Glad you brought up the James passage so I can point out the James was wrong in making justification contingent upon works, directly contrary to what Paul said in ; as I noted previously.
The apostle Paul says, "if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness." () Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works"
Note that Paul uses to prove his point that justification if by faith ALONE apart from works. For the promise was given in and, having believed it, Abraham was immeditely justified in .
Now as that contradicts James, James had to come up with a different interpretation of . So in , James indicates that was not fulfilled when Paul said, but rather was a prediction not fulfilled until when Abraham worked - by offering Isaac. So for James, Abraham's faith was dead from till . And according the , consequently Abraham was unsaved during that time period.
James was not an apostle. He has no business being in the Bible. And though he was a brother of Jesus Christ, Nepostism doesn't trump apostleship.
Paul writes of his meeting with James. He says, "But from those who seemed to be something——whatever they were, it makes no difference to me; God shows personal favoritism to no man——for those who seemed to be something added nothing to me."
Doesn't make any difference to me either.