What bible translation do you read and why?

"good evidence" supporting...

This will be someone's opinion, (scholarship) who hates some true doctrine and wants to get it out of the bible, and put in some other one, that is based on cultish teaching.

There are many "scholars" who have worked on new versions, and they do not accept the "deity" of Christ, so, the way they deny it, is to create a new version that omits or waters down verses that teach the Deity of Christ.
ALL of those who were on the Nkjv/esv/Nas teams accept Deity of Christ and full Inspiration of Bible!
 
Is Jesus God?
The KJV says so, sure, and not just the KJV.
Jesus Himself stated that He is God.
Thomas knelt before Christ and said....>"my Lord and my GOD", and God didnt correct him.

What do you believe?
Believe that Jesus is God, and that MV state that He is also!
 
I have prayed to God over what Bible to choose and He has lead me to the NIV on two occasions. I have the NRSV as it is the chosen Bible of the Episcopal church, which is the church that I have been a member of since finding it during my search for churches after leaving the Catholic church.

It was really simple, but are you willing to accept what I have said?
He is stuck in the cult of the KJVO!
 
Hello brothers and sisters;

The discussion is good but lets be careful when attempting to point out flaws with Bible translations, which is basically an opinion. In that case, let our opinions be respectful of those who find their personal devotion of their translation effective in their study growth of God's Word.

The NIV 2011 is an excellent, evangelical, trustworthy conservative Bible version. Over 100 trusted evangelical scholars revised the NIV 1984 using the same care and checks and balances that the previous edition's scholars utilized.

The publishers, scholars, theologians put years of editing and vetting before a Bible will be published, in other words, released as acceptable translations for the benefit of personal Christian growth.

We should be bringing people to Jesus instead of attacking God's Word without a discussion directly with the publisher, scholar or theologians who have served as translators of a Bible we don't consider acceptable.

I have heard and seen the witness of Christians who may not be avid readers in their academic discipline, or their acceptable translation, be it the KJV, NIV, ESV or the Message, but these brothers and sisters have made an impact in the community of introducing Christ to those who don't know Him.

God bless you all and your families.
ONLY people ever had real issues with concerning bible versions have been KJVO!
 
ONLY people ever had real issues with concerning bible versions have been KJVO!

Hello YeshuaFan;

Yes, I have also dealt with KJVO's, formal as well as functional equivalences and free readers, when opinions intensify, it feels like someone is telling my friend "who the strongest Christian reader that I know of," is a tool of Satan.

More than likely the source with their anti-gender accurate language, this is devious work of insinuating into the minds of good people trying to learn with doubts on subjects such as this. It's tough enough learning God's Word besides applying the application of witnessing to those who don't know who Christ is.
 
Hello brothers and sisters;


The NIV 2011 is an excellent, evangelical, trustworthy conservative Bible version.

That is your opinion, and thank you for sharing it.

I personally think this version is one of the worse ever created, X2.

Here is another opinion..

"""Respected Bible scholars have explained why inclusive translations such as the New International Version (NIV), New Revised Standard (NRSV), and Common English Bible (CEB) are deeply flawed. If you haven't yet considered their arguments, you might want to check out these Gender Neutral Bible Articles. """"""

So, i guess it "scholar vs scholar", in the case of the NIV.

As for me,
I just look at verses where "God" is taken out of the verse", or "Jesus" has become "the one", and i recognize that there are so many doctrinal issues with the NIV.

Isn't it a good thing that we don't have to bow down to the word "scholarship", and instead we can literally find out the truth for ourselves?
 
That is your opinion, and thank you for sharing it. I personally think this version is one of the worse ever created, X2. Here is another opinion.."""Respected Bible scholars have explained why inclusive translations such as the New International Version (NIV), New Revised Standard (NRSV), and Common English Bible (CEB) are deeply flawed. If you haven't yet considered their arguments, you might want to check out these Gender Neutral Bible Articles. """""" So, i guess it "scholar vs scholar", in the case of the NIV. As for me, I just look at verses where "God" is taken out of the verse", or "Jesus" has become "the one", and i recognize that there are so many doctrinal issues with the NIV. Isn't it a good thing that we don't have to bow down to the word "scholarship", and instead we can literally find out the truth for ourselves?

Hello Behold;
Yes, and with the help of the publishers. I suggest you stick with the Bible God has led you to learn and grow, daily. I also suggest you allow others who may be reading a translation you don't agree with to respect their decision and pray for them. I personally had seasoned disciples encourage me to stay away from the Amplified. Like yourself, they had their reasons but they prayed for my study and well being and this was over 30 years ago. Today I'm enjoying the ESV and use other translations as a cross reference which has been very beneficial in the ministry.
God bless you, Behold, and your whole family.

I have prayed to God over what Bible to choose and He has lead me to the NIV on two occasions. I have the NRSV as it is the chosen Bible of the Episcopal church, which is the church that I have been a member of since finding it during my search for churches after leaving the Catholic church. It was really simple, but are you willing to accept what I have said?

