It looks like John is "inactive"......
But, I would still like to point out to others that saying we must believe the Bible when it does not mention something is a bit ridiculous. It's one thing to say the Bible doesn't say "this" or "that", but another thing to say we must then "believe" something about the missing information.....
In this case he seems to be saying "we must believe something based on the Bible not directly stating otherwise.
That is the same argument homosexuals use to defend their lifestyle as acceptable and pleasing to God - even going so far as to claim Jesus and his disciples were homosexual, in some instances.
It's the same argument pro-abortionists use to defend their "right" to murder the unborn right up to the ninth month of pregnancy!!!!
To say the example given: 2) – The Bible does NOT say that God has stopped using signs and wonders. must be believed is silly, also, because it is not necessary to our salvation!
To insist we must believe something other than what the Bible has said "we must believe", is contradicting the Bible.
What is written had one purpose: 1 John 5:13
I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.
John 10:38
But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father."
That was also the reason the Apostles were able to perform miracles. But today, most "miracles" are the ones we are warned not to believe. I believe in miracles, but not as those from Jesus and the Apostles, because....
Matthew 12:39 He answered, "A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miraculous sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah."
.