A video from Ray Comfort...
That he has been lambasted for "creatively editing".
Are you drunk?
nope, im actually listening closely on how you attack the arguer instead of the argument... = ) )
...so cute
A video from Ray Comfort...
That he has been lambasted for "creatively editing".
Are you drunk?
Get over yourself. This is Ray Comfort we are talking about. He is a famous fraud. Almost as bad as Ken Ham.nope, im actually listening closely on how you attack the arguer instead of the argument... = ) )
...so cute
Ken Ham is awesome!Get over yourself. This is Ray Comfort we are talking about. He is a famous fraud. Almost as bad as Ken Ham.
Lol. I don't know Ray Comfort but Ken Ham is a joke. I can't stand that man.Get over yourself. This is Ray Comfort we are talking about. He is a famous fraud. Almost as bad as Ken Ham.
So you recognise that evolution is true, but you disagree with natural selection?
Edit: Or is it abiogenesis that you have a problem with?
*
the theory of evolution states that all living organism came from a common ancestor. which is proven to be not possible because of the incapability of living organisms, humans for instance, to add genetic information, we can only lose genetic information, we cannot gain it.
So we should ignore all of science and live in blissful ignorance?Has anyone researched the historical origin of "science"???
For those who want the primary research documentation, just ask. For the rest, I will cut to the chase:
Science was born of the combination of alchemy and religion.
You are assuming that we would be "in blissful ignorance" without man's science.So we should ignore all of science and live in blissful ignorance?
You are since you are implying science is evil.You are assuming that we would be "in blissful ignorance" without man's science.
No, I said science is of men (i. e. alchemy + religion)....you are implying science is evil.
Then scientists are the evil ones, and not science itself? Say what you want to say and stop dancing around.No, I said science is of men (i. e. alchemy + religion).
And things are not sin.
People are alienated from God's Truth by the apparent conflict between science and religion more than by any other single cause. They argue that science is moving ahead, religion is retreating. Science is the hope of the world, religion is hypnotized by her concern with another world. Science is interested in real problems, religion is concerned about problems - many of which seem to be wholly unreal. Hence they conclude, "Why bother with religion?"Then scientists are the evil ones, and not science itself? Say what you want to say and stop dancing around.
Then scientists are the evil ones, and not science itself? Say what you want to say and stop dancing around.
You are assuming that we would be "in blissful ignorance" without man's science.
Some of the most innovative scientists were not only Christian, but men of the cloth. There are about 30 craters on the moon named after Jesuits for their scientific research. A Catholic monk named Greggor Mendel discovered genetics. A Jesuit priest discovered the Big Bang theory.
It's true that many Christians differ on many parts of science, and that's fine -- science isn't theology -- theology is far more important. But science is exploration of God's creation. The science-vs-religion myth is, well, a myth.
I'm more concerned for one's relationship with God than I am about their knowledge or believe in scientific discoveries and theories. That said, science is a great thing.
I agree, any one truly seeking truth, and not theories based on junk science will eventually wind up finding God.