Christian Comando, You said:
Secondly- Notice in
Gen. 6 in noah's day, they were called- "son's of God. in 2:6, 6:1, and 38:7, these were all "son's of God- (male), except the "stars of Heaven, a diverse group of Angels- (Female).
Nephilim Demon Hoax
Greetings. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all and keep you ever steadfast in the faith.
In reviewing the information concerning the Nephilim hybrid teaching the mystery of how this doctrine came to be and why it is that such is being so widely promoted became somewhat apparent and so I will present a brief overview of the situation.
As men began to populate the earth after the flood, and lose touch with the truth as preached by Noah, mankind descended again into darkness and so became hostile toward the Lord and His ways. Alternate explanations concerning the flood began to arise as demons sought to obscure that history and direct man into worshipping them as gods. In order to make that possible man would have to be deceived into believing a number of falsehoods, namely; that they (the demons) were originally responsible for teaching man science and that they were able to produce supermen that ought be considered mankind's true leaders. At the same time those truths that could hardly be erased from memory; the flood itself, and Noah, and the reason for the destruction of man, would have to be morphed to fit into a different framework so that the fallen angels, or some of them anyway, could be alluded to as being the liberators and protectors of man; which would amount to picturing the Lord as being somehow aloof and unconcerned as regards man's welfare. From there it would be rather simple to portray the Lord as having had the wrong motives in destroying most of mankind by way of a flood. (IE. That man could become transformed by knowledge into a god and so challenge the Lord's sovereignty.)
If the leaders of the wickedness prior to the flood could somehow be made out to look like heroes, perhaps even gods, then their evil ways could be passed off as being the proper way to go. From there it would be a piece of cake to brew up a religion with the devils themselves being installed as gods in the heavens, with men claiming descent from those gods, with certain elite men as chosen by those gods becoming priestly mediators. Under this scheme of things demon possessed men would become 'shaman' lords who then in turn would direct the people to worship those false demon gods in sky. By further enticing man with the old lie that Satan used to deceive Eve, namely; "Ye shall be as gods." a form of false salvation could be incorporated into the religion as well. The sun, the moon, the stars, and even the earth itself could be used as illustrative representations of their false gods and so the inner worship would also have an outward form that could be used to teach the people.
In order for this scheme to work Adam, Enoch, and Noah, etc., would have to be installed also as gods so that the truth that was commonly known could somehow be twisted and blended into the false religion itself. Adam as fallen could be presented as being the ideal prototype man, Enoch could become an example of a man that became a god (or angel), while Noah would become the man-god from the sea that taught men the secrets of the old world. And so the early Babylonian religion came into being with devils being worshipped as gods, a royal class set up that claimed descent from those gods, and a priesthood of shamans who served to instruct the people as regards religion and science while serving as spokesmen for the gods themselves. Of course they had a major problem: There were still real men of God who knew the truth, and then there were those pesky prophets that the Lord kept sending to warn man to put away that wickedness and return to serve the Lord rather than continuing on to their destruction while following after those false gods.
Man however being dead in sin would slide back into the darkness again and again as the demon spirits fought desperately to maintain control over civilization, and so alas the predominating world view would therefore be based upon the concept that there were many gods in the heavens that were upholding a royal class of rulers upon the earth, with the shaman priests acting as mediators for the people before those gods, while at the same time acting as scholars in regard to both science and religion.
In Daniel's time we see where the Lord humiliated those so called priests and scholars of Babylon who still persisted in following their wicked ways regardless. Those men among the Jews who were not faithful to the Lord, and hoping to gain favour with the establishment would have been busy creating a syncretistic religion that would combine the pseudo-science of that day with the biblical record so that such could be aligned with the common world view held by the Babylonians. By introducing the concept of fallen angels having produced children, which thereby had become the heroes of old, those men who in many cases may have been considered priests and scribes among the Israelite people, would be able to play a balancing act whereby they could be seen as faithful scholars who had a profound understanding of scripture while at the same time appear to be supportive of the angel-man doctrine of the Babylonians, which doctrine played a critical and prominent role in upholding their pagan religion.