Hello naomanos;

I encourage you to receive the opinion of others, but you made the right choice to seek what God says about the translation you are studying. On a good note, churches worldwide are using the NIV as their chosen pew Bible as well as the KJV, NJB, RSV, etc...
What truly matters is your growing in the Word so when you apply the Gospel you are equipped and prepared to give an answer regarding the Christ.

God bless you, naomanos, and your wonderful children.
 
Hello Behold;
Yes, and with the help of the publishers. I suggest you stick with the Bible God has led you to learn and grow, daily. I also suggest you allow others who may be reading a translation you don't agree with to respect their decision and pray for them. I personally had seasoned disciples encourage me to stay away from the Amplified. Like yourself, they had their reasons but they prayed for my study and well being and this was over 30 years ago. Today I'm enjoying the ESV and use other translations as a cross reference which has been very beneficial in the ministry.
God bless you, Behold, and your whole family.


I think that there are those who feel personally attacked if you state personal opposition to the NIV.
Its the same with People who are KJVO, who feel personally attacked, when they are classified as a "cult" by people who use other bibles, or dont use a bible at all and just use a greek text they can't actually read. (face palm)

As for me, im none of that....

Im not a "version" disciple, im just a person who, like you, has many years in the ministry, ive taught all over the world, and i recognize that God would not want the church to be filled with conflicting bibles, and that is what happens, when you have so many.
Confusion is not the work of God, and once you start....>"well my version says"....>"but my version says".....>"but wait....the greek says"........
That is the work of confusion, and that is the devil's work., as when you end up with...."which one is right....nobody knows"... then the Devil has completed his job.

This is the same thing he did to EVE..>He had her confused and questioning, the WORD.

Have you seen the "Queen James Bible'?

That one is a wonder.
The "scholars" and their committee of advisors, have created a bible that "proves" that Homosexuality is not a sin, and gays are "born this way".

So, there is one more "new version" on the pile, and i do mean the pile.


What will the "scholars" create next ? The "Transgender Edition NIV"? "The Gay Adoption NKJV".

It shouldn't be too long before we find out, as there is a lot of money to be made by a revision v2, and the next "new' bible.
 
Last edited:
I just read the Bible that I can understand, if people want to read some other version of the Bible they can too.
I don't think it should be an issue, like people can eat different foods according to what they can handle, at least they are eating.

Some things have little scripture content though and are misleading, like junk food is not really food, so I think its ok to be concerned if thats all they are eating, and suggest they try some real nourishment, but nobody can be FORCED to eat right.
 
I think that there are those who feel personally attacked if you state personal opposition to the NIV.
Its the same with People who are KJVO, who feel personally attacked, when they are classified as a "cult" by people who use other bibles, or dont use a bible at all and just use a greek text they can't actually read.
(face palm) As for me, im none of that....Im not a "version" disciple, im just a person who, like you, has many years in the ministry, ive taught all over the world, and i recognize that God would not want the church to be filled with conflicting bibles, and that is what happens, when you have so many. Confusion is not the work of God, and once you start....>"well my version says"....>"but my version says".....>"but wait....the greek says"........
That is the work of confusion, and that is the devil's work., as when you end up with...."which one is right....nobody knows"... then the Devil has completed his job.
This is the same thing he did to EVE..>He had her confused and questioning, the WORD. Have you seen the "Queen James Bible'? That one is a wonder. The "scholars" and their committee of advisors, have created a bible that "proves" that Homosexuality is not a sin, and gays are "born this way". So, there is one more "new version" on the pile, and i do mean the pile. What will the "scholars" create next ? The "Transgender Edition NIV"? "The Gay Adoption NKJV". It shouldn't be too long before we find out, as there is a lot of money to be made by a revision v2, and the next "new' bible.
Hello Behold;

I hear you and agree there are those who feel attacked, or defensive. Humans, even believers, will tend to protect or push back what we hold to dearly, including the Good Book or our faith in Christ.

This is why opinions, views are important to help us dialogue, on both sides. Opinions and "I feel statements" help us to see outside the box (discussing Jesus) of our own interpretation of Scripture, the text books we read and so on. It's about learning for Christ.

We cannot allow our opinions to turn into "let the world beware" or dismissive statements in general. You and I know that we/others/I need to listen, learn the facts to what they hold precious and allow it to sink in. If an opinion is indeed a fact that may impact the disruption of the God things we embrace, then we need to make an important decision as God leads the betterment in our lives.

This is why What bible translation do you read and why? is so important a question to ask in this discussion and I feel we need to focus on the importance it has had for the disciple. Are they growing instead of what flavor (translation) they choose to read?

I appreciate your manner in your last post,
Behold, thank you, and I look forward to more discussions with everyone, time given when I'm in between serving on the site.

