I have become quite disenchanted with skip-around teaching. That's when a person is not anchored in a passage, and just cherry picks the 'fun' sounding passages and strings them together. Their meaning can be outrageously off. A Bible teacher should realize that there is already an abundance of narrative to teach through; those are reality saved for us for all ages, to teach the faith. But there are also doctrinal passages and letters where some real-life situations are needed to help. So it is not as though a teacher 'needs' to skip-around to make things interesting.
If a teacher honestly does not 'get' a passage (let's say the 'which is easier' miracle of Mk 2 and Mt 8), then he should not hop around like a sparrow to grab one phrase here and another there until time is up. He should get out the books and find out what the thing truly means and declare that to the students. If we don't do that we are seriously weakening the Bible, turning it into a collection of unrelated magical sayings until we connect them. That's not what it is.
If a teacher honestly does not 'get' a passage (let's say the 'which is easier' miracle of Mk 2 and Mt 8), then he should not hop around like a sparrow to grab one phrase here and another there until time is up. He should get out the books and find out what the thing truly means and declare that to the students. If we don't do that we are seriously weakening the Bible, turning it into a collection of unrelated magical sayings until we connect them. That's not what it is.