Major, that was totally tongue-in-cheek about that hundred thingy. I went that direction because of the institutional types who've told me that home fellowships aren't legitimately "church" since we are so few in number and don't have a hired, degreed pastor, board of deacons, elected elders, house keeping crew, chandeliers, parking lots, manicured lawns (although some homes do), stained glass windows, steeples...(yawn) on and on the list could go. They think we sit around and socialize rather than to have a stringent, looking at the backs of other's heads, orchestrated, religious service with the majority being nothing more than an audience they hope are absorbing something of value, but don't ever stop to check...
Sorry. I sometimes throw in the elephants in the room that most ignore for the sake of feeling good about what they think is biblical, when in fact it isn't. I'm not saying it's anti-biblical apart from the one main aspect I've been discussing, which is the lack of effective discipleship.
So, don't worry (snicker, snicker), I won't pull a Greek word out of the hat on this topic since it was totally an ironic absurdity...hmm, that's a double whammy...
So, in response to your question, putting together the two expressions "institutional model" and "church" with a little "c", that's a hard one for me. I'd have to understand your definition of the term "church" since it has so many connotations, depending on context and the person using it. I'm not trying to be nit-picky, but given that words have meaning...contrary to modern culture's practices...I differentiate (C)hurch from (c)hurch.
A (c)hurch can be filled with pagans, which many are, and I think you hit upon an excellent point. Liberal theology breeds a population who THINK they know the real Christ, when in fact they don't. Now, someone out there is bound to take exception to that, so please let me eSplain; see what visiting California did to me...
A singular individual who would have all the personality and character traits that all those in different people groups believe about him, that would make such a person a schismatic, split personality, fractured freak. That is a lord I could not follow, and who doesn't exist, and is therefore incapable of saving anyone.
So, one either believes in the Jesus described in the Bible, who overturned tables contrary to the thinking of His own disciples, or they follow a Jesus of their own creation, who can't save a flea.
Excellent point you made about thinking they know the real Jesus, and yet don't, and therefore being some of the most difficult to convince of such.
As to tradition, that is one force that has more power that nothing else has in our human makeup possesses. Traditions that become inflexible paradigm in spite of obvious failures, that is the realm of tragedy and carnage. Have I hit upon the thrust of your point?
MM
Thanks brother. No worries.
I agree with the pagans in the church. I am amazed at those people who attend church and refuse to accept the Bible and instead accept their political positions as truth.
Every January we do a sermon on abortion as the SBC has asked all of its church's to focus on it in that month. The last presidential election I made the contrast to ALL elected officials who we vote into office by reading Proverbs 24:11-12..................
" If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain;
If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?"
What does that mean I asked??? I asked everyone......
Do you read that and allow your mind and pollical position to convince YOU that it does not apply top you today?????
Or do you read and allow the Holy Spirit to speak to your heart and convict you that when you vote for a person who tells you that they are in favor of killing un-born children that "you" are guilty of the same thing that they are.......Murder.
Of course I had a letter come that told me this particular couple would not longer be able to attend our church. My letter back to them was.....
"God bless you and thank you for your attendance here and I hope that you will be able to find a church that is liberal in its theology and does not preach the Word of God".
What that says is that when anyone allows a political teaching to be more important that the Word of God.....they are "Pagan".