As far as contradicting literal reading, that is too involved for here. There are many objections given by Young Earth creationists. Many involve a very narrow understanding of what is literal, and involve applying that literalness way beyond the intent of scripture while ignoring the clues God has put in nature itself.
Yes God created Adam and Eve.
By the way...
I used the term Theistic Evolution because I believe that Evolution in general fits the available evidence best (and there are plausible interpretations of scripture that are compatible).
I could also note that I believe in agriculture and can talk about farms and farming and how they provide food for my table and still recognize that it is ultimately God that provided for me. Maybe I should say I believe in theistic agriculture!
There is also
theistic mathematics,
theistic chemistry,
theistic astronomy,
etc.
We are to examine the 'natural' world to find out about God:
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened
Romans 1:18-21 (NASB)
We need to approach nature as a student of God, which means both that we understand it is about God, AND that its purpose is to correct misunderstandings we may hold.
Although meant for other concepts, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 is a fair approximation of proper scientific study.