MMurphy
Inactive
I totally agree with that.
This might be the closest thing I've ever seen to a miracle.
I totally agree with that.
This might be the closest thing I've ever seen to a miracle.
Its not personal I just tire of hearing people use circular arguments to defend their positions. We all read scripture in light of experiences and what we have learned and we do so in a fallible way. Your attitude from the get go has been that your interpretation is correct. Well fine but you can't prove that by just citing the scripture we're all looking at and interpreting differently. It comes across as though your promoting your own magestrium.
Where in scripture does it say that the Holy Spirit will give you His interpretation?
My brother, all I did and do is post the Scripture and then explain what I believe is being said for us all to learn from and grow on.
To me it is God's advice to man so that we can live a righteous life serving the God of Creation. YOU do not have to agree with me. In fact no one has to agree with me. I am NOT a Bible scholar or an infallible teacher. I am a sinner saved by the grace of God with nothing to prove except to get out the Word of God that Jesus and only Jesus saves man from their sin and its penalty.
Listen and read this slowly and carefully........, ready??..........
You are obviously trying to blame me for your inability to grasp the teaching and advice that is given to us in the Word of God.
I HAVE NEVER said and do so right now, that my interpretation is correct!!! That is your perception because what I have said is NOT in agreement with what YOU believe.
It seems that YOU are the one challenged to be correct which then manifests itself in accusing me of that which is your problem.
Need proof...........?????????
Instead of just saying........"I do not agree with what you just said", you have decided to say............
" Your attitude from the get go has been that your interpretation is correct/It comes across as though your promoting your own magestrium".
That is YOUR perception and opinion, not a statement of fact.
I am always available to discuss the Scriptures with anyone including you. But if it can not be done in a way where personal accusations are used, then it would be wise if we both moved on to better things as I am too old to argue over non-essential things.
Be good and do well!
Fair enough. I am sure that I have done that, and in that case I apologize. There are some here that are pretentious, but I should not have applied it to you. I think I was just heated yesterday, so I'm sorry.
Your subsequent post also helped, so thank you.
Thank you and I accept your kind words. You appear to be a person who loves the Lord and who is seeking the truth of life.
It just maybe that, that is the reason you have found yourself on this web site asking questions and posting comments. YA THINK??
Now allow me to say something to you in Christian love. The very best thing you can do as a Catholic and a Christian is to spend some quality time in Bible Study instead of Church doctrine and traditions. I was one that had to do the very same thing. I myself, many years ago, being brought up in the Pentecostal religion thought I was the only one who was correct and Pentecostalism was the only real religion and everyone else was wrong.
I KNEW what the pastors and teachers told me and they had to be right...didn't they????
BUT low and behold as I grew both in stature and knowledge I began to read the Bible and STUDY what I thought was the truth and I began to see that the teachings did not always agree with the Word of God. When that happens my brother we only have ONE choice and that is to believe the Word of God and NOT the dogmas of man.
Romans 10:17 clearly tells us that...........
"Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God".
Much to everyone's surprise I'm not actually catholic. I agree with you and bible study. What I have found in my church studies, however is that even the rejection of the catholic church is a man made dogma. For instance sola scriptura is a protestant dogma and I've found that most Christians did not abolish man made doctrines, they just substituted their own.
I do believe in respect to spiritual counsellors and I supposed my thinking is that doctrines of the old church ought to be held as true until proven otherwise with scripture. I don't think it was wise to throw away all traditions of the church because now people just ordain themselves. And its just become chaos.
Let's move this discussion back into the Afterlife.2 Timothy 3:16 (ESV)
"All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness".
The question must now be, is that statement in the Bible correct. or do we reject it or modify it to what we would like for it to say???
The historical fact is that for centuries the Roman Catholic Church had made its traditions superior in authority to the Bible.
That action resulted in many practices that were in fact contradictory to the Bible. Some examples are prayer to saints and/or Mary, the immaculate conception, transubstantiation, infant baptism, indulgences, and papal authority. Now these are NOT my opinions but are simple proven historical events and facts that can be easily confirmed if you so choose to do so.
