We can forgive many for being cessationists. Christianity 101 is hating any 'holier than though' stigmas.
When I was first saved I spoke in tongues all night long. So I will never mock it. But we have to face a reality. Many interpreters do not understand anything anyone says. The interpretations always sound the same / doubtfully accurate. I have heard twenty lines interpreted into four lines. Most times its the annoying newcomers trying to be holier then others that make the interpretation. It is simply always an uncomfortable / weird / odd event.
Perhaps it is sad, but then it could just as easily not be God's will? When we judge ourselves to be in-Christ do we gauge 1. what gifts we operating in or 2. how much we are hating sin and clinging to what is good? I like how Rom 12:9 says that is genuine love.
Why speak in tongues when we have English? Why does God need to communicate to us in another language when we know He knows we know He knows English? I believe that tongues these days is sadly / mostly to be a personal affair. Not because we are denying the power of God or ashamed to exercise this in public, just church is not what it used to be. I can't help but see ''singing in tongues'' as a mockery of tongues.
I agree with you King. In fact if we read the Scriptures tongues were HEARD and not spoken.
I want to be very careful here and I do not want to offend anyone at all. We have talked around this now for a long time so I thought we could face it straight on. This is only an OPINION and as I have said before, NO ONE has to accept my opinion,
however that doe snot mean we have to be mean spirited and obnocuouse toward each other. That is not my goal in life.
Having said that I think we all can see that there is a great divide on this issue. On one hand you have those who see the extremes and disbelieve all of it because of the abuses that are done by some people. On the other hand you have those who make the spiritual gifts a measurement of proof that one is spiritual which leads to the idea that :
"I am more spiritual than you are because I can.............".
The fact is, some of the most unspiritual acting people and teachings comes from those claiming to be believers who claim that they are under the influence of the Holy Spirit.
If someone insists that tongues must be the sign proving the Spirit is received, then they need to include “tongues of fire” as a continuing event as well. WHY???? Because since the first time tongues was given to multiple saints at the same time the fire (shekinah glory ) was seen over their heads.
When we see the tongues first being used, it was at Pentecost in Acts 2:4. The miracle of tongues was that those who spoke them did not know the language but those who
heard understood them in their own language vs.8,11. There was no interpreter. So tongues were a
known languages but unknown to those who spoke it.
Now that is NOT what we see today in churches everywhere where tongues are spoken. The tongues spoken today can not be understood even if there was someone there to interpret what was uttered.
If it is a tongue it has to be known since the word means language and languages are for communication. Our example is the fact that the tongues spoken at Pentecost were the languages of men. They understood what they were saying in their own language.
According to Acts 2:5, they are not some ecstatic utterance that no one knows. If you choose not to agree I still love you but to me God is a God of revelation and communication to man to reveal himself in the Lord Jesus Christ. Anything that takes away from that process must be questioned and examined.
1 Cor. 12:10 states this gift of languages as “kinds of tongues” and diversities of tongues” in vs.28. The word is
glossa in Greek means a
language used by a particular people that distinguished it from other ones. The word for “kind” and “diversities” in Greek is
yenos which means a race, stock, family, nationality. All this points to it being the language of man.
In 1 Cor. 14:1-5 Paul uses the Greek word glossa meaning tongue; Luke uses this word and further defines it as being a dialektos as seen in Acts 1:19; 2:6,8; 21:40; 22:2; 26:14, which is a word that in every case refers to the language of a nation or a region.
(cf. Arndt, p. 184).