Who is a Judaizer? Does the NAME of Jesus in the waters of baptism offend you? Did Jesus not say, "...make disciples of all nations, baptizing them..."? Again, "He that believes AND is baptized shall be saved."???? Is baptism not a part of the Gospel Well, maybe not to many in this forum, or elsewhere.
Yes! I do have an agenda ( I cannot speak for anyone else). It is to preach the full gospel message "...by which you are saved, if you keep in memory what I have preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain." I preach repentance, baptism in water, and the NAME "...that is above every name that is named." These correspond to the death, burial, and resurrection of our Lord and Savior. Take away anyone of those elements, and there is no gospel!
YOU are!
Do not be silly by asking such silly questions as "am I ashamed of the name of Jesus."
Anyone, anyone including you who say that something must be added to the gospel in order to be saved is a Judaizer.
NO! Baptism is not a part of the gospel.
You are just angry because no one has ever said that to you before.
Any time you add anything to grace you no longer have grace. Romans 11:5-6 5.......
"Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace. 6 And if by grace, then
it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace. But if
it is of works, it is no longer grace; otherwise work is no longer work."
Baptism is a command of the Lord Jesus Christ which identifies us with Him. A person gets baptized because he is already saved, not in order to be saved. Christians are baptized in loving obedience to the Lord and because they want to identify with His death, burial and resurrection in the prescribed manner in which God taught us.
Actually this is such a silly argument I can hardly believe I got into it again. You see, “Believer’s Baptism” practiced today, even by groups who believe baptism is necessary for salvation, was not introduced until after the death of Jesus on the cross. I know you will agree to that, simply because e it is a Bible fact and a historical fact.
So then, Before that, you had John the Baptist baptizing unto repentance which was very different than believer’s baptism introduced after the cross of Jesus. Therefore, if believer’s baptism practiced after the cross of Jesus was necessary for salvation, as you are claiming, then it would have been necessary for saints before the cross to be baptized by the same baptism.
If not, then you would need to have two different gospels of salvation. One for those before the cross who did not have “Believers baptism”, and a different one for those after the cross who did. By accepting the false teaching that baptism is necessary in order to be saved, you are then forced to accept that there are at least two different gospels whereby souls are saved.
So then, how many gospel are there where by a soul can be saved?
We are making something out of nothing here and I hope we do not get too much our of control. I did not mean to upset you by the name I used, I just thought you knew what a Judiazer was. Since you did not know, apparently, I am sorry it offended you. My suggection would be to get rid of the opinion that we must be baptized to saved and no one will call you a Judiazer again.