My question now is, where is the
original author of his thread? By now I'd like to hear his updated response.

God bless
you, Behold, and your whole family.
 
i know many who are kjvo i use kjv i like the csb also . many that are kvo feel k.jv IS A CLOSE TO THE O.V THERE IS. it how ever is not the chosen version . years before kj had the Bible printed men were put to death by being burned alive, for translating the Bible and having it published . i use the kjv due to that is what i cut my teeth on. it does cause me study harder in research . i am not a fan of the NIV . i have found some translations a bit more blunt than kjv. the message Bible authored by a peters i think it is, is in full support of lgbt
 
I agree, forgiven61; but it is what it is.

When I log on to the forum I prefer and enjoy reading from other's own thoughts. With one exception, if its a video of your church service I would enjoy that.

God bless you, forgiven and your family.
i dont do videos most around here do the live face book
 
Just to everyone, I don't click on videos in posts as a rule, especially not knowing how long they will be, or if they have ads.
I just respond to what people write.

If I am responding to a posters particular post, I will use the little reply button, but if its just to everyone or the OP's topic, or the above posts I just use the big blue post reply button.

You know how when you talk to a bunch of people and you mean to talk to everyone but maybe only one or two people actually really listen to you. Sometimes it's like that on a forum.
 
I am always curious what bible translations christians read being there are so many to choose. I guess why did you choose the one that you like to read? Do you think there is a best one over another read?
I attached a video I made partly from an observation I made by the style of communication my uses when she is talking to others at times. My wife speaks 7 languages and from that it gave me some additional insight about bible translations i thought I would share that you might find interesting also..

Hi Shepherd Boy

At first I did not have a preference, (I read what was understandable to me) until someone told me that many bible translations have missing bible verses. The person also told me that the KJV bible is the only complete bible and the other bibles have missing words, and verses.

I was shocked and decided to investigate different bibles and found that there are missing bible verses in other bibles.

Let us look at Mark 11:26

  • Verse 26 is missing in the Good News Bible
GN.PNG
  • It is also missing in the NIV
NIV.PNG
  • It is also missing in the ESV
ESV.PNG
  • However, it exists in the KJV
KJV.PNG
I do not know the total number of bible verses that are missing in other bibles. I know for example that the following bible verses are missing in the NIV:
  • Luke 17:36
  • Mark 9:44
  • Mark 11:26
  • Matthew 23:14
  • Mark 15:28
So since then I have been using the KJV. I have only investigated the NIV, Good News and ESV. I do not know if there are other bibles which are complete like the KJV. It will be great if there is someone in the forum that knows.
 
I like the KJV if you read it too that's great, if you don't, well I think you are missing out on a lot of scripture, so I would really encourage you to find a copy if you can and at least try to read it.

It's really not as hard as people make it out to be if you can read English. It's not like the words are totally foreign.
 
Last edited:
A lady came into the bookshop and bought a Children's Bible in Samoan today.
For her little boy in Sunday School. I had asked my boss to stock them.

It's called O Le Tusi Paia

She also bought a pencil and wanted to find a cover or bag for this Bible but we didn't have any that fit.

Pray that mum and son will be blessed as they read the Bible in their native tongue.
 
Hi Shepherd Boy

At first I did not have a preference, (I read what was understandable to me) until someone told me that many bible translations have missing bible verses. The person also told me that the KJV bible is the only complete bible and the other bibles have missing words, and verses.

I was shocked and decided to investigate different bibles and found that there are missing bible verses in other bibles.

Let us look at Mark 11:26

  • Verse 26 is missing in the Good News Bible
View attachment 5970
  • It is also missing in the NIV
View attachment 5971
  • It is also missing in the ESV
View attachment 5972
  • However, it exists in the KJV
View attachment 5973
I do not know the total number of bible verses that are missing in other bibles. I know for example that the following bible verses are missing in the NIV:
  • Luke 17:36
  • Mark 9:44
  • Mark 11:26
  • Matthew 23:14
  • Mark 15:28
So since then I have been using the KJV. I have only investigated the NIV, Good News and ESV. I do not know if there are other bibles which are complete like the KJV. It will be great if there is someone in the forum that knows.

The problem is that people compare other Bibles to the KJV as if the KJV were what the men who wrote each and every book and letter in it themselves and itself was around since Moses. It wasn't.

Newer source material has been found showing that some of what was put into the KJV wasn't in the original writings. So newer Bibles omitted them or put them into footnotes as they should. It wasn't done for some nefarious purpose. It also doesn't mean that the KJV is complete because others don't have what the KJV does.

The KJV is a fine Bible, but it is a translation just like the NIV, ESV, NRSV, and NKJV.

If you notice, those who read other translations than the KJV generally have no issues with those who only read the KJV, but many who only read the KJV have an issue with those who read other translations. Who do you suppose is behind that strife?
 
Back
Top