No I would say you are confusing "in His name" and "INTO His name" and have no idea what this means just what you have been wrongly convinced of (Perhaps you have been reading the heresies of David Bernard)...he does not tell you what he knows to be true (that which I have revealed unto you)...this is where you got the idea that the name Jesus is the name of the Father and the Spirit (same faulty source)...the Son exists from all eternity with the Father and the Spirit but Jesus was made a little lower than the angels...it is God's word and His sovereign plan, that He may be the Lamb of God (our perfect atonement without spot or blemish...the only appropriate sin offering)...in baptism we become identified with Him in His death, burial, and resurrection
Being baptized using the name of the Lord Jesus is not wrong, nor the only correct way, just as being baptized "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" is also not wrong, nor the only correct way...its about you being placed in God and God being placed in you...if you truly have faith...
I know many UPC and Holiness Apostolic people who love the Lord God deeply with great commitment and love their neighbor as themselves, accepting and walking in the sacrifice Christ made on their behalf...so I am not saying you are not saved (as some will now that this secret is revealed), I am saying you have been convinced of a set of incorrect understandings as assuredly contrived as the doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses...were you also taught how to speak in tongues and convinced by them if you did not do so you could not be saved (other lies)...
Run from them my friend as fast as you can...they teach "another Jesus"...run fast...this is the first of two admonitions, after that I will not speak of this again. As soon as I stop typing I am praying for the veil to be lifted. May the Lord have mercy on us all.
In His love
brother Paul
No I would say you are confusing "in His name" and "INTO His name" and have no idea what this means just what you have been wrongly convinced of (Perhaps you have been reading the heresies of David Bernard)...he does not tell you what he knows to be true (that which I have revealed unto you)...this is where you got the idea that the name Jesus is the name of the Father and the Spirit (same faulty source)...the Son exists from all eternity with the Father and the Spirit but Jesus was made a little lower than the angels...it is God's word and His sovereign plan, that He may be the Lamb of God (our perfect atonement without spot or blemish...the only appropriate sin offering)...in baptism we become identified with Him in His death, burial, and resurrection
Being baptized using the name of the Lord Jesus is not wrong, nor the only correct way, just as being baptized "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" is also not wrong, nor the only correct way...its about you being placed in God and God being placed in you...if you truly have faith...
I know many UPC and Holiness Apostolic people who love the Lord God deeply with great commitment and love their neighbor as themselves, accepting and walking in the sacrifice Christ made on their behalf...so I am not saying you are not saved (as some will now that this secret is revealed), I am saying you have been convinced of a set of incorrect understandings as assuredly contrived as the doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses...were you also taught how to speak in tongues and convinced by them if you did not do so you could not be saved (other lies)...
Run from them my friend as fast as you can...they teach "another Jesus"...run fast...this is the first of two admonitions, after that I will not speak of this again. As soon as I stop typing I am praying for the veil to be lifted. May the Lord have mercy on us all.
In His love
brother Paul
First of all the idea reckoning salvation as contingent upon a religious ritual, namely water baptism, is salvation by works and as such is contrary to the gospel. It is a Judaizing of the faith - or one may say a Catholicizing of the faith - having its origin among the cult of the circumcision of which Paul wrote about in Galatians and elsewhere.
And likewise concerning the Pentecostal position of making salvation contingent upon a particular baptismal formula - in particular upon saying that one is baptized in the name of Jesus only in contrast to that of Mt 28:19.
Such people of a salvation by works theology are themselves unsaved and need to repent and come to believe the gospel.
What is the saving Gospel ? Just believe? Shaking a preacher's hand? Signing a church membership? Accepting Christ?First of all the idea reckoning salvation as contingent upon a religious ritual, namely water baptism, is salvation by works and as such is contrary to the gospel. It is a Judaizing of the faith - or one may say a Catholicizing of the faith - having its origin among the cult of the circumcision of which Paul wrote about in Galatians and elsewhere.
And likewise concerning the Pentecostal position of making salvation contingent upon a particular baptismal formula - in particular upon saying that one is baptized in the name of Jesus only in contrast to that of Mt 28:19.
Such people of a salvation by works theology are themselves unsaved and need to repent and come to believe the gospel.
What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather, discovered in this matter? If, in fact, Abraham was justified by works, he had something to boast about— but not before God. What does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation. However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness. David says the same thing when he speaks of the blessedness of the man to whom God credits righteousness APART FROM WORKS. (faith alone justifies)
For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith— and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.
What was Paul so upset at in Galatians that led him to say, "I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned!"
It was because some men came down from Judea to Antioch and were teaching the brothers: "Unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved." Acts 15:1 So Paul went to the church in Jerusalem to discover a cult of false brethren in that church - which was the origin of Catholicism - the origin of sacramental theology. "This matter arose because some false brothers had infiltrated our ranks to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves. We did not give in to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might remain with you."
Paul rebuked Peter for compromising the gospel by his actions and said to him, "know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law, because by observing the law no one will be justified." Gal 2:16
He asked rhetorically, "I would like to learn just one thing from you: Did you receive the Spirit by observing the law, or by believing what you heard?" Gal 2:2 Just as in Romans 4 Paul viewed the gospel as an offer of salvation by faith alone apart from the observance of regulations and religious rituals.
Catholics, "Jesus only" Pentecostals and other such denominations who view salvation contingent upon one's works - the observance of regulations and religious rituals - are in the same category as the heretics Paul dealt with - false brethren who not only don't believe the gospel but who fabricate their own gospel, infiltrating the Christian community to propagate heresy.
Paul, you are the one who is labeling me......We are not just talking about words.....We're talking about the name of Jesus Christ, who I worship as my God- Not magic formulas.
Show me ONE explicit verse in scripture where they spoke of someone's baptism in the trinity formula. When you were baptized did your pastor not say something like: "As my brother in Christ, I now baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost ??
I gave you a list of explicit scriptures Paul, you haven't provided one
Here is a verse that shows you must be Baptized after you first beleive....Acts 8 verses 36-38..... Apostle Philip was witnessing to the Eunich...." If you beleive with all your heart..thou mayest...He said he beleived...then Philip took him down into the water and baptized him....next
Here is the one verse that kills any belief in Infant or Baby Baptism...Ready?
Mark 16 v 16 Jesus said:
" He that BELIEVES and is Baptized shall be saved........."
Question: Can an Infant or Newborn " Beleive"? Nada...No way. Baby Baptism is nothing more then a man made tradition. I was Catholic, I was baptized when I was 3 weeks old. It is a cute little tradition that makes a family all warm and fuzzy....but that baby one day will grow up and have to Repent and go through the written way it has to be done.
God is not like some Courtroom Judges here on Earth whereby a person can plea- bargain their way out of a harsh sentance. No amount of Crying, pleading or anything else can a person plead with The Lord will get anyone off. For further proof just read what transpires at the White Throne Judgement..Judgement day
Revelation: Revelation 20 v 11-15
Circumcision in the OT was the Forerunner of NT Repentance and Water Baptism...Your heart receives Circumcision now.
Revealed to me through His Spirit and cross checking verses..Rick01, I ask this with all sincerity and respect, where did you get this information?
Revealed to me through His Spirit and cross checking verses..
What I said is well known throughout Christianity. Do you believe all scripture is literal? I don' t ...Scripture is made up of Types and Shadows, Dual And Hidden meanings, Literal meanings.But if the Holy Spirit revealed something different to me through prayer, study, and extensive Biblical research...does this mean the Holy Spirit intends to lead to confusion or could it mean one of us is wrong? And if one of us is wrong, how do we figure out which one it is?