Furthermore those men who had departed from the Lord altogether, having become shamans after the fashion of the Babylonian priesthood, though continuing to outwardly present themselves as being men of God, while serving up various forms of mysticism (IE. Kabalism) as if such were derived from the scriptures could seduce the people in under their enchantments, while offering them superstitious replacements for the truth. Talismans to protect the people from evil spirits, ($$$) acting as special chosen agents of God able to get the dead released from Gehenna, ($$$) (Yes that's where the Catholic Church got the idea whereby their priests pretended that they were able to lesson the time that Catholics spent in purgatory.) and pretending to communicate with the dead (necromancy) while making such appear to be part of their elite priestly duties. Sometimes these men were so overcome by the evil spirits that they tried to control (wizardry) that they even imagined themselves to be the promised Messiah and then even more demonic trickery was used as they set about to attract large followings.
Mystical writings as well would have been brought in that would have been used to back those spurious interpretations of the Holy scriptures which had been brewed up in order to support the Babylonian paradigm. The problem there is that the true priests of the Lord would have rejected those works as being spurious and I suspect that many false prophets were put to death for having tried to bring in as scripture those false writings that they had actually concocted through psychic channelling while they were under the influence of devils. Those bogus communiques therefore would have had much difficulty surviving, except of course among those cult groups that had broken away from mainline Judaism, (EG. The Gnostic Essenes.) and so it is to be expected that those writings would only be introduced, or reintroduced, among the Israelite community at large, secretly for the most part; while only becoming popular among the people during times of apostasy
Some have claimed that the “sons of God” and/or the
Nephilim of
Genesis 6:4 were aliens.
The Bible, the revealed written Word of God teaches that life is only possible through a process of creation. Even if there were other galaxies with planets very similar to earth, life could only be there if the Creator had fashioned it. If God had done that, and if these beings were going to visit us one day, then He would surely not have left us unenlightened about this.
God has given us rather specific details of the future—for example, the return of Jesus, and some details about the end of the world. The universe will, at some future point, be rolled up like a scroll (
Isaiah 34:4,
Revelation 6:14). If God had created living beings elsewhere, this would automatically destroy their dwelling place as well. Adam's sin caused all of creation to be affected by the Curse, so why would a race of beings, not of Adam's (sinful) seed, have their part of creation affected by the Curse, and then be part of the restoration brought about by Christ, the last Adam? All of this would seem exceedingly strange.
[1]
Some have claimed that the nephilim, or the “
sons of God,” both mentioned in
Genesis 6:2-4, were aliens. This is a wild extension of a common view that the “sons of God” who married the “daughters of men” were fallen
angels, and that the nephilim were products of those “marriages.”
“Sons of God” is clearly used of angels in
Job 38:7. The Septuagint (LXX) here translates “sons of God” as “angels of God.” This need not mean that evil angels, or demons, actually cohabited with women—Jesus made it clear that angels do not engage in sexual activities, at least not angels in heaven (
Matthew 22:30). Nevertheless, evil angels on earth could have used the bodies of ungodly men, by demonic possession, to achieve their evil purpose of producing an evil generation of people (
Genesis 6:12).
[2]
There are other reasonable suggestions as to the identity of the “sons of God” and the
Nephilim. Interestingly, the word nephilim is only used here and in
Numbers 13:33, where it clearly refers to the descendants of
Anak, who were big people, but still people. Furthermore, “sons of God” is not used exclusively of angels—the children of Israel are called “the sons of the living God” in
Hosea 1:10 (see also Psalm
73:15;
80:17).
Bible scholars such as H.C. Leupold believe that the “sons of God” were descendants of
Seth, the
godly line who are detailed in the preceding chapter (
Genesis 4:25-5:32). Leupold wrote, “But who were these ‘sons of God’? Without a shadow of a doubt, the Sethites.”
[3] In this view, the descendants of Seth became wayward and married the “daughters of men” indiscriminately, basing their choice only on appearance, without concern for godliness, and the nephilim were their offspring.
I like knowing the truth - I personally do not like being confused.
) are right or wrong on it? We can all learn something, right? But, learning to me does not equal lashing back at others. Even if someone disagrees with your comment(s), you should still treat them fairly and respectfully instead of going for the daggers, right? 
