I like to apply the testimony of two or three witnesses where I can Gene.Calvin, we need to have some sort of test to authenticate if what we believe is the Truth, as intended by the Author, don't you agree?
Here is my reasoning for that, since were are expounding Scripture in a public forum then we need to be certain what we are saying is the correct interpretation as intended by the Author, because He said through James that those assuming to teach will be judged more severely (not salvation, but rather our recompense and or time on earth), James 3:1, because Jesus taught that if one should offend one (cause them to stumble, lead them away from the Truth) that is new or untaught in their faith, it would be better if he were drowned in the sea. Luke 17:2 Now, I don't want either one of those acts of correction or discipline to fall on me or any one else.
Here is what I have been using for many years now and it has never failed me yet: if there is just one verse or principle in Scripture that contradicts what I believe to be the correct interpretation then my interpretation is wrong, would you agree that would be an accurate way to judge interpretation?
Gene another way of looking at it would be that ownership was never in question...it did not need disputing. see Exo 19:5 Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine;We know Jesus was a Jew and many of His parables were taken from Jewish customs, such is the case for the scroll, the scroll is the title deed to the earth that Adam forfeited to Satan, Jesus didn't dispute Satan's ownership when he tempted Him, so what we have in chapter 5 is the time for redeeming the title of the earth, the writing inside was the information of the property such as we have on the deeds we possess, the writing on the outside was the terms necessary for redemption (according to Jewish custom),
Gene I'm having difficulty following your reasoning here. With the scroll sealed up and unopened neither John nor anyone else knew the contents.....only the author. Consider Matt 24:36 "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only.John wept because no man living or dead could redeem it, however, there was a Man, Jesus the second Adam that had prevailed against all temptations (and may I suggest He suffered more than the three temptations recorded, but rather living a perfect life, He was faultless in the subjects of the first 7 dispensations) and the seven seals could possible be the 7 failures of man from each dispensation. Whatever..., John wept, if what you are proposing is true then that makes John a monster, weeping that the scroll could not be opened and unleash such horrific destruction on mankind as you have described, that doesn't correspond with the changing of the character of the Son of Thunder who was predestined throughout his lifetime to be conformed into the image of the Lord Jesus, later known as the John the Beloved at the time of his writing the Apocalypse.
and Mar 13:32 "But concerning that day or that hour, no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. two witnesses of Scripture. It is hard to understand why the lack of qualified persons to loose the seals would evoke such emotion, perhaps John saw that scroll as something other than a title deed since ownership was not an issue.
Let's review the instances of scrolls used in Prophesy and what they seemed to represent.
Jer 36:2. The Prophetic word of the Lord to Israel and Judah. Eze 2:9,10. Notice the similarity here with the Scroll in Rev Ch5. Eze 3:1,2,3. the word of the Lord to the house of Israel. Notice that it is sweet in the mouth. Zec 5:1,2. Then Rev 10:2-10 Note that it too is sweet to taste, but also bitter to digest.
Snip
Gene