Hey Major...I don't recall attacking any translation..I've only advocated for the use of one particular bible and I've tried to show by logic and reason why I choose that bible..I've been arguing against the process of how we go about searching for truth.Something to consider.
When the King James Bible was printed in 1611 there were many other English translations, just as there are today.
In the original KJV introduction, the Translators said they did not believe in condemning other translations. Referring to the other English versions they wrote.........
“Do we condemn the ancient? We are so far from condemning any of their labors that translated before us either in this land or beyond the sea. We acknowledge them to have been raised up of God for the building and furnishing of His church.”
Did the KJV translators think the other English Bibles were inspired? Yes. The King James translators wrote, “Nay, we affirm and avow that the meanest (worst) translation of the Bible in English is the Word of God.” So they believed that every translation was the inspired word of God, no matter how inferior others thought the translation might be. This is a very serious point. Even if we attack the poorest translation of the Word of God, we are guilty of attacking God’s Word.
The general feeling I get in here is that it doesn't really matter what your process is,each man to his own..If it works for you then yay..