regarding Darwinism. I see in most books of natural history they have his erroneous worldview embedded in the useless 'facts' thrown around willy nilly where they state with no evidence whatsover that this or that species was billions of years old (and the billions of years varies from book to book) that I usually just chuck them as out of date when I see that in my non-fiction collection. Or books that imply when we lived in trees and started walking on two legs...um.. what is is a Rudyard Kipling fairy tale? LOL
If it s confusing to me it's confusing to children and adults. It only makes sense to the scientists who tries to convince themselves its true.
I posted for them quite a number of quotes from their own leading evolutionists admitting that the fossil record has failed to show any progression steps within evolutionary processes, and they retain their faith in evolution as fact to this very day. So, evolutionists mostly hold to evolution because the only alternative is God. Their hatred of God is tangible.
MM