Were you looking in through the window????
(Looking down at my feet and sheepishly shuffling them about in the dirt) I might have. Why?
MM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were you looking in through the window????
(Looking down at my feet and sheepishly shuffling them about in the dirt) I might have. Why?
MM
I usually leave it alone with people who don't know what ad hominem is.
MM
Neither can propositions built on denials have any inherent substance to live off of.Theism and non-theism cannot possibly both be true at the same time because that would violate the law of non-contradiction.
Neither can propositions built on denials have any inherent substance to live off of.
For those who are still wondering what a two bit system would look like for combinations, it is this:
00, 01, 10, and 11.
In a system that has only zeros and ones for representations of each binary digit, that's all there is. In other words, BInary means two, either a zero or a one. Given the limited number of possible combinations of just those two digits, there are only four possibilities in a two bit resolution system. This is how computers think, although modern computers, the new ones, operate in a 64 bit environment, which has about 18.447 X 10^18 possible combinations. This is what is meant by "exponential growth" by adding bits of resolution.
I hope that's more clear than mud. In other words, it would take a five bit system to capture all the letters in our alphabet given that with five bits, there are 32 possible combinations of zeros and ones in a 26 letter alphabet.
00000, 00001, 00010, 00011, 00100,...
Hi, BobHello MM;
I'm going to dig deep with your post only because I don't understand binary, and I'm trying to see how this relates to your opening post in
Speak Your Mind 2.
Back in the late 80's I took a class and we touched on binary. I don't know if it was related to accounting and wasn't really interested, to me.
I was more focused on the problem of grasping debits and credits.
Are you saying binary leads to this exponential growth which increases over time, thus binary? What part does this play in our Christian walk?
I'm still trying to grasp how one has to do with the other.
God bless you and thank you, brother.
Hi, Bob
My apologies. I didn't mean to throw anyone with my comparison that I leveled out as a response to the atheists. I just wanted to explain in a little more detail to those who don't understand how computers think internally. Everything is zeros and ones. Each bit, as you may recall, is either a one or a zero. Two of them used in tandem can provide for four possible combinations of zeros and ones.
The way you calculate how many possibilities there are to the number of bits observed, such as 00000 (five bits), you can calculate how many possible combinations of zeros and ones there are in five bits by working out the formula 2^n (two to the power of however many bits there are)...so to find how many combinations of zeros and ones five bits will give you, between 00000 and 11111, you find that number by calculating 2^5 (2 to the fifth power). The two always remains in the equation because this is a binary system. So, 2^5=32 (two to the fifth power = 32 = 2x2x2x2x2=32). Each combination of bits can be assigned to one of the 26 letters in our alphabet, with six left over.
So, my message to the atheists was that explaining to them in mere language how one knows he has a real relationship with a real Creator is like them trying to retype the English dictionary with only four letters (defined by only two bit resolution) from our alphabet, when they actually need all 26 (five bits at bare minimum). I'm too much a nerd when it comes to electronics. I used to alter (hack) programs at the machine code level of programming.
Now as to the OP, the title is the key...speak your mind. This thread was created to allow people to talk about whatever was on their minds (Speak Your Mind) about doctrinal issues. That dentist was decidedly an atheist, and Tony drove home how irrational he was.
Atheism hits dead center on doctrine as the Bible addresses it head-on:
Psalm 14:1 [[To the chief Musician, [A Psalm] of David.]] The fool hath said in his heart, [There is] no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, [there is] none that doeth good.
Every soul is a precious one as a creation of God, for it is also written:
Ezekiel 33:11 Say unto them, [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
What those atheists don't understand is that the relationship that verifies to the believer the reality of the living and glorious Creator can only be experiential. I told them that a number of times, and they continue to hammer at it since they have no other weaponry in their arsenal. They claim to have been Christians at one time long ago, and have since walked away. I explained that they were never true followers of Christ, for it would make no sense to have ever walked away from a God whom they truly experienced, and then claim He doesn't exist. That didn't settle well with them, and they continue to claim they were Christians, to which I pointed that they then are making themselves out to be liars.
