Well right now, I can only describe him as an historical figure (as you eloquently describe). I'm not being evasive, I simply don't have a link between Jesus and a god because I don't believe in the latter. You must see that I can't put any other attributes to Jesus because of that?
OK.....now that we have established that fact, you must put away the idea of intellectualism. You are falling back on an intellectual answer so as to not face the question at hand.. "I do not have a link between Jesus and a god because I do not believe in the latter".
I am not asking you if you believe in God.
I have talked to literally thousands of people who come across exactly as you are doing. That is not bad nor good, just a way or reaction to the question. You seem to be an intelligent person but intellectualism is not required because intellect is not the problem Tubby. To find a cure, we must 1st find the sickness. Do you concur????
The sickness is SIN. That is YOUR problem. We are SIN SICK! By the way, it is the same problem as every single person on the earth has...SIN!!! We are are infected and we all need to be healed.
Jesus IS A HISTORICAL figure, that is the fact and you just agreed with that. . ...
Now, there is not an intellectual answer that you can give and one is not needed.
Even the most un-intelligent person, when given the facts of a situation, can then give their educated opinion. That is what I am now asking you.
WHOM DO YOU SAY THAT JESUS IS?
He could have been a liar.
He could have been a lunatic.
He could have been a religious nut case.
He could have been the Son of God.
Now, according to the information available to YOU, who do you say that Jesus is?
I am asking you who YOU think Jesus is, based on the available information