These and more were done out of tradition and from incorporating from the people that the Roman Empire had conquered. To keep the peace after they had conquered a country they allowed the religious practices of that land to be used in worship and those practices found there way into the RCC dogma. PLEASE......do the work, look up these facts in history.
Then is was Martin Luther, the founder of the Lutheran Church and father of the Protestant Reformation, was publicly rebuking the Catholic Church for its unbiblical teachings. The Catholic Church threatened Martin Luther with excommunication (and death) if he did not recant.
Martin Luther's reply was, “Unless therefore I am convinced by the testimony of Scripture, or by the clearest reasoning, unless I am persuaded by means of the passages I have quoted, and unless they thus render my conscience bound by the Word of God, I cannot and will not retract, for it is unsafe for a Christian to speak against his conscience. Here I stand, I can do no other; may God help me! Amen!”
The primary Catholic argument against sola scriptura is that the Bible does not explicitly teach sola scriptura. Catholics argue that the Bible nowhere states that it is the only authoritative guide for faith and practice. While this is true, they fail to recognize a crucially important issue. We know that the Bible is the Word of God. The Bible declares itself to be God-breathed, inerrant, and authoritative. We also know that God does not change His mind or contradict Himself. So, while the Bible itself may not explicitly argue for sola scriptura, it most definitely does not allow for traditions that contradict its message. Sola scriptura is not as much of an argument against tradition as it is an argument against unbiblical, extra-biblical and/or anti-biblical doctrines. The only way to know for sure what God expects of us is to stay true to what we know He has revealed—the Bible. We can know, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that Scripture is true, authoritative, and reliable. The same cannot be said of tradition.
(Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/sola-scriptura.html#ixzz36mkFS6fG)
Let's move this discussion back into the Afterlife.
Major, I want to ask your opinion (and in all sincerity) what is your take on the afterlife?
And before you answer I want to introduce a few issues I have with the traditional view:
So, the basic premise of Christian faith, at least as it is now, holds that no amount of works can get you to heaven. It's one sin and your done, and in some senses even with just the original sin, unless you accept the sacrifice of Christ. So...
(A) What about the people who came, before Christ's atonement of sin? Particularly the Jews, but also the majority of the world. One can hardly say a gentile living in the Indus River Valley could have had the chance to become a Jew, so would they be condemned to Hell in your opinion?
(B) So, one common construction from revelations is the Bosom of Abraham, which from my understanding is a special pocket of Hades where the righteous dead await the resurrection. But in that case, what qualified someone to enter to Bosom? Was it only being a Jew or was it also following the Law?
(C) If there was a degree of discretion about who entered to Bosom of Abraham, could it also be argued that there is a discretion for those who, outside of the Christian Faith, nevertheless do good works, say Gandhi? Perhaps a purgatory, or posthumous baptism? Paul does say those who follow the law without the law are better off than those who have been given the law but do not follow it. James likewise echoes Faith without Good Works is dead. Could this mean that good works might also spark unknowing faith?
Thank you for effectively answering none of my question Euphemia.Any spirit in Hades now is one awaiting Judgment, not heaven. those who WERE in the bosom of Abraham were all there before Jesus' crucifixion and were released to heaven by their faith in the Messiah they had placed their hope in by Christ who came to release them during the three days before His resurrection. So, they were Christians before Christ, in effect. There is no more "Bosom of Abraham" now, as those who die as believers go immediately to be with Christ.
Thank you for effectively answering none of my question Euphemia.
A. Christ's atonement is throughout the ages: Gen 22:8, Ps 31:16, Ps 103:4Let's move this discussion back into the Afterlife.
Major, I want to ask your opinion (and in all sincerity) what is your take on the afterlife?
And before you answer I want to introduce a few issues I have with the traditional view:
So, the basic premise of Christian faith, at least as it is now, holds that no amount of works can get you to heaven. It's one sin and your done, and in some senses even with just the original sin, unless you accept the sacrifice of Christ. So...
