Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok...gotcha...."too late" is it!
I'm find many Christian folks hoping that non-Christian folks would be "converted" when the miraculousness of His Return is filling their eyes...Can't find that anywhere in the Word.
Geez, are you reading my mind? I was just thinking that God would want us to have one last chance. (and that perhaps my post was too cavalier)
No, altho I do have sight verification, it was never needed. I never doubted. I was simply reflecting that Christ in the clouds would be "seeing is believing" albeit too late.
Then if this is so (faith before regeneration), and I believe it is, than at the 2nd Advent, only the faith-filled can be fully regenerated . In other words.......no conversions because they see Him in the clouds. Why? Faith does not come by sight.
I suppose this means you agree with me? That no one, then living or resurrected, are converted at the 2nd Advent?
Silk..........death ends all chances.
??? Doesn't conversion imply someone who knows not the true Gospel? Lot's of folks know the Gospel story, but not the Gospel reality involving them.
I'm confused about your theology: You expect a revival in the "Tribulation"? Folks will convert due to fear, oppression and lack of food and water??
Every Christian has a theology. It's one's study or learning from God.
Literalism is a topic which you keep bringing up; I have mentioned it a few times as a rigid way of reading the Bible. Non-literalists (like myself)believe wholly in the Bible in it's historical, cultural and spiritual reality. It must not, in our opinion be read like a newspaper or an almanac. The Spirit must teach us to what the meaning of God is, not relying on human constructs, ways of reading or denominational programs.
Take for example: What does this mean to a literalist?:
Take for example: What does this mean to a literalist?:
Deu 15:17 Then thou shalt take an aul, and thrust it through his ear unto the door, and he shall be thy servant for ever. And also unto thy maidservant thou shalt do likewise.
Good answer Jerry, thanks. Based on your answer, a non-Hebrew speaker must be very careful hiow he understands Hebrew ideas.
No, Major: there are is no one breed of literalist. Each flavour of literalist seems to pick and choose what they want to see as literal, allegorical and poetic. You should know that!
I've associated long enough to know that.
It is just like when we were talking with our Preterist member....there are all sorts of variation in that group as well. You know that, right?
No....IMO the "for ever" slave was neither literal (in a dispensationist's manner), poetic or allegorical, Major....It was, as Jerry says, a matter of understanding Hebrew thinking about a final limiting point in time, "terminus ad quem".
The limit is until the slave's death....not for ever in the common Christian thinking.
Well it is a prickly, vociferous, unruly, take no prisoners, and knowledgeable choir (and that's just mewaving from the third row.) But there are no falsettos here.
I am more of a bass myself.
Really? That's cool...What brought that up?
Ah...so you do think "for ever" in this case is not to be taken literally, Major! Good.
Yes...and there are different schools of literalism as well.
(BTW: the slave who decides at the end of his 7 years that he preferred to stay in servitude had the ear pierced. He had the choice of remaining a servant....that is where the context is so very important!)
I prefer to address one idea at a time: I will leave off the literalisms in Revelation for another thread.