I appreciate my pastor. This is why I take the time to write this. I also appreciate the posts of the poster urging a valid concern and caution. I don't want to dismiss all views. The reason I am so persistent in this issue is because I believe in freedom of study of the Word of God.
I, like you, think your pastor's heart is probably in the right place. He doesn't want destructive teaching to spread, and that is a valid concern. However, limiting Biblical discussion to a weekly assembly, if we simply observe assemblies around us, doesn't really seem to have any effect on stopping destructive teaching. I wonder if your pastor has considered that he may actually be doing more harm than good, as good as his intentions may be.
Here's how my church is currently modeled:
1. The most important aspect of church is the work we do in our local neighborhoods. Being ambassadors for Christ 24/7 is
being the church. Ideally, we shouldn't have people "in ministry" who do this on our behalf -- we are each to be the hands and feet of Christ in the place where He's put us. This work is what we should think of when we think of "church."
2. We meet in small groups once a week for prayer/study/reflection/encouragement/support/confession/discipleship, and each group will look different according to the specific needs of that group. These groups are safe places to be honest and ask the tough questions. These groups are also where you would take people you meet who are interested in Christ, or asking questions. These groups each do need mature Christians for complicated situations that may arise, but they don't need the pastor right there, and they many of them won't even really need an official leader, as responsibilities can be shared easily.
3. The last and least important (but not irrelevant) part of the organisation is the weekly full assembly. This is intended for believers only. People who aren't yet Christians are welcome, but it's encouraged for them to attend a small group so they can ask the questions they need to ask in a less intimidating environment, and develop closer relationships. The purpose of this assembly is simply to celebrate being the church together. There is a sermon, but it's understood that the most significant learning happens in the small groups. This assembly is one of the ways to support accountability throughout the groups -- we can talk to other groups about what they've been doing and discussing throughout the week. We don't think of this meeting as "church" -- we think of it as the church assembling.
When the pastor announced a few years ago that we would be shifting our thinking this way, a lot of people left the church, because they didn't want to be held accountable for doing anything. They just wanted to come to a church building once a week, give some money to a ministry, believe whatever a pastor told them to believe, and feel like all their obligations were met.
I do not suggest that this is the perfect model that will work with every church. I simply observe that this shift in thinking was what was necessary in
my church for people to understand what it means to be a disciple of Christ.