(A) What about the people who came, before Christ's atonement of sin? Particularly the Jews, but also the majority of the world. One can hardly say a gentile living in the Indus River Valley could have had the chance to become a Jew, so would they be condemned to Hell in your opinion?
(B) So, one common construction from revelations is the Bosom of Abraham, which from my understanding is a special pocket of Hades where the righteous dead await the resurrection. But in that case, what qualified someone to enter to Bosom? Was it only being a Jew or was it also following the Law?
(C) If there was a degree of discretion about who entered to Bosom of Abraham, could it also be argued that there is a discretion for those who, outside of the Christian Faith, nevertheless do good works, say Gandhi? Perhaps a purgatory, or posthumous baptism? Paul does say those who follow the law without the law are better off than those who have been given the law but do not follow it. James likewise echoes Faith without Good Works is dead. Could this mean that good works might also spark unknowing faith?
What about the non-Jews prior to Christ?A. Christ's atonement is throughout the ages: Gen 22:8, Ps 31:16, Ps 103:4
B. Actually Abraham's bosom is only mentioned by Jesus in Luke 16 where He preached to the captives and lead them free. Luke 4:18, 1Pe 3:19
C. Only those that had faith in God. There are no specific verses, but is the theme throughout the scriptures. Hab 2:4, Rom 1:17, Gal 3:11, Heb 10:38.
I hope this helps. I'm off to work...
Let's move this discussion back into the Afterlife.
Major, I want to ask your opinion (and in all sincerity) what is your take on the afterlife?
And before you answer I want to introduce a few issues I have with the traditional view:
So, the basic premise of Christian faith, at least as it is now, holds that no amount of works can get you to heaven. It's one sin and your done, and in some senses even with just the original sin, unless you accept the sacrifice of Christ. So...
(A) What about the people who came, before Christ's atonement of sin? Particularly the Jews, but also the majority of the world. One can hardly say a gentile living in the Indus River Valley could have had the chance to become a Jew, so would they be condemned to Hell in your opinion?
(B) So, one common construction from revelations is the Bosom of Abraham, which from my understanding is a special pocket of Hades where the righteous dead await the resurrection. But in that case, what qualified someone to enter to Bosom? Was it only being a Jew or was it also following the Law?
(C) If there was a degree of discretion about who entered to Bosom of Abraham, could it also be argued that there is a discretion for those who, outside of the Christian Faith, nevertheless do good works, say Gandhi? Perhaps a purgatory, or posthumous baptism? Paul does say those who follow the law without the law are better off than those who have been given the law but do not follow it. James likewise echoes Faith without Good Works is dead. Could this mean that good works might also spark unknowing faith?
Let's move this discussion back into the Afterlife.
Major, I want to ask your opinion (and in all sincerity) what is your take on the afterlife?
And before you answer I want to introduce a few issues I have with the traditional view:
So, the basic premise of Christian faith, at least as it is now, holds that no amount of works can get you to heaven. It's one sin and your done, and in some senses even with just the original sin, unless you accept the sacrifice of Christ. So...
(A) What about the people who came, before Christ's atonement of sin? Particularly the Jews, but also the majority of the world. One can hardly say a gentile living in the Indus River Valley could have had the chance to become a Jew, so would they be condemned to Hell in your opinion?
(B) So, one common construction from revelations is the Bosom of Abraham, which from my understanding is a special pocket of Hades where the righteous dead await the resurrection. But in that case, what qualified someone to enter to Bosom? Was it only being a Jew or was it also following the Law?
(C) If there was a degree of discretion about who entered to Bosom of Abraham, could it also be argued that there is a discretion for those who, outside of the Christian Faith, nevertheless do good works, say Gandhi? Perhaps a purgatory, or posthumous baptism? Paul does say those who follow the law without the law are better off than those who have been given the law but do not follow it. James likewise echoes Faith without Good Works is dead. Could this mean that good works might also spark unknowing faith?
What about the non-Jews prior to Christ?
This might be the closest thing I've ever seen to a miracle.