Glad to see someone is keeping track off my recordsCongrats on your 1000th post.
Glad to see someone is keeping track off my recordsCongrats on your 1000th post.
I notice random things.Glad to see someone is keeping track off my records
I thought you are the official book keeper.. And you will visit every profile every day to see if they have reached any milestone and congratulate them appropriately.. I think that's a fancy job you will likeI notice random things.
This is what I think happened the one time I spoke in tongues.. . . .Commentary - 1 Cor. 14:22–25Thus tongues are a sign … for unbelievers. Not a positive sign, to lead people to faith (as in John 2:11; 20:30–31), but as in1 Cor. 14:21 a negative sign that facilitates God’s judgment on the unbelieving. Uninterpreted tongues function as a sign of judgment. . . . Ex. 8:23; 10:12; Luke 21:11; Rom. 15:19).
The first evens signs of tongues happens in pentecost. It is quite explicit that it was human languages.. After that, at what point of time Bible explains that tongues is a spiritual language as well? I am trying to get to that. If this verse talks about both, then it is an assumption that there are 2 kinds of tongues.. Which would mean, there should be some other place where this is explicitly mentioned. Because the more I study, it seems tongues are always referring to some form of human language only (when rest of the verses in the chapter are considered)
I have always believed there are 2 kinds of tongues. I am trying to validate my understanding through Word of God. Because even if every one else on the planet believes something else, it does not make it truth! Word of God is the ultimate authority. So no number of human experiences can validate these things. That is why I am probing. So for everyone, please don't take this as a stab against anyone's belief. I am only trying to understand my own belief
Right.. But which are the verses which talks about the 2 uses of tongues? Because I used to look at certain verses in a different way.. Now I am looking them a different way! That's why I am asking..There are two uses for tongues, and the private use, which is solely for our edification, can be any language on earth or angelic. It really doesn't matter, as it is not meant for our understanding.
Paul teaches that no matter what, whether we speak an earthly language that can be understood by all or a heavenly tongue, we need to be operating with agape love.
1 Corinthians 13:1 (KJV)So then where does Paul explain language in the Spirit? I am trying to understand scripturally if there are different kind of tongues. The passage in OP clearly seems to indicate that Paul is actually talking about human languages and not heavenly language. Where does Paul talk about the unknown language of angels?
Technology won't help.Now please, with respect to Rav, anyone that says they speak in tongues, before they comment, write out the language you speak for all of us to see, in this technological age we can easily have it translated for all of us to be edified and blessed, that way we can glorify God with you.
Technology won't help.
1 Cor 14:2 For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to people but to God. Indeed, no one understands them; they utter mysteries by the Spirit.
Tongues passed away.
Now you're going to start a war on that.
Couldn't it still be a human language? For example, if I pray in Chinese, I am only praying in my spirit. Because I don't know Chinese and my mind can't grasp anything I am praying. However, if there is a Chinese person in the room, he could interpret it. Otherwise, I should keep quiet.
I thought with Abdicate and others I just agreed that the tongues referred to in verses 22 onwards is a simple human language. Why would Paul switch between 2 kind of tongues?
That's right. It would be an affront to God.
Agreed!
1 Corinthians 13:8-12English Standard Version (ESV)
8 Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. 11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. 12 For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known."
I believe that the "perfect one" is the Word of God. Grammatically, it means "mature/full". Since the only other perfect thing was Jesus, and He was not a THING but was in fact the God-man, it means to me that when the Bible is completed, the signs that the apostles had would then go away.
The reason for the sign gifts was to validate the works of the apostles as God's spokesmen on the earth.
Using technology to uncover possible deception is an affront to God.
Are you serious or just having a go at us?
First we need to read what Paul said and not jump to conclusions for our own purpose.
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 1 Cor 13:1
Paul is not teaching on tongues, he is teaching about love, and it is a simile, a comparison not necessarily fact, how do we know that, can we confirm it from the Word, yes,
I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth such an one caught up to the third heaven. And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter. 2Co 12:2-4
Paul is telling us he heard words being spoken, was it angels speaking, or was it redeemed men, I have to question how redeemed men could speak it they are present with Christ, but haven't yet received their glorified bodies, it could of been Enoch and Elijah, they both went to Heaven in there physical bodies, but I seriously doubt they would be talking in the presence of God, Cherubim and Angels, and besides if it were them Paul would probably said he saw them there, so that just leaves God, Cherubim and angels that he heard and he said it would be unlawful for man to speak the words he had heard, ...so if Paul says, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, it would be unlawful to speak in the language of angels, then it's only logical that 1 Cor 13:1 is a simile and the Holy Spirit is not inspiring Paul to teach that it would be lawful for men to speak their language, ...the Holy Spirit does not contradict Himself, if it seems like a contradiction then we are the ones who have misinterpreted it.
Rav, Thomas probably spoke in tongues, but we have also experienced the Holy Spirit translating for us a foreign language we were hearing, we have heard Tahitian being spoken, but in our ears it was English, we have heard both Spanish and Germain being spoken by visiting brothers while we were breaking bread with them and when it reached our ears it was English, French and Tahitian simultaneously, ...personally, I think there is so much more than we can imagine if we take Paul's advice and seek after love, the greatest gift of all, ...I believe those that seek out, earnestly desire to speak in tongues are actually limiting themselves with what God wants to do in their lives.
One more thing,
For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 1Co 14:14
When Thomas was giving the Gospel to the Indians, when he ask them if they wanted to receive Jesus, do you think he prayed in the Greek, Aramaic, Hebrew, or the Indian tongue for them?
And I sing in the spirit all the time the songs I know in English that the church is singing in Tahitian or French, when I sing with them in Tahitian my spirit is fruitful, but I don't understand what I'm singing, but the church is worshiping the Lord, ...it's not difficult to understand and we don't have to be super spiritual, ...remember, Jesus said we are to be converted and become like little children.
Blessings,
Gene
The "perfect" is Jesus, and His Kingdom, where we will no loner require the spiritual gifts to edify and build the Church, because the Church will already be perfected or complete. Until that time comes, we all need the use of the many gifts of God to enable us to do the work of the Kingdom---until He comes.
It's a serious matter to try to circumvent the Spirit in such a way. He provides the interpretation and translation. We don't have to manipulate the spoken language by trying to write it and decipher it.
Holy Spirit has always been able to help us discern deception perfectly. Why do you think man can do it better? Are you serious?
It's a serious matter to try to circumvent the Spirit in such a way. He provides the interpretation and translation. We don't have to manipulate the spoken language by trying to write it and decipher it.
Holy Spirit has always been able to help us discern deception perfectly. Why do you think man can do it better? Are you serious?