So you believe in literal pre-destination and not 'true' free will? The bible says many times that God is NO respecter of persons....Yes i do. But God knows when someones heart chooses to sin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you believe in literal pre-destination and not 'true' free will? The bible says many times that God is NO respecter of persons....Yes i do. But God knows when someones heart chooses to sin.
I would say that children will be no more leaders then Adam was. So it makes sense for the years that the devil is not released from the bottomless pit. But when he is, lion eats fattened calf and Adam either accepts or rejects the devil.
So you believe in literal pre-destination and not 'true' free will? The bible says many times that God is NO respecter of persons....
Scriptures please![]()
Lead who? a lion...exactly like Adam....not exactly reigning with Christ and judging angels...Check out this verse which could point to the millenial kingdom period.
Isa 11:6
The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them.
Children are designated as leaders in the kingdom of God
that makes no sense, care to clarify.I'm a Calvinist, so I can say with certainty that God is not a respecter of persons by electing and predestining some to salvation. The reason? all human beings are dead in their sins and equally tainted by their sinful nature. God's electing had nothing to do with the people themselves, but only God's grace.
that makes no sense, care to clarify.
I dont understand your post so scriptures would help in that regard. ThanksThis scripture you quoted is not saying that children will reign with Jesus.
Lead who? a lion...exactly like Adam....not exactly reigning with Christ and judging angels...
Are you asking for scripture saying that God is no respecter of persons? or that He treats us humans equally? Because by implying that babies receive the right to reign with Christ for eternity merely by dying early would mean that God IS a respecter of persons.....those in hell would then have a valid reason to curse God and we would all then be justified in killing our babies before they reach the age of accountability....
You have missed my question. You said ''that God is not a respecter'' and then ''God's electing had nothing to do with the people themselves, but only God's grace''. The two contradict each other. You are saying that we have NO free will. God is NO respecter of persons and a fair and just God. You are implying that some babies will go to hell and some to heaven?If that makes no sense, then it also does not make sense to you that Lazarus had nothing to do with being raised from the dead. Lazarus didn't "choose" to be raised from the dead, Jesus did everything. In the same way, we are dead in our sins prior to Christ's regeneration of our stony hearts, filled with our free willed hatred toward God.
1) I would say that children will be no more leaders then Adam was. 2) So it makes sense for the years that the devil is not released from the bottomless pit. 3) But when he is, lion eats fattened calf and 4) Adam either accepts or rejects the devil.Scriptures please
Certainly not to guarantee them eternity in heaven!! Babies fall under the umbrella of the parents in God's dealings with them just as the animals do.
If babies are guaranteed eternity in heaven are you saying they don't have free will to reject God?
In your opinion, where do babies then go when they die?
We are all born with sinful natures regardless of our parents beliefs and practises - so where do babies go?
What about aborted babies??? The bible tells us there is only one of two places - Hades or Heaven. So where do they go?
I am sorry KingJ about all the dodging, ill try and answer you now to the best of my limited knowledge. It is true that God did order the death of babies. But since we know God is good his reasons for doing it had to be good in its meaning. There are not to many ways to see why God comanded his people to do what they did. You ask is it right for us to kill babies, but even though it was Gods choosen people who killed babies it was God who comanded it. If God really said that and i do trust the bible to be Gods word then what God did was right. In those days God command such things because some nations were a pox and had to be removed. However there is a new order under Jesus and God does not need to do what he done thousands of years ago. I hope this was more helpful. Godbless
You have missed my question. You said ''that God is not a respecter'' and then ''God's electing had nothing to do with the people themselves, but only God's grace''. The two contradict each other. You are saying that we have NO free will. God is NO respecter of persons and a fair and just God. You are implying that some babies will go to hell and some to heaven?
Babies cant be in hell, because hell does not exist yet
and they are not in heaven because only God and the angels are allowed in heaven.