PeaceLikeaRiver
Inactive
Really? Even Reformers believed it.At no time was Mary ever sinless! I think the RCC really messed up on this one.
Really? Even Reformers believed it.At no time was Mary ever sinless! I think the RCC really messed up on this one.
Friend, this isn't unique to the Catholic Church. Even the reformers believed this, and with great reason--this was recognized going back to the very early Church.
Since God has no beginning or end, therefore God has no mother! This is where the problem arises. The religious leaders of Jesus's day wanted to kill him because he said he was the Son of God making him equal with God. If Mary is the mother of God that would elevate her to being equal with Jesus, which is a lie. Mary was only used by God to bring forth Jesus's body and human nature not God which came by the Word through the Holy Spirit. Mary was someone chosen by God to bring about his purpose on earth. She was a sinner just like all of us, and needed salvation no different from any person born on planet earth.It's not that we disagree with Christ's divinity, but we disagree on the meaning of "mother of God." We also disagree that the Scriptures doesn't say to venerate Mary. We see that Mary recognized that generations would call her blessed, that Elizabeth venerated her by saying "blessed art thou among women, and blessed art the fruit of thy womb." As did Gabrielle when he said, "Hail Mary, full of Grace. The Lord is with thee."
Indeed, Jesus' divine nature does from the Father, not Mary. Though Mary being the mother of our Lord, and the Lord being our God, this means God chose His mother, and this being Mary. We agree that Jesus was man AND God and Mary was His mother, therefore Mary was the mother of God. This doesn't mean Mary gave birth to the Father, but she was chosen to be the mother of our Lord, who is Christ, and Christ is our God. Just as Thomas said, "My Lord, My God," Likewise, Mary is the mother of our Lord, Mary is the mother of our God."
Mary
Most Christians, including Protestants, recognize this. The reformers recognized this. Modern protestants recognize this.
I know you hold to Sola Scriptura Euphemia. I do not care to be challenged by you on why I, and many others, reject it. Once again, it doesn't make you right and me wrong.
I do not wish to rise to any scriptural challenges put forth by you. Please respect that.
I am not a reformer, I simply take the Word of God for what it says.Really? Even Reformers believed it.
I am not a reformer, I simply take the Word of God for what it says.
What do you base your opinion on but your own whim?At no time was Mary ever sinless! I think the RCC really messed up on this one.
No one says they're not different but I do not believe their differences constitute another faith.I understand. May I also say that you are between a rock and a hard place. You need to know that I do not reject or disinfranchaise the Catholic faith. I have many, many friends of that faith. But every one of them realize the difference we are talking about.
What do you base your opinion on but your own whim?
Worship of Mary as the "Mother of God" was instituted into the RCC in the year 431 AD at the Council of Ephesus. Prayers to Mary and dead saints was adopted by the RCC in the year 600 AD.
Since God has no beginning or end, therefore God has no mother!
This is where the problem arises. The religious leaders of Jesus's day wanted to kill him because he said he was the Son of God making him equal with God. If Mary is the mother of God that would elevate her to being equal with Jesus, which is a lie.
Mary was only used by God to bring forth Jesus's body and human nature not God which came by the Word through the Holy Spirit. Mary was someone chosen by God to bring about his purpose on earth. She was a sinner just like all of us, and needed salvation no different from any person born on planet earth.
Not at all. Worship of Mary was and always has been condemned by the Catholic Church. Didn't you see the discussion we had previously in this very thread? There are official statements made that express the difference between devotion and adoration, and adoration for Mary is stated as wrong.
Dead saints? Don't we have everlasting life in heaven?
Why not adore Paul the apostle, or John, or anybody? Why Mary? She was just a sinner like everyone else. To me it makes no Biblical sense to have statues of even try and it to get to God through Mary who has no part in these things. I really really encourage you to take leave of the RCC Church and run away as fast as you can. If not now, you will later as you learn more of the truth of the Gospel.Not at all. Worship of Mary was and always has been condemned by the Catholic Church. Didn't you see the discussion we had previously in this very thread? There are official statements made that expressurch the difference between devotion and adoration, and adoration for Mary is stated as wrong.
Dead saints? Don't we have everlasting life in heaven?
I've only seen the synods commending her as theotokos not worshiping her.Not at all. Worship of Mary was and always has been condemned by the Catholic Church. Didn't you see the discussion we had previously in this very thread? There are official statements made that express the difference between devotion and adoration, and adoration for Mary is stated as wrong.
Dead saints? Don't we have everlasting life in heaven?
It all boils down to worship. A to the dead saints aspect, if they are indeed saved people, their spirits are in heaven where they belong, but they have no omniscience or omnipresence or authority to hear the prayers of saints on earth who are instructed to pray in the name of Jesus Christ through Him, as sole mediator between God and man. Our prayers and petitions cannot take little side trips.
We're all on board that God doesn't have a literal mother that gave birth to God the father. This is not what the term "Mother of God" means. You must know this.
It doesn't elevate her to being equal with Jesus. It illustrates her obedience to God when she said yes to Him.
Rethink what you just said about the mother of our Lord. The idea that we was merely used to carry Christ and give birth to him downplays her as an incubator for Jesus. Would you ever call your own mother an incubator for you? Of course not. Would you ever call someone else's mother that? No, that would be disrespectful. So think twice before you call the mother of Christ that as well, because it's far worse to say that about the mother of our Lord.
I agree that because she was also human she needed a savior, but that's exactly what we believe -- through the salvation of God making it so, she was not tainted with original sin.
But once more...let's get back to the subject because now we're discussing something off topic.
Why not adore Paul the apostle, or John, or anybody? Why Mary?
She was just a sinner like everyone else. To me it makes no Biblical sense to have statues of even try and it to get to God through Mary who has no part in these things. I really really encourage you to take leave of the RCC Church and run away as fast as you can. If not now, you will later as you learn more of the truth of the Gospel.
Because as you already know.....What is our purpose to one another? Is it not to pray for one another and intercede in prayer? The Scriptures tell us it is. Why discredit those who are in the presence of Christ to not having the ability to pray for those who are still on earth but also part of the body of Christ?
Do you not see that every single person who is a believer is also by the same Holy Spirit impregnated with the Word of God and then gives birth to Christ in us? No different than Mary! We are all the mother of Jesus as Jesus said.....
Mar 3:33 And he answered them, "Who are my mother and my brothers?"
Mar 3:34 And looking about at those who sat around him, he said, "Here are my mother and my brothers!
Mar 3:35 For whoever does the will of God, he is my brother and sister and mother."