The two-edged sword slices both ways to ensure it landed the fatal blows, and these people weren't prepared for the truth leveled at them in love.
MM
In my reading this morning, this confirmed once again that we are no longer beholden to try and obey the Law of Moses:
Romans 10:1-4
1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. 2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. 3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ [is] the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.
That is so key to our understanding of the Law of Moses in relation to us who are in Christ Jesus. This isn't saying the Law has passed away, for it hasn't. The Law is what will condemn the unrighteous for their sins, and it is their sins that will condemn them to the pits of Hell.
This also strikes at the question some have asked, "How can a loving God cast anyone into Hell?"
That question has no meaning to the reality, for it is one's own sin that casts them into that place.
It's a good thing to obey the Law, but one will never be counted righteous for that. It's also certain that breaking many of the items in the Law of Moses is indeed sin. Yes. In Christ, we have His Law written upon our hearts, and therefore are no longer in need of a system of ordinances to govern our righteousness. With the righteousness of Christ imputed unto us who are in Him, the ordinances can't possibly do anything for us with what He who lived and fulfilled them perfectly has imputed to and upon us. Oh, what blessings He has given to us, and I want to bless Him with thanksgiving, worship and praise for it all. He is so worthy of our all.
MM
Amen to that, brother. I recall one of the men Jesus healed who came back to Him to give thanks and the Lord told him to go and offer up the blood and burnt offerings according to the Law, and people have told me that we must do ALL that Jesus commanded those back then, under that covenant, before the cross.
(crickets)
I love the Law of Moses, for it's perfect...a perfection we can't live, even contrary to the things my Messianic Jewish friends have tried to tell me in that we earn reward in Heaven for obedience to it as best we can.
That always struck me as contradictory. Given that we can't keep it unto righteousness, how then can we hope to reap rewards in Heaven apart from a total obedience? The self-made authorities who invent man-made doctrines and convey them as truth just strokes the cat's fur the wrong way, like grabbing a tiger by the tail after having forgotten the teeth on the other end.
MM
Yes. The Law is good. I also Love the Law and it is not that it is bad, it is that we can not keep it.
Absolutely agree, Major.
This is what creates the difficulty for those who think that imperfect KEEPING of the Law can somehow magically transform into rewards in Heaven for at least attempting to keep it...or at least some elements of it. These man-made features give me a great deal of pause. The bent so many have upon creating doctrines out of thin air like this is worse than fingernails on a chalkboard.
So, what I've done in response to their claims is to repeat, "We can't keep the Law as did Jesus," to which they repeat, "We can reap reward for trying..."
(sigh) Being adamant like that only leads to circular reasoning on their part, which serves as a tool to try and derail anyone undermining their pet doctrines with the truth. Their arguments in support of reward for trying to keep the Law is purely from silence so far as I can tell.
MM
Hello brothers;
It's nice to read some Godly discussion with substance.
I agree with Major. We just cannot keep it and that's a humble confession in itself. When I hear we are a church without sinners, the gatherings are pleasant, the praise band plays the latest and greatest, the preacher says what I like to hear. This reminds me of Matthew 6:1, 1 “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.
The church is not a fellowship of sinless people
Musicmaster, I agree with you. By merely saying, I'm attempting to keep the law or Christ's love commandments, then God will reward me. Baloney. I have to confess there is still that element of an ulterior motive.
Each day I have to ask God to search my heart. I'm still not there yet and may never be in this lifetime.
When we spread our own doctrine (on our terms with God) this becomes dangerous, especially to the new believer. On a personal note, I support the firm Shepherd, though their tone may have some weight on it is because they take God serious and what He says, not on what we think.
God bless and thank you, brothers, for sharing.
Agreed. We do not keep the law because we can not keep the law!!!!!
10-4, you're coming in loud and clear good buddy.Yes. The Law is good. I also Love the Law and it is not that it is bad, it is that we can not keep it.
10-4, you're coming in loud and clear good buddy.