PeaceLikeaRiver
Inactive
Speaking frankly, removing rule 3.2b would be tantamount to insisting all users here not be allowed to be Catholic. I know a few people would vote for this but I would not feel welcome here if that were the case.
My dear friend, I hear you. May I say then to you, that confession then, is first and primarily to God. All sin, ultimately, is against God and we need to acknowledge to Him first and foremost that we have sinned, turn away from our sin, and seek His grace.
....
What do you think???
Simply to show that we are called on to confess to each other when it was suggested that we should not.
I didn't see anywhere on this thread anyone suggesting we not confess to each other. It has been pointed out we don't have to confess to a priest for forgiveness of our sins. You are misrepresenting the facts Peace.Simply to show that we are called on to confess to each other when it was suggested that we should not.
You said that the priest is just a man with no power to forgive sins. But that is misrepresenting Catholic belief.I didn't see anywhere on this thread anyone suggesting we not confess to each other. It has been pointed out we don't have to confess to a priest for forgiveness of our sins. You are misrepresenting the facts Peace.
Yes, I didn't mean the sacrament, I was responding to those who said confessions should only ever go to God.Ah ok, although i think that will be “lay confession” then….and not the sacrament...
You once again are misrepresenting what was said. We should confess to others for accountability but the point some are making is priests can't forgive sins only God can.Yes, I didn't mean the sacrament, I was responding to those who said confessions should only ever go to God.
That is exactly the point I am disputing. The priest is not pretending to be God and is not filling in for God, but being a witness. Don't you, as a fundamentalist Christian, call yourself "saved" when no one but God can save you? It seems to me that you are the one speaking for God.You once again are misrepresenting what was said. We should confess to others for accountability but the point some are making is priests can't forgive sins only God can.
Well for one I'm not a fundamentalist. Why does that term keep on popping up when someone disagrees with the Word of God? Interesting! I do think you have an agenda and it isn't working on this forum.That is exactly the point I am disputing. The priest is not pretending to be God and is not filling in for God, but being a witness. Don't you, as a fundamentalist Christian, call yourself "saved" when no one but God can save you? It seems to me that you are the one speaking for God.
All right, you aren't a fundamentalist, my mistake, but the point remains. We don't put words in God's mouth. And I don't disagree with the word of God, I disagree with you when I feel you are not representing God's word. This is my last word on the subject because we are just annoying the admins now.Well for one I'm not a fundamentalist. Why does that term keep on popping up when someone disagrees with the Word of God? Interesting! I do think you have an agenda and it isn't working on this forum.
I've been avoiding this thread, I confess...
I'm not Catholic, so I understand what those who aren't are saying. I need no middle man for forgiveness of my sins, etc. But I don't think the Catholics are wrong about their ritual/sacrament either. As Christians, we all continue to sin and I see nothing unbiblical in rites that remind us of this and have us ask for forgiveness on a regular basis. God already knows our sins before we commit them. The importance to confession is that we acknowledge and recognize the sin and try to sin no more. Because it is this that separates us from God. And I really like communion at every gathering - not 1st Sunday of the month. It's a rite that Catholics can abuse just as it is often neglected by Protestants who don't ask for forgiveness enough. (Speaking on confession not communion). Can priests not absolve a confession?
From my observations, if you refer to Martin Luther's reformation, I would probably mostly disagree. If you are referring to Hulrych Zwingli's reformation then that would be a different matter me thinks.I think this controversial topic indeed: as I understand it what started the Reformation?
What am trying to say is:
The Catholic Church for some reason or another: seems to instituted a FORM: that is: to a priest only…
While the Reformation tries to suggest or to correct: we can go directly to the throne of Grace….
I think that is all legalism on FORM…
IMO: The spirit or the essence of repentance, of truthfulness of humility of confession is the heart of the one doing the confession...
From my observations, if you refer to Martin Luther's reformation, I would probably mostly disagree. If you are referring to Hulrych Zwingli's reformation then that would be a different matter me thinks.
I can't speak for all protestant denominations, but it seems Luther was only interested in transubstantiation, Papal authority and speaking in tongues aka Latin. At least that is what the Anglicans decided to run with.
Laity can not read (in a service) the words of absolution. They can not administer Holy communion, though they can assist the minister in serving at the Lord's table..
As a non-Catholic, I only know about confession what I've learned in movies -- mostly old movies. So I guess there is a dark wood area one enters -- perhaps oak with very dark stain, quite ornate. (I saw a WHOLE one of these in an antique store and wanted to buy it so badly, but I had neither the money nor the room for it.) Has that changed? Like has it modernized? How?I want to confess my sins to a priest but I'm really nervous about it and I've been postponing it. I can't really say why. I want to make a good confession and this requires some preparation, I guess....