appears that in doing so, one is calling in question a revelation of the Holy Spirit: or suggesting that the person entering it has been mistaken; in ascribing the apparent 'knowledge' given, to that beloved source. In either case offence is caused.
* What should determine the assurance that a word being given regarding a text of Scripture, is indeed of the Spirit, and not a matter of personal interpretation?
I would value your input.
In Christ Jesus
Complete
Last edited: