i do feel he proclaimed victory see we fail to figure out the descended in chapter 4That is exactly my point! Since He had spoken through Noah, there is no need to say any thing else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i do feel he proclaimed victory see we fail to figure out the descended in chapter 4That is exactly my point! Since He had spoken through Noah, there is no need to say any thing else.
Dave.....of the several options available, I would leave the one on demons for the last to accept.So I just read an interesting piece on this scripture (1 Peter 3:18-20). It suggests that the spirits in prison are not people but rather demons. The demons tried to corrupt mankind before the flood ( God saved 8 people) they thought they had won when they crucified Christ Jesus but he "proclaimed to them (spirits) that he is alive and that the victory is His."
But aren't the demons the angels who rebelled against GOD and worked with satan to corrupt mankind? Where does the bible ever say that humans spirits are in prison when they died?Dave.....of the several options available, I would leave the one on demons for the last to accept.
Yes, it’s true that Jesus’s resurrection declared victory over his spiritual, demonic enemies in verse 22, it’s doubtful to me that Peter had that victory in mind in verse 19.
It seems to me that Peter appears to understand the “spirits” of verse 19 to be human beings when he says they were disobedient “in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared” in verse 20 which would rule demons out.
far as i know it dont say that.. we are dealing with scripture that is not real clear on. its either heaven or hell personally i find no in-between... we either die IN Christ Jesus or we die with out him--lost only 2 types people saved or lost. you ask some very good questions that should challenge us to find the answersBut aren't the demons the angels who rebelled against GOD and worked with satan to corrupt mankind? Where does the bible ever say that humans spirits are in prison when they died?
F61, it is the widely used Apostles’ Creed reads, which read.....“was crucified, dead, and buried, he descended into hell; the third day he rose again from the dead.”i do feel he proclaimed victory see we fail to figure out the descended in chapter 4
I for one do not believe those spirits in 1 Peter 3 are demons.But aren't the demons the angels who rebelled against GOD and worked with satan to corrupt mankind? Where does the bible ever say that humans spirits are in prison when they died?
I agree. TODAY it is heaven or hell at death, but it does not appear to be the case before the Resurrection.far as i know it dont say that.. we are dealing with scripture that is not real clear on. its either heaven or hell personally i find no in-between... we either die IN Christ Jesus or we die with out him--lost only 2 types people saved or lost. you ask some very good questions that should challenge us to find the answers
hey honestly i dont know and the ones i trust online in searching reading they cant pin point it. i dont think/believe he went to hell the bottomless pit. i have heard some say he took the keys to death and the grave .. unless the word straight up and says ..i dont feel i can say thus saith the Lord .. if not careful we can insert our opinion and make it a doctrine. i try to do my best not to insert me in a message . as the Calvinist say solo scripture. i am willing to read your comments but what i really like is comments based by scripture .F61, it is the widely used Apostles’ Creed reads, which read.....“was crucified, dead, and buried, he descended into hell; the third day he rose again from the dead.”
But the phrase “he descended into hell” does not occur in the Bible.
What does appear in Ephesians 4:8-9 is...........
"Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. 9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
Here Paul writes, “In saying, ‘He ascended,’ what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower parts of the earth?”
Does this mean that Christ “descended” to hell? Maybe but it is not explicitly stated.
It is at first unclear what is meant by “the lower parts of the earth,” other translations appear to say that "Descended" refers to Christ coming to earth in the incarnation.
Is Paul saying that the Christ who went up to heaven (in his ascension) is the same one who earlier came down from heaven (v. 10). That “descent” from heaven occurred, of course, when Christ came to be born as a man. So then, does that verse speaks of the incarnation, not of a descent into hell.
Only a question and not an argument.
mcgee writes some of the same stuff you have ..amazing he comments on ascended as delivering the o.t saints . but i find nothing on descended . saturday i will try to explore more . tonight i just got back we had a good friday service good church service.. i am also tired from last night not getting in bed till 12:30 took wifes sis to E.R she keeps kidney stones and uti . im not made for late nights . but i will explore your question . i would like to know more my selfIs Paul saying that the Christ who went up to heaven (in his ascension) is the same one who earlier came down from heaven (v. 10). That “descent” from heaven occurred, of course, when Christ came to be born as a man. So then, does that verse speaks of the incarnation, not of a descent into hell.
Only a question and not an argument.
from what i have read that is pretty closeI agree. TODAY it is heaven or hell at death, but it does not appear to be the case before the Resurrection.
