Well then; first of all, I believe that Jesus put the skids under all these visions and apparitions when He told the Pharisees : Matt 12:39. But he answered them, "An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah.
Mat 12:40 For just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
"This generation" properly refers to the generation of men living in the end times. That is from then till now and beyond, till Christ shall return.
We do seek signs.
We are an evil and adulterous generation.
The Crucifixion, death, burial and glorious resurrection are the sign we have been given by the Christ.....is than not sufficient for us?
In post #23 you made a vague reference to the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. Please consider what Jesus was teaching us more fully.
Luke 16:29. But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.'
Luke 16:30. And he said, 'No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.'
Luke 16:31. He said to him, 'If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.'"
So then, the rich guy asks for what? He asks for a dearly departed to return to the Earth to warn (in this case) his brothers.
And what does Abraham respond with? That is right! Unbelieving people will not be convinced even by the return of the dead.
Now if that was a lesson Jesus wanted to teach, we should believe it above any competitive idea don't you think?
Also, in that same post you mention the counsel of Jerusalem. Ave, the rules for circumcision were to induct male children into the covenant that the Lord made between Himself and Abraham. But as Christians were are heirs with Christ of a new covenant, one that involves circumcision of the spirit, not the flesh. The Apostles were not setting aside any scripture at all.
Again from your post #23, you say:"The New Testament covers a very brief period of time and a small amount of the History of the early Church and the Apostles is contained in the NT." This is true, however do not loose sight of the fact that "2Tim 3:16. All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,
2Tim 3:17. that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
Now if the Scriptures made the servants of the Lord complete and fully equipped, then it follows that the scriptures need no future embellishment.
Ahhh that post #23 again!
The Marriage feast at Cana was not the first miracle that Jesus should be credited with.
Consider fasting forty days and nights. Jesus resisted hunger, He resisted thirst. He resisted temptation. Now that was a miracle greater than turning a bit of water into wine. Remember that Jesus fasted forty days and nights before the devil's tempting even began.
Now, in post#29, you suggest that God thought Mary might succeed where the sign of Jonah failed.
Not good.
Also I can not remain silent on this most important issue.
Mary was the mother of the man Jesus. She was not the mother of God. That is absurd. Mother being the source of life for her offspring and the source of God's life, she most emphatically was not. Jesus' Father is God the Father, why? because he was begotten of the Father. Jesus as to his human nature was Mary's son. Please do not say that Mary is the mother of God.
God has no progenitor. That is as ridiculous as saying that Daffy Duck hatched out of an orange.