Throughout the gospel of John. When John is referring to "the disciple that Jesus loved".Are there other examples in the scriptures where the speaker talks about himself in the 3rd person?
That's right! I forgot! ThanksThroughout the gospel of John. When John is referring to "the disciple that Jesus loved".
Are there other examples in the scriptures where the speaker talks about himself in the 3rd person?
Throughout the gospel of John. When John is referring to "the disciple that Jesus loved".
Anytime! [emoji2]That's right! I forgot! Thanks
Isn't that amazing, the Jews acknowledge Yeshua without even knowing it.I found this video that explains how the Passover is like a rapture.
The Haggadah is the text that sets the order of the Passover meal. An ancient haggadah was found in Europe with a different text.
The first matzah had to be pointing towards the world (other at the table) meaning it was a triangle cut. The base at the father and the point towards the others at the table, meaning from the Father to the world (Jesus being sent to the world by God). The next piece of matzah was placed on top of that with the point facing the father, meaning He is returning to God in heaven, symbolically. This pattern represents the Star of David, albeit before it was called that. However the triangle in ancient days represented the Priests, Levites, and Israel, a ruling by Gamaliel I, Paul's mentor.
Now the third matzah is to be placed on top again with the point facing the world. Take the middle matzah out and break it, as Jesus was broken for our sins.
Yachatz - Breaking the Middle Matzah
Take the middle matzah and break it into two, one piece larger than the other. The larger piece is set aside to serve as afikoman [A piece of matzo reserved to be eaten as the last food at a Passover Seder, sometimes initially hidden by the head of the household and searched for by the children present, who are then given a small reward for its return]. The smaller piece is put back, between the two matzot.
Pasted from <http://www.chabad.org/holidays/passover/pesach_cdo/aid/661624/jewish/English-Haggadah.htm>
Isaiah 27:13 (KJV)
And it shall come to pass in that day, [that] the great trumpet shall be blown, and they shall come which were ready to perish in the land of Assyria, and the outcasts in the land of Egypt, and shall worship the LORD in the holy mount at Jerusalem.
Today the Jews pay huge amounts of money to be buried in the Mt. of Olives so they will be with the Messiah comes. Barabbas was the scapegoat and Jesus was for the Lord!
No I've not read the book. I just thought it was interesting. Read the verse I posted of Isaiah... that's what he's talking about. I would think it's more like the resurrection than the rapture, but, back then they argued about whether the resurrection even existed, just like today about the rapture. The matzah today is square and round...Buncha things I didn't know in the video and a bunch I don't understand, so I guess I will have to rewatch later. I'm kinda fuzzy on how being interred at the Mount of Olives is the Jewish rapture? Have you read the book? Are matza's now round or still triangular? I thought that a "stranger" is included at the Passover meal...gentile. You would have to be circumsized for that postion at that meal? I find I want to find more information on Jewish feasts - anyone know a good book? Interesting that one of the feasts are no longer observed (I forgot which one? First fruits?)
My bible is not a latin bible so theres no word as rapture in it either.
My bible is KJV and talks about resurrection. Gathering together is what happens after the resurrection, when Jesus gathers everyone together , could also look at it as embracing. (Kjv was not a translation from latin, its from the original languages, hebrew and greek)
I guess thats what ppl talk about when they say rapture, but I really dont like the word, it reminds me of rape. So it just may be semantics, but there is NO rapture without any resurrection FIRST.
If people insist otherwise, only got to look in bible to see its not so. Maybe that word is in the latin bibles, but I dont speak latin, and I dont think anyone else here does either. Unless, perhaps, you go to a roman catholic church.
The rapture is not the resurrection, they are not one in the same. The resurrection is part of the rapture. There are some saints that will not die when the rapture happens....they will be changed into their incorruptible state. 1 Corinthians 15:51-53.If you understood original languages and the nature of God in His presentation of the catching away of the saints, that would keep you from thinking such absurd things, such as the wonderful rapture associated with rape in your mind. This distasteful association with the word is only your sensibilities keeping you from full comprehension of what lies in store for the Body of Christ.
Whether or not you like the word, that is what is about to happen to us. The resurrection IS the Rapture!
BTW, none of us speak Old English, either.
The rapture is not the resurrection, they are not one in the same. The resurrection is part of the rapture. There are some saints that will not die when the rapture happens....they will be changed into their incorruptible state. 1 Corinthians 15:51-53.
Just wanted to make things clear since there seems to be some confusion as to what exactly the rapture is. I didn't want someone to think that the resurrection is the rapture across the board, as in everyone that will ever be resurrected is raptured.Yes, but the resurrection is concerning those who have died, and it is all part of the rapture of the Church. Certainly, we understand that the living at that time are not resurrected, but caught up to the Lord in the heavens.