It is my understanding that Old Testament saints were in a blessed state,
in Paradise awaiting Christ’s blood to be shed in order to remove the barrier and allow direct access to God’s presence that we now have today.
I agree. I am not here to argue anything but to learn and pass on what I have learned.hey honestly i dont know and the ones i trust online in searching reading they cant pin point it. i dont think/believe he went to hell the bottomless pit. i have heard some say he took the keys to death and the grave .. unless the word straight up and says ..i dont feel i can say thus saith the Lord .. if not careful we can insert our opinion and make it a doctrine. i try to do my best not to insert me in a message . as the Calvinist say solo scripture. i am willing to read your comments but what i really like is comments based by scripture .
this post i started is not to be a arguing post. there is a lot of phrases used today that are not Bible . i am not in this to be right and others wrong
mcgee writes some of the same stuff you have ..amazing he comments on ascended as delivering the o.t saints . but i find nothing on descended . saturday i will try to explore more . tonight i just got back we had a good friday service good church service.. i am also tired from last night not getting in bed till 12:30 took wifes sis to E.R she keeps kidney stones and uti . im not made for late nights . but i will explore your question . i would like to know more my self
I think you make a valid point. Consider the imagery of Ephesians 4:9-10i do feel he proclaimed victory see we fail to figure out the descended in chapter 4
I dont know who ever thought that up..if someone tells me something as they say truth. i need scriptureJesus did not have to suffer in hell.
I dont know who ever thought that up..if someone tells me something as they say truth. i need scriptur
I think you make a valid point. Consider the imagery of Ephesians 4:9-10
"(Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)"
We have two extremes being contrasted with one another. Christ ascended FAR above ALL the heavens, and he descended to the LOWEST parts of the Earth. This shows complete totality. It is all encompassing. Thus the underworld would have to be included for image to work. Why is it important?
Paul provides the reason at the end of the verse, so that Christ "might fill ALL things." The next question is why does that phrase mean. Paul has already provide that answer.
"[God] raised him from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the one to come. And he put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all." (Eph. 1:20-23)
Paul argument establishes Christ's complete and total supremacy over everything and everyone (i.e. above the heavens and below the Earth and everything in-between) and that would necessarily have to include the underworld.
i dont have time for junk doctrine one thing we can bank on is john 11:25-26 psalms 103 Bless the Lord o my soul and forget not His benefits. had it not been for the cross our sins could not be forgiven had it not been for the resurrection we could not have eternal lifeI would say that today, many in the heretical Word of Faith movement teach that the crucifixion was insufficient to atone for our sins and that Jesus also had to suffer three days of torment in hell.
I have always felt that he descended, as Origen points out, to express the fullness of his authority, but how would he best express that fullness? Would he gloat? I certainly doubt it. Would he appear in compassion? That more aligns with Christ's character as demonstrated in the gospels. So what would it means to appear in compassion? Only one answer comes to mind: reach out a hand with opportunity for forgiveness to any who choose to accept.so what do you suppose went on in the tomb the 3days and nights ?
I agree 100% but are you suggesting that if He did indeed descend to hell, then those in hell would have the opportunity to be forgiven by accepting Him?I have always felt that he descended, as Origen points out, to express the fullness of his authority, but how would he best express that fullness? Would he gloat? I certainly doubt it. Would he appear in compassion? That more aligns with Christ's character as demonstrated in the gospels. So what would it means to appear in compassion? Only one answer comes to mind: reach out a hand with opportunity for forgiveness to any who choose to accept.
Typically those who believe that Christ descended into the underworld believe he did so in order to herald his total victory over death and the powers of evil (i.e. Christ's enemies). In other words, Christ walks into the enemy camp and announces "it's over, you lost."I have always felt that he descended, as Origen points out, to express the fullness of his authority, but how would he best express that fullness? Would he gloat? I certainly doubt it. Would he appear in compassion? That more aligns with Christ's character as demonstrated in the gospels. So what would it means to appear in compassion? Only one answer comes to mind: reach out a hand with opportunity for forgiveness to any who choose to accept.
Amen!Typically those who believe that Christ descended into the underworld believe he did so in order to herald his total victory over death and the powers of evil (i.e. Christ's enemies). In other words, Christ walks into the enemy camp and announces "it's over, you lost."
Those who believe it provided a second chance are delusional. There is simply no creditable evidence for that option.
exactly that would fall under purgatory teaching which is falseThose who believe it provided a second chance are delusional. There is simply no creditable evidence for that option.