Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with you Major. And we were taught that it was to be the first fruits without blemish that we were to sacrifice..also a harbinger for the coming Messiah. That is what got Cain into strife, he short changed the Lord.
So Dirty, are you saying that for those who sacrificed using the blood of an animal; let's say 1000 years before Christ, were not really forgiven until the Atoning Blood of Christ was "Back Dated" to cover their sin?I agree that the 'power is in the blood'-but whose blood? The blood of the animals-or the blood of humans? Is there a significant difference as humans received the 'spirit' not just the 'breath of life'?
My argument would be that no blood was sufficient until the 'blood of Christ' flowed. Everything else was a temporary symbol of things to come. God stressed the importance of the blood so when Christ died-there would be a forcible acknowledgement of the Jews that the blood of the Son of Man was the ultimate price-no animal sacrifice would be sufficient.
As a God that foresees all things-I am speculating that was His true intent on 'blood sacrifice' from the beginning. The 'blood sacrifice aspect of religion is no longer required (of the one true religion anyway) because the one True Sacrifice was completed at Calvary.
In my opinion....
So Dirty, are you saying that for those who sacrificed using the blood of an animal; let's say 1000 years before Christ, were not really forgiven until the Atoning Blood of Christ was "Back Dated" to cover their sin?
Totally agree, Dirty.
It was all to be done in faith in the blood of the coming Messiah.
C'mon guys.....I'm not devious, not even a deviant....I don't think so anywayThat was a simple question specifically addressed to Dirty, free of hidden agenda.
Not sure who you were replying to Dirty. Doesn't seem to address my question, but oh well.I didn't say that sacrifices were irrelevant did I? Not at all-God has a a purpose for everything. When God cleanses sin-He cleanses sin. If I were to make pre-Christ sacrifices "irrelevant"; well wouldn't that make the sacrifice of Christ irrelevant? GOD FORBID!
My point is this-God's purposes in anything is so far beyond us-even looking back through history we don't have the full picture and won't; no matter how much we debate prophesy and scripture. We will however get our all the answers we need in 'That Day'.
The 'blood sacrifices' were an absolute necessity in God's purpose-no doubt. But to say that the sacrifice itself had something to do with forgiveness of sin would be bordering on folly in my opinion. Did the Lord Himself not say He was tired and disgusted with sacrifices? Why? Because it wasn't about the sacrifice-it was about the "heart condition" of the individual and the nation of Israel when that sacrifice was offered.
Yes the original method of atoning of sin was to have a blood sacrifice in obedience to the will of the Lord. And yet with all things human-was fouled up by the uncommitted heart of the people to God. Is not the heart the TRUE center of God's glory?
Matthew 15:8, Mark 7:6
Mark 12:
28 And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:
33 And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
34 And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.
So Dirty, are you saying that for those who sacrificed using the blood of an animal; let's say 1000 years before Christ, were not really forgiven until the Atoning Blood of Christ was "Back Dated" to cover their sin?
Not sure who you were replying to Dirty. Doesn't seem to address my question, but oh well.
I didn't say that sacrifices were irrelevant did I? Not at all-God has a a purpose for everything. When God cleanses sin-He cleanses sin. If I were to make pre-Christ sacrifices "irrelevant"; well wouldn't that make the sacrifice of Christ irrelevant? GOD FORBID!
My point is this-God's purposes in anything is so far beyond us-even looking back through history we don't have the full picture and won't; no matter how much we debate prophesy and scripture. We will however get our all the answers we need in 'That Day'.
The 'blood sacrifices' were an absolute necessity in God's purpose-no doubt. But to say that the sacrifice itself had something to do with forgiveness of sin would be bordering on folly in my opinion. Did the Lord Himself not say He was tired and disgusted with sacrifices? Why? Because it wasn't about the sacrifice-it was about the "heart condition" of the individual and the nation of Israel when that sacrifice was offered.
Yes the original method of atoning of sin was to have a blood sacrifice in obedience to the will of the Lord. And yet with all things human-was fouled up by the uncommitted heart of the people to God. Is not the heart the TRUE center of God's glory?
Matthew 15:8, Mark 7:6
Mark 12:
28 And one of the scribes came, and having heard them reasoning together, and perceiving that he had answered them well, asked him, Which is the first commandment of all?
29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:
30 And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.
31 And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
32 And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:
33 And to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.
34 And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question.
My apologies Calvin-but to answer directly: No; I am not saying they were 'not really forgiven'. This was the point I was trying to make about 'relevant' above. Perhaps it was a bit confusing. Unlike humans-when God forgives-through whatever means He deems fit-He forgives permanently.
The point I was trying to make is 'blood sacrifices' paved the way of understanding for the ultimate True Sacrifice in Christ. Not that they were unimportant in their time-but in our time 'blood sacrifices' are no longer (eh-hem) 'relevant' as we have 1 sacrifice in Christ that covers all sins. The age of 'blood sacrifices' ended at Calvary. Does that make more sense?
Makes total sense to me. A perfect example of type and anti-type.
There's no magical power in animal blood to erase sins: that's a pagan concept.
The forgiveness was in the converted heart that obeyed by yielding what was most precious, whether animal or his best crops as a "losing example". They typified the Sacrifice of the best of the Father, the life of His Son for us.
Partly correct, Major. The sins of the OT were covered by the acts of the sanctuary service, the shedding of animal blood was symbolic, not effective of anything of itself, EXCEPT the sinners obedience. It was an earnest of what Christ would do for all sinners, die for their sins, take their sins upon Himself. Therefore OT sinners that actually when beyond the ceremony and repented and obtained a "new heart", just like sinners to day must, their sins were sent forward and canceled, just as ours must be seen in the light of the past, at what was done for us 2000 years ago.
Hee hee! Faith and works, again!![]()